Literature DB >> 36041853

General auditory and speech-specific contributions to cortical envelope tracking revealed using auditory chimeras.

Kevin D Prinsloo1, Edmund C Lalor2.   

Abstract

In recent years research on natural speech processing has benefited from recognizing that low frequency cortical activity tracks the amplitude envelope of natural speech. However, it remains unclear to what extent this tracking reflects speech-specific processing beyond the analysis of the stimulus acoustics. In the present study, we aimed to disentangle contributions to cortical envelope tracking that reflect general acoustic processing from those that are functionally related to processing speech. To do so, we recorded EEG from subjects as they listened to "auditory chimeras" - stimuli comprised of the temporal fine structure (TFS) of one speech stimulus modulated by the amplitude envelope (ENV) of another speech stimulus. By varying the number of frequency bands used in making the chimeras, we obtained some control over which speech stimulus was recognized by the listener. No matter which stimulus was recognized, envelope tracking was always strongest for the ENV stimulus, indicating a dominant contribution from acoustic processing. However, there was also a positive relationship between intelligibility and the tracking of the perceived speech, indicating a contribution from speech specific processing. These findings were supported by a follow-up analysis that assessed envelope tracking as a function of the (estimated) output of the cochlea rather than the original stimuli used in creating the chimeras. Finally, we sought to isolate the speech-specific contribution to envelope tracking using forward encoding models and found that indices of phonetic feature processing tracked reliably with intelligibility. Together these results show that cortical speech tracking is dominated by acoustic processing, but also reflects speech-specific processing.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT:Activity in auditory cortex is known to dynamically track the energy fluctuations, or amplitude envelope, of speech. Measures of this tracking are now widely used in research on hearing and language and have had a substantial influence on theories of how auditory cortex parses and processes speech. But, how much of this speech tracking is actually driven by speech-specific processing rather than general acoustic processing is unclear, limiting its interpretability and its usefulness. Here, by merging two speech stimuli together to form so-called auditory chimeras, we show that EEG tracking of the speech envelope is dominated by acoustic processing, but also reflects linguistic analysis. This has important implications for theories of cortical speech tracking and for using measures of that tracking in applied research.
Copyright © 2022 Prinsloo and Lalor.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36041853      PMCID: PMC9581567          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2735-20.2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  80 in total

1.  Neural responses to natural and model-matched stimuli reveal distinct computations in primary and nonprimary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sam V Norman-Haignere; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 2.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex.

Authors:  John H R Maunsell; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Auditory stream formation affects comodulation masking release retroactively.

Authors:  Torsten Dau; Stephan Ewert; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; George Karmos; Ashesh D Mehta; Istvan Ulbert; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Attentional Selection in a Cocktail Party Environment Can Be Decoded from Single-Trial EEG.

Authors:  James A O'Sullivan; Alan J Power; Nima Mesgarani; Siddharth Rajaram; John J Foxe; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Malcolm Slaney; Shihab A Shamma; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.

Authors:  Michael J Crosse; Giovanni M Di Liberto; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; Nai Ding; Stephan Bickel; Peter Lakatos; Catherine A Schevon; Guy M McKhann; Robert R Goodman; Ronald Emerson; Ashesh D Mehta; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-06

9.  Perceptual restoration of masked speech in human cortex.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Maxime O Baud; Matthias J Sjerps; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Eye activity tracks task-relevant structures during speech and auditory sequence perception.

Authors:  Peiqing Jin; Jiajie Zou; Tao Zhou; Nai Ding
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.