Literature DB >> 28626013

Sleep Disrupts High-Level Speech Parsing Despite Significant Basic Auditory Processing.

Shiri Makov1,2, Omer Sharon1, Nai Ding3, Michal Ben-Shachar2,4, Yuval Nir5,6,7, Elana Zion Golumbic8.   

Abstract

The extent to which the sleeping brain processes sensory information remains unclear. This is particularly true for continuous and complex stimuli such as speech, in which information is organized into hierarchically embedded structures. Recently, novel metrics for assessing the neural representation of continuous speech have been developed using noninvasive brain recordings that have thus far only been tested during wakefulness. Here we investigated, for the first time, the sleeping brain's capacity to process continuous speech at different hierarchical levels using a newly developed Concurrent Hierarchical Tracking (CHT) approach that allows monitoring the neural representation and processing-depth of continuous speech online. Speech sequences were compiled with syllables, words, phrases, and sentences occurring at fixed time intervals such that different linguistic levels correspond to distinct frequencies. This enabled us to distinguish their neural signatures in brain activity. We compared the neural tracking of intelligible versus unintelligible (scrambled and foreign) speech across states of wakefulness and sleep using high-density EEG in humans. We found that neural tracking of stimulus acoustics was comparable across wakefulness and sleep and similar across all conditions regardless of speech intelligibility. In contrast, neural tracking of higher-order linguistic constructs (words, phrases, and sentences) was only observed for intelligible speech during wakefulness and could not be detected at all during nonrapid eye movement or rapid eye movement sleep. These results suggest that, whereas low-level auditory processing is relatively preserved during sleep, higher-level hierarchical linguistic parsing is severely disrupted, thereby revealing the capacity and limits of language processing during sleep.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Despite the persistence of some sensory processing during sleep, it is unclear whether high-level cognitive processes such as speech parsing are also preserved. We used a novel approach for studying the depth of speech processing across wakefulness and sleep while tracking neuronal activity with EEG. We found that responses to the auditory sound stream remained intact; however, the sleeping brain did not show signs of hierarchical parsing of the continuous stream of syllables into words, phrases, and sentences. The results suggest that sleep imposes a functional barrier between basic sensory processing and high-level cognitive processing. This paradigm also holds promise for studying residual cognitive abilities in a wide array of unresponsive states.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/377772-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; entrainment; sleep; speech processing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28626013      PMCID: PMC6596654          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0168-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  15 in total

1.  Cortical encoding of acoustic and linguistic rhythms in spoken narratives.

Authors:  Cheng Luo; Nai Ding
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Sleep Differentially Affects Early and Late Neuronal Responses to Sounds in Auditory and Perirhinal Cortices.

Authors:  Yaniv Sela; Aaron Joseph Krom; Lottem Bergman; Noa Regev; Yuval Nir
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Assessing the depth of language processing in patients with disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Peng Gui; Yuwei Jiang; Di Zang; Zengxin Qi; Jiaxing Tan; Hiromi Tanigawa; Jian Jiang; Yunqing Wen; Long Xu; Jizong Zhao; Ying Mao; Mu-Ming Poo; Nai Ding; Stanislas Dehaene; Xuehai Wu; Liping Wang
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The Influence of Auditory Attention on Rhythmic Speech Tracking: Implications for Studies of Unresponsive Patients.

Authors:  Rodika Sokoliuk; Giulio Degano; Lucia Melloni; Uta Noppeney; Damian Cruse
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  General auditory and speech-specific contributions to cortical envelope tracking revealed using auditory chimeras.

Authors:  Kevin D Prinsloo; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Reduced neural feedback signaling despite robust neuron and gamma auditory responses during human sleep.

Authors:  Hanna Hayat; Amit Marmelshtein; Aaron J Krom; Yaniv Sela; Ariel Tankus; Ido Strauss; Firas Fahoum; Itzhak Fried; Yuval Nir
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 28.771

7.  Anesthesia-induced loss of consciousness disrupts auditory responses beyond primary cortex.

Authors:  Aaron J Krom; Amit Marmelshtein; Hagar Gelbard-Sagiv; Ariel Tankus; Hanna Hayat; Daniel Hayat; Idit Matot; Ido Strauss; Firas Fahoum; Martin Soehle; Jan Boström; Florian Mormann; Itzhak Fried; Yuval Nir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The power of rhythms: how steady-state evoked responses reveal early neurocognitive development.

Authors:  Claire Kabdebon; Ana Fló; Adélaïde de Heering; Richard Aslin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 7.400

9.  Characterizing Neural Entrainment to Hierarchical Linguistic Units using Electroencephalography (EEG).

Authors:  Nai Ding; Lucia Melloni; Aotian Yang; Yu Wang; Wen Zhang; David Poeppel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  The Involvement of Endogenous Neural Oscillations in the Processing of Rhythmic Input: More Than a Regular Repetition of Evoked Neural Responses.

Authors:  Benedikt Zoefel; Sanne Ten Oever; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.