Literature DB >> 28068305

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Following Either Prefrontal Cortical-only or Dual-site Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus Patients: A Double-blind Randomized Study.

Tae-Soo Noh1, Jeong Sug Kyong, Mun Young Chang, Moo-Kyun Park, Jun-Ho Lee, Seung-Ha Oh, June Sic Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Myung-Whan Suh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated treatment outcomes following single-site repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and dual-site rTMS in the auditory cortex (AC) and DLPFC (AC + FC). STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS: This prospective randomized double-blind trial initially included 19 patients with chronic tinnitus and 17 of these patients received rTMS on the left AC and left DLPFC or only the left DLPFC. The subjects were randomly allocated to either the dual-site rTMS (AC + FC) protocol (Group 1, n = 9) or the singlesite rTMS (DLPFC) protocol (Group 2, n = 8). Group 1 received daily treatments with 2,000 pulses applied to the AC and 1,000 pulses applied to the DLPFC for 4 days (total of 12,000 pulses) and Group 2 received daily treatments with 3,000 pulses applied the DLPFC for 4 days (total of 12,000 pulses). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The severity of tinnitus was assessed before rTMS treatment using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the self-rated Visual Analog Scale. These measures were used to determine the awareness, loudness, annoyance, and effects of tinnitus on daily life at 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks after treatment.
RESULTS: The improvement in THI score was significantly better in Group 1 than in Group 2, even after controlling for the between-group differences in pretreatment THI score. In terms of psychological factors, Group 1 exhibited significant improvements in scores on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for both state anxiety (STAI-X1) and trait anxiety (STAI-X2) at 12 weeks posttreatment and scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 4 weeks posttreatment. Group 2 showed an improvement in only the STAI-X2 score at 12 weeks posttreatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The rTMS protocol effectively suppressed tinnitus in the dual-site rTMS (AC+FC) group but not in the single-site rTMS (DLPFC) group. Although recent evidence has shown that non-auditory cortices in the tinnitus network play an important role in the generation of tinnitus, our findings indicate that rTMS on non-auditory cortical sites alone may not be sufficient for treatment. Thus, dual-site rTMS in the AC and DLPFC may be preferable for controlling this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28068305     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

1.  Neural activity during attentional conflict predicts reduction in tinnitus perception following rTMS.

Authors:  G A James; J D Thostenson; G Brown; G Carter; H Hayes; S P Tripathi; D J Dobry; R B Govindan; J L Dornhoffer; D K Williams; C D Kilts; M S Mennemeier
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Association of Central Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Interventions With Efficacy and Safety in Tinnitus Management: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiann-Jy Chen; Bing-Syuan Zeng; Ching-Nung Wu; Brendon Stubbs; Andre F Carvalho; Andre R Brunoni; Kuan-Pin Su; Yu-Kang Tu; Yi-Cheng Wu; Tien-Yu Chen; Pao-Yen Lin; Chih-Sung Liang; Chih-Wei Hsu; Shih-Pin Hsu; Hung-Chang Kuo; Yen-Wen Chen; Ping-Tao Tseng; Cheng-Ta Li
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 3.  Neuroimaging Mechanisms of Therapeutic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Noah S Philip; Jennifer Barredo; Emily Aiken; Linda L Carpenter
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-11-11

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Priscila Aparecida Rodrigues; Ana Luiza Zaninotto; Iuri Santana Neville; Cintya Yukie Hayashi; André R Brunoni; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Wellingson Silva Paiva
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  Neuronavigated Versus Non-navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus: A Randomized Study.

Authors:  Hanna Sahlsten; Anu Holm; Esa Rauhala; Mari Takala; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Max Karukivi; Johanna Nikkilä; Kirsi Ylitalo; Janika Paavola; Reijo Johansson; Tero Taiminen; Satu K Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Personalization of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Subjective Tinnitus.

Authors:  Stefan Schoisswohl; Berthold Langguth; Tobias Hebel; Veronika Vielsmeier; Mohamed A Abdelnaim; Martin Schecklmann
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-31

7.  Long-Term Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Tinnitus in a Guinea Pig Model.

Authors:  Farah Amat; Jack W Zimdahl; Kristin M Barry; Jennifer Rodger; Wilhelmina H A M Mulders
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-18

8.  Adjunctive Role of Bifrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Distressed Patients with Severe Tinnitus.

Authors:  Ho Yun Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.