Literature DB >> 28625496

Can We Get Faculty Interviewers on the Same Page? An Examination of a Structured Interview Course for Surgeons.

Aimee K Gardner1, Brenna C D'Onofrio2, Brian J Dunkin3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Guidance on how to train faculty to conduct structured interviews and implement them into current screening processes is lacking. The goal of this study is to describe a structured interview training program designed specifically for surgeons and examine its effectiveness.
METHODS: Faculty involved in advanced surgical fellowship interviews completed a 20-item knowledge assessment and video-based applicant interview ratings before taking a half-day course on conducting structured interviews. The course consisted of evidence-based strategies and methods for conducting structured interviews, asking questions, and rating applicants in a highly interactive format. After the course, faculty again completed the knowledge assessment and provided ratings for 3 video-based applicant interviews.
RESULTS: All faculty members (N = 5) responsible for selecting fellows in minimally invasive and bariatric surgery completed the training. Faculty had an average of 15.8 ± 9.12 years in practice. Average performance on the precourse knowledge assessment was 35% ± 6.12% and the group was unable to achieve acceptable agreement for applicant interview scores for any of the competencies assessed. After the course, faculty demonstrated significant improvements (p < 0.01) on the knowledge assessment, more than doubling their scores on the pretest with average scores of 80% ± 9.35%. Faculty also improved their interrater agreement of applicant competency, with 80% of the applicant interview ratings within 2 points of each other.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a half-day course designed to teach principles and skills around structured interviewing and assessment demonstrated significant improvements in both interviewing knowledge and interrater agreement. These findings support the time and resources required to develop and implement a structured interview training program for surgeons for the postgraduate admissions process.
Copyright © 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Systems-Based Practice; interview; residency; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28625496     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  3 in total

Review 1.  Systems-Level Reforms to the US Resident Selection Process: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ryley K Zastrow; Jesse Burk-Rafel; Daniel A London
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

2.  A novel maturity index for assessing medical device startups.

Authors:  Brian Green; Sowmya Lokappa; Katy Rudnick; Frances J Richmond; Grzegorz Zapotoczny; Juan Espinoza
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-08-01

Review 3.  Best Practices for Reducing Bias in the Interview Process.

Authors:  Ilana Bergelson; Chad Tracy; Elizabeth Takacs
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.862

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.