Literature DB >> 22503814

Why the P-value culture is bad and confidence intervals a better alternative.

J Ranstam.   

Abstract

In spite of frequent discussions of misuse and misunderstanding of probability values (P-values) they still appear in most scientific publications, and the disadvantages of erroneous and simplistic P-value interpretations grow with the number of scientific publications. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage prefer confidence intervals. This is a brief discussion of problems surrounding P-values and confidence intervals.
Copyright © 2012 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22503814     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  20 in total

1.  Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Changes in Patients With Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: Eighteen-Month Data From a Randomized Controlled Trial of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy Versus Physical Therapy.

Authors:  Jamie E Collins; Elena Losina; Robert G Marx; Ali Guermazi; Mohamed Jarraya; Morgan H Jones; Bruce A Levy; Lisa A Mandl; Scott D Martin; Rick W Wright; Kurt P Spindler; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget.

Authors:  Jiyeon K Denninger; Bryon M Smith; Elizabeth D Kirby
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Multimodal Routing: Improving Local and Global Interpretability of Multimodal Language Analysis.

Authors:  Yao-Hung Hubert Tsai; Martin Q Ma; Muqiao Yang; Ruslan Salakhutdinov; Louis-Philippe Morency
Journal:  Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process       Date:  2020-11

4.  Impact of Nonadherence to Inhaled Corticosteroid/LABA Therapy on COPD Exacerbation Rates and Healthcare Costs in a Commercially Insured US Population.

Authors:  Jill R Davis; Bingcao Wu; David M Kern; Ozgur Tunceli; Kathleen M Fox; John Horton; Randall F Legg; Frank Trudo
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2017-04

5.  Generalizing the results: how can we improve our reports?

Authors:  Mikhail Saltychev; Merja Eskola
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Lee M Ellis; Erika W Davies; Margaret McFall-Ngai; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 7.867

7.  Can testing clinical significance reduce false positive rates in randomized controlled trials? A snap review.

Authors:  Theophile Bigirumurame; Adetayo S Kasim
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-12-28

Review 8.  Preanalytical investigations of phlebotomy: methodological aspects, pitfalls and recommendations.

Authors:  Cristiano Ialongo; Sergio Bernardini
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

9.  Why, When and How to Adjust Your P Values?

Authors:  Mohieddin Jafari; Naser Ansari-Pour
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.479

10.  The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance - a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Janus Christian Jakobsen; Christian Gluud; Per Winkel; Theis Lange; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.