| Literature DB >> 28622767 |
Poppy H L Lamberton1,2, Christina L Faust3, Joanne P Webster4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration of praziquantel is the World Health Organization's endorsed control strategy for schistosomiasis. A decade of annual treatments across sub-Saharan Africa has resulted in significant reductions of infection prevalence and intensity levels, although 'hotspots' remain. Repeated drug treatments place strong selective pressures on parasites, which may affect life-history traits that impact transmission dynamics. Understanding drug treatment responses and the evolution of such traits can help inform on how to minimise the risk of drug resistance developing, maximise sustainable control programme success, and improve diagnostic protocols.Entities:
Keywords: Biomphalaria; Establishment; Fecundity; Mouse; Praziquantel; Resistance; Schistosoma mansoni; Survival; Trade-offs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28622767 PMCID: PMC5472905 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-017-0324-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Poverty ISSN: 2049-9957 Impact factor: 4.520
Fig. 1Experimental design for longitudinal selection of Schistosoma mansoni under in vivo praziquantel pressure (0, 25, or 50 mg/kg) for three parasite lines (susceptible (S), resistant (R), and a coinfected line (RS)). Praziquantel treatment was administered to the mice 42 days after parasite exposure. Mice were culled between days 47 and 62. Resultant miracidia were used to infect the snail at 6 miracidia/snail. In P1 mice were infected with 220 cercariae/mouse. For F1-F3, 110 cercariae/mouse were used. The experimental design shown here is an example showing only the parasite line started with the S isolate
The estimates for each of the predictor variables included in the best-fit multivariate generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) for the standardized total number of adult Schistosoma mansoni adult worms and daily miracidia per worm pair
| Variable |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| IRR (95% | IRR (95% | |
| Intercept | 14.56*** | 21.53*** |
| (11.11, 19.08) | (18.20, 25.47) | |
| Parasite line (baseline: S) | ||
| R | 1.06 (0.91, 1.23) | 0.95 (0.76, 1.18) |
| RS | 1.33*** (1.15, 1.53) | 1.21 (0.98, 1.50) |
| Praziquantel selection (baseline: control) | ||
| Low selection | 0.83* (0.71, 0.97) | – |
| High selection | 0.80** (0.68, 0.94) | – |
| Praziquantel treatment (baseline: 0 mg/kg) | ||
| 25 mg/kg | – | 0.37*** (0.29, 0.47) |
| 50 mg/kg | – | 0.26*** (0.20, 0.33) |
| Generation | 1.26*** (1.19, 1.34) | – |
| Proportion weight change | 0.17*** (0.08, 0.33) | – |
IRR incidence rate ratio, CI confidence interval, * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 2Sex ratios of Schistosoma mansoni adult worms across four generations for each parasite line and praziquantel treatment regime. Each panel of the figure represents one of the four generations labelled from 1 (P1) through to 4 (F3). Values above 1 indicate an excess of females, whilst values below 1 indicate an excess of males
Fig. 3Daily mean viable Schistosoma mansoni miracidia output per worm pair (fecundity). Each boxplot summarizes the daily miracidial output per pair across four generations for each parasite line and praziquantel treatment dose
The estimates for predictor variables from the best fit linear mixed model for virulence associated with Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice
| Predictor Variables |
|
|---|---|
| Est (SE) | |
| Intercept | 4.7** (1.43) |
| Praziquantel treatment (baseline: 0 mg/kg) | |
| 25 mg/kg | 2.11*** (0.43) |
| 50 mg/kg | 1.54** (0.46) |
| log10 (total miracidia) | 1.22** (0.42) |
SE standard error; * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001