Literature DB >> 28624023

Enhanced radiation damage caused by iodinated contrast agents during CT examination.

Ling Wang1, Qiang Li2, Xi-Ming Wang1, Guang-Yu Hao1, Su Hu1, Chun-Hong Hu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To access the effect of iodinate contrast agent (ICA) on DNA double-stand breaks (DSBs) in human peripheral blood lymphocytes during computed tomography (CT) examinations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This present study was approved by the institutional ethics committee; written informed patient consent was obtained from 70 patients. A total of 48 patients underwent computed tomography urography (CTU), in which only one time CT scanning was examined after injecting ICA, and 22 patients received unenhanced whole abdominal CT, among them 10 patients were selected to get ICA injection immediately after irradiation. Blood samples were taken from all patients prior to and immediately after CT scan, as well as 8min after the injection of ICA. The lymphocytes in these blood samples were separated by using density-gradient centrifugation, fixed and immunostained with γH2AX antibody. The average number of phosphorylated histone H2AX (γH2AX) foci per lymphocyte was counted under a fluorescence microscopy. Differences in the number of γH2AX-foci were statistically analyzed using independent sample t test and one way ANOVA. RESULT: The three patient groups had no significant differences in the baseline foci numbers(P>0.05). The γH2AX-focus levels increased in both groups after CT scan. Patients who underwent CTU examinations had a greater DSBs level (mean±standard error of mean, 0.945±0.184 foci per cell) than those who received unenhanced whole abdominal CT scan (mean±standard error of mean, 0.700±0.112 foci per cell), increasing by about 37.9%; The ICA injected before CT scan itself had an effect on the DSBs, which increased DSBs level by approximately 90.3% (0.059±0.018vs 0.031±0.025, P<0.05), but no significant difference was found if added after irradiation, increasing DSBs level only by 3.2% approximately (0.711±0.091vs 0.689±0.108, P=0.499).
CONCLUSION: The iodinated contrast agent itself can lead to an increase in the level of DSBs as assessed with γH2AX foci formation, and the application of ICA can amplify DNA damage induced by diagnostic x-ray procedures such as whole abdominal CT.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography scan; DNA double-stand breaks; Iodinate contrast agent; Phosphorylated histone H2AX foci

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28624023     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  11 in total

1.  Improved identification of DNA double strand breaks: γ-H2AX-epitope visualization by confocal microscopy and 3D reconstructed images.

Authors:  Nico Ruprecht; Martin N Hungerbühler; Ingrid B Böhm; Johannes T Heverhagen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-02-24       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Enhanced radiation dose and DNA damage associated with iodinated contrast media in diagnostic X-ray imaging.

Authors:  Richard Harbron; Elizabeth A Ainsbury; Simon D Bouffler; Rick J Tanner; Jonathan S Eakins; Mark S Pearce
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial fibrosis in patients with heart failure and its predictive value for prognosis.

Authors:  Guangyao Lin; Bei Dong; Yuzhou Li; Wenqi Huang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  Personalized administration of contrast medium with high delivery rate in low tube voltage coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Sock Keow Tan; Kwan Hoong Ng; Chai Hong Yeong; Raja Rizal Azman Raja Aman; Fadhli Mohamed Sani; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-04

5.  Potassium Iodide Nanoparticles Enhance Radiotherapy against Breast Cancer by Exploiting the Sodium-Iodide Symporter.

Authors:  Benjamin L Cline; Wen Jiang; Chaebin Lee; Zhengwei Cao; Xueyuan Yang; Shuyue Zhan; Harrison Chong; Tao Zhang; Zhaoguo Han; Xuedan Wu; Li Yao; Hui Wang; Weizhong Zhang; Zibo Li; Jin Xie
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 18.027

Review 6.  Estimation of the effects of medical diagnostic radiation exposure based on DNA damage.

Authors:  Lin Shi; Satoshi Tashiro
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  The Ameliorative Role of Acacia senegal Gum against the Oxidative Stress and Genotoxicity Induced by the Radiographic Contrast Medium (Ioxitalamate) in Albino Rats.

Authors:  Islam El-Garawani; Sobhy Hassab El-Nabi; Ahmed El Kattan; Azza Sallam; Sabha Elballat; Shaimaa Abou-Ghanima; Islam H El Azab; Hesham R El-Seedi; Shaden A M Khalifa; Sawsan El-Shamy
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-02

Review 8.  Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?

Authors:  Niels Belmans; Anne Caroline Oenning; Benjamin Salmon; Bjorn Baselet; Kevin Tabury; Stéphane Lucas; Ivo Lambrichts; Marjan Moreels; Reinhilde Jacobs; Sarah Baatout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  The presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Mahta Mazloumi; Gert Van Gompel; Veerle Kersemans; Johan de Mey; Nico Buls
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Effect of Iodine-based Contrast Material on Radiation Dose at CT.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; Pooyan Sahbaee; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.