Literature DB >> 28622362

The complete mitochondrial genome of Sesarmops sinensis reveals gene rearrangements and phylogenetic relationships in Brachyura.

Bo-Ping Tang1, Zhao-Zhe Xin1, Yu Liu1, Dai-Zhen Zhang1, Zheng-Fei Wang1, Hua-Bin Zhang1, Xin-Yue Chai1, Chun-Lin Zhou1, Qiu-Ning Liu1.   

Abstract

Mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) is very important to understand molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Herein, in this study, the complete mitogenome of Sesarmops sinensis was reported. The mitogenome was 15,905 bp in size, and contained 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, and a control region (CR). The AT skew and the GC skew are both negative in the mitogenomes of S. sinensis. The nucleotide composition of the S. sinensis mitogenome was also biased toward A + T nucleotides (75.7%). All tRNA genes displayed a typical mitochondrial tRNA cloverleaf structure, except for the trnS1 gene, which lacked a dihydroxyuridine arm. S. sinensis exhibits a novel rearrangement compared with the Pancrustacean ground pattern and other Brachyura species. Based on the 13 PCGs, the phylogenetic analysis showed that S. sinensis and Sesarma neglectum were clustered on one branch with high nodal support values, indicating that S. sinensis and S. neglectum have a sister group relationship. The group (S. sinensis + S. neglectum) was sister to (Parasesarmops tripectinis + Metopaulias depressus), suggesting that S. sinensis belongs to Grapsoidea, Sesarmidae. Phylogenetic trees based on amino acid sequences and nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial 13 PCGs using BI and ML respectively indicate that section Eubrachyura consists of four groups clearly. The resulting phylogeny supports the establishment of a separate subsection Potamoida. These four groups correspond to four subsections of Raninoida, Heterotremata, Potamoida, and Thoracotremata.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28622362      PMCID: PMC5473591          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The Brachyura mostly live in littoral regions of tropical shallow seas and about 7000 species have been described and is the most species rich infraorder within Decapoda [1]. Phylogenetic relationships within the Brachyura are complicated because of the extreme morphological and ecological diversity within the group [2]. Four groups of Brachyura (Dromiacea, Raninoida, Heterotremata and Thoracotremata) were recognized [3-5]. Raninoida, Heterotremata and Thoracotremata should be attributed to Eubrachyura, which is a sisiter group to Dromiacea [6,7]. Animal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), a double-stranded circular molecule, ranging from 14 to 19 kilobases (kb) in size, containing 37 genes, including 13 PCGs, ATPase subunits 6 and 8 of the ATPase (atp6 and atp8), cytochrome c oxidase subunits 1–3 (cox1cox3), cytochrome B (cob), NADH dehydrogenase subunits 1–6 and 4 L (nad1–6 and nad4L), 22 tRNA genes, two rRNA genes and CR [8]. The mtDNA can provide important information on rearrangement trends and phylogeny because of its rapid evolutionary rate and lack of genetic recombination [8]. Using complete mitogenomes is becoming increasingly common for phylogenetic reconstruction [9-11]. The AT-content, secondary structures of tRNAs, and gene rearrangements can be inferred from animal mitogenomes at the genome level [12]. Partial DNA sequences are often too short to contain sufficient phylogenetic information [13]. Further, the addition of rRNA makes alignment ambiguous [2]. It is becoming increasingly common to use complete animal mitogenomes for phylogenetic reconstruction [9-11]. To date, there has been no reports of the complete mitogenome of S. sinensis. Thus, in this paper, the complete mitogenome of S. sinensis was sequenced and compared with other Brachyura mitogenomes. The available complete mitogenomes were used to provide insight into the phylogenetic relationship of S. sinensis and related species. These results will help us to understand features of S. sinensis mitogenome and the evolutionary relationships within Brachyura.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

There are no specific permits for crabs collection in the selected locations. The sampling locations are not privately-owned or natural protected areas. Crabs used for the experiments are not considered endangered or protected species, and its collection is legal in China.

Sampling and DNA extraction

Adult specimens of S. sinensis were collected from Fujian province in China in June 2014. The total genomic DNA of S. sinensis was isolated from single specimens using the Aidlab Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Aidlab, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA from an individual S. sinensis crab was used to amplify the complete mitogenome.

