Literature DB >> 22120410

Immediate titanium mesh cranioplasty for treatment of postcraniotomy infections.

Joshua J Wind1, Chima Ohaegbulam, Fabio M Iwamoto, Peter M Black, John K Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Postcraniotomy infections have generally been treated by debridement of infected tissues, disposal of the bone flap, and delayed cranioplasty several months later to repair the resulting skull defect. Debridement followed by retention of the bone flap has also been advocated. Here we propose an alternative operative strategy for the treatment of postcraniotomy infections.
METHODS: Two patients presenting with clinical and radiographic signs and symptoms of postcraniotomy infections were treated by debridement, bone flap disposal, and immediate titanium mesh cranioplasty. The patients were subsequently administered antibiotics, and their clinical courses were followed.
RESULTS: The patients treated in this fashion did not have recurrence of their infections during 3-year follow-up periods.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical debridement, bone flap disposal, and immediate titanium mesh cranioplasty may be a suitable option for the treatment of postcraniotomy infections. This treatment strategy facilitates the eradication of infectious sources and obviates the risks and costs associated with a second surgical procedure. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22120410      PMCID: PMC3290757          DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  24 in total

1.  A prospective study of computer-aided design and manufacture of titanium plate for cranioplasty and its clinical outcome.

Authors:  J Joffe; M Harris; F Kahugu; S Nicoll; A Linney; R Richards
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  Titanium in reconstructive surgery of the skull and face.

Authors:  G B Blake; M R MacFarlane; J W Hinton
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1990-09

3.  Biomechanical testing of alloplastic PMMA cranioplasty materials.

Authors:  Barry L Eppley
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  The use of allograft or autograft and expandable titanium cages for the treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Daniel C Lu; Vincent Wang; Dean Chou
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Preservation of bone flap after craniotomy infection.

Authors:  Pedro David Delgado-López; V Martín-Velasco; J M Castilla-Díez; A M Galacho-Harriero; A Rodríguez-Salazar
Journal:  Neurocirugia (Astur)       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.553

6.  Individual prefabricated titanium implants in reconstructive craniofacial surgery: clinical and technical aspects of the first 22 cases.

Authors:  H Eufinger; M Wehmöller
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Management of postneurosurgical bone flap loss caused by infection.

Authors:  Steffen Baumeister; Alberto Peek; Allen Friedman; L Scott Levin; Jeffrey R Marcus
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Risk factors for neurosurgical site infections after craniotomy: a prospective multicenter study of 2944 patients. The French Study Group of Neurosurgical Infections, the SEHP, and the C-CLIN Paris-Nord. Service Epidémiologie Hygiène et Prévention.

Authors:  A M Korinek
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Martin Klein; Thomas-Nikolas Lehmann
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.047

10.  Successful treatment of spondylodiscitis using titanium cages: a 3-year follow-up of 22 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Yohan Robinson; Sven Kevin Tschoeke; Thomas Finke; Ralph Kayser; Wolfgang Ertel; Christoph E Heyde
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  6 in total

1.  Exploring for the optimal structural design for the 3D-printing technology for cranial reconstruction: a biomechanical and histological study comparison of solid vs. porous structure.

Authors:  Jun Young Lim; Namhyun Kim; Jong-Chul Park; Sun K Yoo; Dong Ah Shin; Kyu-Won Shim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Comparison of two different titanium cranioplasty methods: Custom-made titanium prostheses versus precurved titanium mesh.

Authors:  Domenico Policicchio; Gina Casu; Giosuè Dipellegrini; Artan Doda; Giampiero Muggianu; Riccardo Boccaletti
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-06-13

3.  Cranioplasty Using Autologous Bone versus Porous Polyethylene versus Custom-Made Titanium Mesh : A Retrospective Review of 108 Patients.

Authors:  Jun-Ki Kim; Sang-Bok Lee; Seo-Yeon Yang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-10-30

4.  Salvage of an exposed cranial prosthetic implant using a transposition flap with an indwelling antibiotic irrigation system.

Authors:  Sung Oh Hwang; Lan Sook Chang
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2020-02-20

5.  Management of infected hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: Is salvage feasible?

Authors:  Alessandro Di Rienzo; Roberto Colasanti; Mauro Dobran; Francesco Formica; Martina Della Costanza; Erika Carrassi; Denis Aiudi; Maurizio Iacoangeli
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-06-21

6.  Delayed Brain Edema and Swelling following Craniectomy for Evacuation of an Epidural Abscess that Improved by Cranioplasty: Case Report.

Authors:  Narushi Sugii; Masahide Matsuda; Tomokazu Sekine; Hideaki Matsumura; Tetsuya Yamamoto; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  J Neurol Surg Rep       Date:  2017-08-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.