OBJECTIVE: Previous research has supported functional communication training (FCT) as an effective intervention for reducing challenging behavior. Clinicians often program schedule-thinning procedures to increase the portability of the treatment (i.e., reinforcement is provided less frequently). For individuals with escape-maintained problem behavior, chained schedules have proven effective in increasing task completion and supplemental procedures may ameliorate reemergence of challenging behavior as access to reinforcement is decreased. The present study compared the use of a chained schedule-thinning procedure with and without alternative reinforcement (e.g., toys and activities) embedded in an intervention in which escape from the task is provided contingent on a request for a break. METHOD: Two individuals with escape-maintained challenging behavior participated. We compared two treatment conditions, escape-only and escape-to-tangibles, using a single-subject, alternating treatments design with each treatment implemented in a distinct academic context. RESULTS: With the escape-to-tangibles treatment, we reached the final schedule in both contexts with both participants (4 successes out of 4 applications). We did not reach the final schedule with either participant with the escape-only intervention (0 successes out of 2 applications). CONCLUSION: The current results provided preliminary confirmation that providing positive plus negative reinforcement would decrease destructive behavior, increase compliance, and facilitate reinforcer-schedule thinning.
OBJECTIVE: Previous research has supported functional communication training (FCT) as an effective intervention for reducing challenging behavior. Clinicians often program schedule-thinning procedures to increase the portability of the treatment (i.e., reinforcement is provided less frequently). For individuals with escape-maintained problem behavior, chained schedules have proven effective in increasing task completion and supplemental procedures may ameliorate reemergence of challenging behavior as access to reinforcement is decreased. The present study compared the use of a chained schedule-thinning procedure with and without alternative reinforcement (e.g., toys and activities) embedded in an intervention in which escape from the task is provided contingent on a request for a break. METHOD: Two individuals with escape-maintained challenging behavior participated. We compared two treatment conditions, escape-only and escape-to-tangibles, using a single-subject, alternating treatments design with each treatment implemented in a distinct academic context. RESULTS: With the escape-to-tangibles treatment, we reached the final schedule in both contexts with both participants (4 successes out of 4 applications). We did not reach the final schedule with either participant with the escape-only intervention (0 successes out of 2 applications). CONCLUSION: The current results provided preliminary confirmation that providing positive plus negative reinforcement would decrease destructive behavior, increase compliance, and facilitate reinforcer-schedule thinning.
Entities:
Keywords:
alternative reinforcement; functional communication training; reinforcer-schedule thinning