PCR amplification and sequencing

To amplify the entire mitogenome of S. sinensis, specific primers were designed based on the conserved nucleotide sequences of known mitochondrial sequences in the Brachyura [14-18]. The complete mitogenome of S. sinensis was obtained using a combination of conventional PCR and long PCR to amplify overlapping fragments spanning the whole mitogenome. First, six conserved genes (cox1, cox3, 12S, 16S, nad4, cob) were sequencd using the universal primer of crabs. Then the specific primers were designed by conservative sequences. Finally the complete mitogenome was generated by overlapping PCR with specific primers. The fragments were amplified using Aidlab Red Taq (Aidlab) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR reactions for the fragments were performed in a 50μL volume with 5μL of 10×Taq plus Buffer (Mg2+), 4μL of dNTPs, 2μL each of the primers, 2μL of DNA, 34.5μL of ddH2O, and 0.5μL Red Taq DNA polymerase. The PCR reactions were performed using the following procedures: 94°C for 3 min; followed by 40 cycles of 30s at 94°C, annealing for 35s at 48–56°C (depending on primer combination), elongation for 1–3min (depending on length of the fragments) at 72°C; and a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis (1% w/v) and purified using the DNA gel extraction kit (Aidlab, China). The purified PCR products were ligated into the T-vector (SangonBiotech, China) and sequenced at least three times.

Sequence alignment and gene annotation

Thirty-nine complete Brachyura mitogenomes were downloaded from GenBank. In addition, the mitogenomes of Cherax destructor and Cambaroides similis were downloaded from GenBank and used as outgroup taxons. Detailed information is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

List of 40 Brachyura species analysed in this paper with their GenBank accession numbers.

SpeciesFamilySize (bp)Accession No.
Sesarmops sinensisSesarmidae15,905KR336554
Sesarma neglectumSesarmidae15,920KX156954
Metopaulias depressusSesarmidae15,765KX118277
Parasesarmops tripectinisSesarmidae15,612KU343209
Helice latimeraVarunidae16,246KU589291
Eriocheir japonica sinensisVarunidae16,378KM516908
Eriocheir japonica hepuensisVarunidae16,335FJ455506
Eriocheir japonica japonicaVarunidae16,352FJ455505
Cyclograpsus granulosusVarunidae16,300LN624373
Gandalfus yunohanaBythograeidae15,567EU647222
Gandalfus puiaBythograeidae15,548KR002727
Austinograea alayseaeBythograeidae15,620JQ035660
Austinograea rodriguezensisBythograeidae15,611JQ035658
Ocypode cordimanusOcypodidae15,604KT896743
Ocypode ceratophthalmusOcypodidae15,564LN611669
Umalia orientalisRaninidae15,466KM365084
Lyreidus brevifronsRaninidae16,112KM983394
Homologenus malayensisHomolidae15,793KJ612407
Moloha majoraHomolidae15,903KT182069
Pseudocarcinus gigasMenippidae15,515AY562127
Myomenippe fornasiniiMenippidae15,658LK391943
Geothelphusa dehaaniPotamidae18,197AB187570
Huananpotamon lichuanensePotamidae15,380KX639824
Portunus pelagicusPortunidae16,157KM977882
Callinectes sapidusPortunidae16,263AY363392
Portunus trituberculatusPortunidae16,026AB093006
Portunus sanguinolentusPortunidae16,024KT438509
Charybdis japonicaPortunidae15,738FJ460517
Scylla paramamosainPortunidae15,824JX457150
Scylla olivaceaPortunidae15,723FJ827760
Scylla tranquebaricaPortunidae15,833FJ827759
Scylla serrataPortunidae15,775FJ827758
Charybdis feriataPortunidae15,660KF386147
Pachygrapsus crassipesGrapsidae15,652KC878511
Ilyoplax deschampsiDotillidae15,460JF909979
Damithrax spinosissimusMithracidae15,817KM405516
Macrophthalmus japonicusMacrophthalmidae16,170KU343211
Dynomene pilumnoidesDynomenidae16,475KT182070
Xenograpsus testudinatusXenograpsidae15,798EU727203
Mictyris longicarpusMictyridae15,548LN611670
Sequence annotation was performed using NCBI BLAST and the DNAStar package (DNAStar Inc. Madison, WI, USA). Alignments of sequences for each of the available Brachyura mitogenomes were performed using default settings in MAFFT, and then concatenated [19]. The sequences were aligned with those of closely related species. To remove the gaps in sequences and align each gene, poorly aligned positions and divergent regions were removed using Gblocks in our study [20]. The fasta sequences were converted to the nex format and phylip format for BI and ML, respectively. We then used DAMBE to detect the saturated conditions of the sequences [21]; the result of the DAMBE analysis was that ISS was less than ISS.c and p value was extremely significant (0.0000), suggesting that sequences was unsaturated and suit to construct phylogenetic tree. Cloverleaf secondary structure and anticodons of transfer RNAs were identified using the web-server of tRNA-scan SE [22].

