Jill R Davis1, Bingcao Wu2, David M Kern3, Ozgur Tunceli4, Kathleen M Fox5, John Horton6, Randall F Legg6, Frank Trudo7. 1. Director, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, AstraZeneca R&D, Wilmington, DE. 2. Associate Director, RWE Design & Analytics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and was Associate Director, HealthCore, Wilmington, DE, at the time of the study. 3. Director of Research, HealthCore. 4. Director, RWE Design & Analytics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and was Director of Research, HealthCore, at the time of the study. 5. Director of Health Economics Outcomes Research, AstraZeneca, and is currently with Strategic Healthcare Solutions. 6. Employees of AstraZeneca R&D at the time of the study. 7. Medical Lead - Respiratory, AstraZeneca US Medical Affairs.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence of poor patient adherence to medications for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-documented, but its impact on disease exacerbation rates and associated healthcare costs remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between adherence levels to different inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-adrenergic agonist (LABA) and COPD exacerbation rates and costs in a commercially insured population. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, patients with COPD (aged ≥40 years) who were treatment-naïve to inhaled corticosteroid/LABA and were initiating budesonide plus formoterol or fluticasone plus salmeterol between March 1, 2009, and January 31, 2014, were identified in a national representative claims database and were followed for up to 12 months. The date of the first prescription fill for either drug was defined as the index date. Patients were divided into 4 cohorts based on adherence to the index therapy, which was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC); the cohorts were classified as adherent (PDC ≥0.8), mildly nonadherent (0.5 ≤ PDC <0.8), moderately nonadherent (0.3 ≤ PDC <0.5), and highly nonadherent (PDC <0.3). Each nonadherent group was matched in a 1:1 ratio to the adherent group independently, based on prognostically important variables, using propensity score analyses. Exacerbation rates and healthcare costs were analyzed for 1 year after treatment initiation. RESULTS: During the study period, 13,657 eligible patients with COPD initiated inhaled corticosteroid/LABA; of these, only 1898 (13.9%) patients were adherent during follow-up. Group matching resulted in 1572 patients per group for comparison 1 (adherent vs mildly nonadherent), 1604 patients for comparison 2 (adherent vs moderately nonadherent), and 1755 patients for comparison 3 (adherent vs highly nonadherent). The moderately and highly nonadherent cohorts had higher exacerbation rates than the adherent patients (comparison 2: rate ratio [RR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.21; P = .03; comparison 3: RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P = .02). Adherent patients incurred significantly lower healthcare costs than all the nonadherent groups (comparison 1, $22,671 vs $25,545; P <.01; comparison 2, $22,508 vs $24,303; P <.01; comparison 3, $22,460 vs $25,148; P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients adhered to their inhaled corticosteroid/LABA treatments had lower COPD exacerbation rates and lower healthcare costs compared with the moderately and highly nonadherent patients. Better adherence to maintenance therapies may help to reduce the clinical and economic burdens of COPD.
BACKGROUND: Evidence of poor patient adherence to medications for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-documented, but its impact on disease exacerbation rates and associated healthcare costs remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between adherence levels to different inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-adrenergic agonist (LABA) and COPD exacerbation rates and costs in a commercially insured population. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, patients with COPD (aged ≥40 years) who were treatment-naïve to inhaled corticosteroid/LABA and were initiating budesonide plus formoterol or fluticasone plus salmeterol between March 1, 2009, and January 31, 2014, were identified in a national representative claims database and were followed for up to 12 months. The date of the first prescription fill for either drug was defined as the index date. Patients were divided into 4 cohorts based on adherence to the index therapy, which was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC); the cohorts were classified as adherent (PDC ≥0.8), mildly nonadherent (0.5 ≤ PDC <0.8), moderately nonadherent (0.3 ≤ PDC <0.5), and highly nonadherent (PDC <0.3). Each nonadherent group was matched in a 1:1 ratio to the adherent group independently, based on prognostically important variables, using propensity score analyses. Exacerbation rates and healthcare costs were analyzed for 1 year after treatment initiation. RESULTS: During the study period, 13,657 eligible patients with COPD initiated inhaled corticosteroid/LABA; of these, only 1898 (13.9%) patients were adherent during follow-up. Group matching resulted in 1572 patients per group for comparison 1 (adherent vs mildly nonadherent), 1604 patients for comparison 2 (adherent vs moderately nonadherent), and 1755 patients for comparison 3 (adherent vs highly nonadherent). The moderately and highly nonadherent cohorts had higher exacerbation rates than the adherent patients (comparison 2: rate ratio [RR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.21; P = .03; comparison 3: RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P = .02). Adherent patients incurred significantly lower healthcare costs than all the nonadherent groups (comparison 1, $22,671 vs $25,545; P <.01; comparison 2, $22,508 vs $24,303; P <.01; comparison 3, $22,460 vs $25,148; P <.01). CONCLUSIONS:Patients adhered to their inhaled corticosteroid/LABA treatments had lower COPD exacerbation rates and lower healthcare costs compared with the moderately and highly nonadherent patients. Better adherence to maintenance therapies may help to reduce the clinical and economic burdens of COPD.
Entities:
Keywords:
COPD; adherence; cost; disease exacerbation; economic burden; inhaled corticosteroid/LABA; nonadherence; propensity score matching; proportion of days covered
Authors: Jørgen Vestbo; Suzanne S Hurd; Alvar G Agustí; Paul W Jones; Claus Vogelmeier; Antonio Anzueto; Peter J Barnes; Leonardo M Fabbri; Fernando J Martinez; Masaharu Nishimura; Robert A Stockley; Don D Sin; Roberto Rodriguez-Roisin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Tzahit Simon-Tuval; Steven M Scharf; Nimrod Maimon; Barbara J Bernhard-Scharf; Haim Reuveni; Ariel Tarasiuk Journal: Respir Res Date: 2011-01-13
Authors: Marlies Zwerink; Marjolein Brusse-Keizer; Paul D L P M van der Valk; Gerhard A Zielhuis; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Job van der Palen; Peter A Frith; Tanja Effing Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-03-19
Authors: Jill R Davis; Bingcao Wu; David M Kern; Ozgur Tunceli; Kathleen M Fox; John Horton; Randall F Legg; Frank Trudo Journal: Am Health Drug Benefits Date: 2017-04
Authors: Cara B Pasquale; Radmila Choate; Gretchen McCreary; Richard A Mularski; William Clark; MaryEllen Houlihan; Elisha Malanga; Barbara P Yawn Journal: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis Date: 2021-10-28
Authors: Rachelle Louise Cutler; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos; Michael Frommer; Charlie Benrimoj; Victoria Garcia-Cardenas Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Michael Bogart; Richard H Stanford; François Laliberté; Guillaume Germain; Jennifer W Wu; Mei Sheng Duh Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2019-02-19
Authors: Faustine Dalon; Nicolas Roche; Manon Belhassen; Maëva Nolin; Hervé Pegliasco; Gaëtan Deslée; Bruno Housset; Philippe Devillier; Eric Van Ganse Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2019-08-20
Authors: Chad Moretz; Ashley L Cole; George Mu; Benjamin Wu; Amy Guisinger; Yunhao Liu; Beth Hahn; Lee Baylis Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2020-09-16