Phylogenetic analysis

We estimated the taxonomic status of S. sinensis within the Decapoda by constructing the phylogenetic tree. Two concatenated datasets: amino acid alignments (AA dataset) and nucleotide alignments (NT dataset) from 42 mitogenomes PCGs were combined. Each dataset was processed using two inference methods: Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum likelihood (ML). BI was performed using MrBayes v 3.2.1 [23]. ML was performed using raxmlGUI [24]. Nucleotide substitution models were selected using Akaike information criterion implemented in Mrmodeltest v 2.3 [25]. The GTR+I+G model was chosen as the best model of nucleotide phylogenetic analysis and molecular evolution. MtArt + I+ G +F was chosen as the best model for the AA dataset, according to the results of Prottest version 1.4 [26]. There was no MtArt + I+ G +F model in MrBayes; therefore, MtREV + I+ G +F was selected as the second best model. ML analyses were performed on 1000 bootstrapped replicates [27]. The Bayesian analysis ran as 4 simultaneous MCMC chains for 10,000,000 generations, sampled every 100 generations, and a burn-in of 2,500,000 generations was used. Convergence was deduced for the Bayesian analysis on the following basis: the average standard deviation of split frequencies was less than 0.01. Additionally, we observe sufficient parameter sampling by using software Tracer v1.6. The value of ESS is more than 200. The above two points show that our data is convergent [28]. BI was performed under the GTRCAT model with the NT dataset. ML was performed with ML+rapid bootstrap under the GTRCAT model with the NT dataset. BI and ML were performed under the MtREV + I+ G +F model with the AA dataset.

Results and discussion

Genome structure and organization

The S. sinensis mitogenome is a closed circular molecule of 15,905 bp in length. It has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number KR336554 and contains typical animal mitochondrial genes, including 13 PCGs, 22 tRNA genes, a large ribosomal RNA (lrRNA) gene and a small ribosomal RNA (srRNA) genes, and CR (Table 2 and Fig 1). Twenty-three genes are coded on the majority strand and the remaining fourteen genes are transcribed on the minority strand. The S. sinensis nucleotide composition is (A) 37.4%, (T) 38.3%, (G) 9.4%, and (C) 14.9%. It shows a high A+T bias: the A+T nucleotide content is 75.7%. In addition, the A+T skew value ([A–T]/[A+T]) is –0.012, and the G+C skew value ([G–C]/[G+C]) is –0.228 [29]. The AT skew and GC skew were calculated for the selected complete mitogenomes (Table 3). The A+T skew value is in the range from –0.080 (Pachygrapsus crassipes) to 0.040 (Homologenus malayensis). The GC skew values were negative in all sequenced Brachyura mitogenomes, ranging from –0.349 (Macrophthalmus japonicus) to –0.215 (P. tripectinis). Although the AT skew and GC skew of S. sinensis are all negative, GC skew is far lower than that of AT indicates an obvious bias toward the use of As and Cs.
Table 2

Summary of mitogenome of S. sinensis.

GeneDirectionLocationSizeAnticodonStart codonStop codonIntergenic nucleotides
cox1F1–15591559ATGTAA-24
trnL2F1536–160166TAA6
cox2F1608–2315708ATGTAA-20
trnKF2296–236570TTT-1
trnDF2365–242864GTC0
atp8F2429–2587159ATGTAA-7
atp6F2581–3254674ATGTA0
cox3F3255–4045791ATGTA0
trnGF4046–411065TCC0
nad3F4111–4461351ATTTAA4
trnAF4466–452964TGC10
trnRF4540–460566TCG2
trnNF4608–467467GTT3
trnS1F4678–474467TCT0
trnEF4745–481066TTC4
trnHR4815–487864TAC2
trnFR4881–494565GAA7
nad5R4953–66801728ATGTAA19
nad4R6700–80611392ATGTAA-7
nad4LR8055–8357303ATGTAA9
trnTF8367–843266TGT0
trnPR8433–849967TGG2
nad6F8502–9004503ATTTA0
cobF9005–10,1591155ATGTAA-20
trnS2F10,140–1020667TGA19
nad1R10,226–11164939ATATAA40
trnL1R11,205–11,26864TAG0
rrnLR11,269–12,267999340
trnVR12,608–1268073TAC0
rrnSR12,681–13,5028220
CR13,503–14,2537510
trnQR14,254–14,32269TTG192
trnIF14,515–14,58167GAT47
trnMF14,629–14,69870CAT0
nad2F14,699–15,7061008ATGTAG2
trnWF15,709–15,77870TCA-3
trnCR15,776–15,83964GCA0
trnYR15,840–15,90566GTA
Fig 1

Circular map of the mitogenome of S. sinensis.

Protein coding and ribosomal genes are shown with standard abbreviations. Genes for tRNAs are abbreviated by a single letter, with S1 = AGN, S2 = UCN, L1 = CUN, and L2 = UUR. 13 Protein coding genes are yellow colored. tRNAs are purple colored. rRNAs are red colored.

Table 3

The A+T skew value and the G+C skew value of 40 Brachyura species.

SpeciesSize (bp)A %G %T %C %A+T %A+T skewG+C skew
S. sinensis15,90537.49.438.314.975.7-0.012-0.228
H. latimera16,24634.011.035.119.969.1-0.017-0.290
G. puia15,54835.110.334.819.869.90.006-0.313
P. sanguinolentus16,02431.612.934.021.565.6-0.037-0.243
E. j. sinensis16,37835.210.836.417.671.6-0.016-0.243
E. j. hepuensis16,33535.110.836.417.771.5-0.018-0.245
E. j. japonica16,35235.210.736.517.771.7-0.018-0.245
X. testudinatus15,79836.79.337.216.873.9-0.007-0.297
P. gigas15,51535.010.835.518.770.5-0.006-0.268
G. dehaani18,19736.98.338.016.874.9-0.014-0.341
L. brevifrons16,11234.211.336.418.170.6-0.031-0.231
C. sapidus16,26334.211.134.919.869.1-0.011-0.279
P. trituberculatus16,02633.311.336.918.570.2-0.051-0.241
H. malayensis15,79337.310.034.418.371.70.040-0.292
C. japonica15,73833.811.935.418.969.2-0.024-0.228
S. paramamosain15,82434.910.138.216.873.1-0.045-0.247
U. orientalis15,46633.111.834.920.268.0-0.027-0.262
S. olivacea15,72333.511.235.919.469.4-0.035-0.267
S. tranquebarica15,83335.09.838.716.573.7-0.050-0.258
S. serrata15,77534.510.438.017.172.5-0.047-0.242
D. spinosissimus15,81733.310.536.819.470.1-0.050-0.294
C. feriata15,66034.111.236.118.670.2-0.028-0.246
G. yunohana15,56734.310.835.619.369.9-0.019-0.281
P. pelagicus16,15733.712.235.019.168.8-0.019-0.219
A. alayseae15,62034.411.432.421.866.80.029-0.316
A. rodriguezensis15,61135.310.333.520.968.80.025-0.341
P. crassipes15,65230.512.735.821.066.3-0.080-0.245
I. deschampsi15,46034.110.735.519.769.6-0.019-0.294
O. cordimanus15,60431.811.934.521.866.3-0.043-0.293
P. tripectinis15,61236.210.138.015.774.2-0.023-0.215
M. japonicus16,17033.610.932.822.766.40.014-0.349
S. neglectum15,92037.49.538.214.975.6-0.010-0.219
M. depressus1576537.98.739.414.077.3-0.0038-0.231
O. ceratophthalmus15,56433.711.135.819.469.5-0.029-0.269
D. pilumnoides16,47537.59.534.718.372.20.037-0.316
M. majora15,90338.49.835.516.373.90.039-0.248
H. lichuanense15,38035.89.337.417.573.2-0.023-0.305
M. fornasinii15,65835.59.936.118.571.6-0.0087-0.303
C. granulosus16,30033.211.236.119.569.3-0.043-0.272
M. longicarpus15,54832.411.836.619.269.0-0.060-0.236

Circular map of the mitogenome of S. sinensis.

Protein coding and ribosomal genes are shown with standard abbreviations. Genes for tRNAs are abbreviated by a single letter, with S1 = AGN, S2 = UCN, L1 = CUN, and L2 = UUR. 13 Protein coding genes are yellow colored. tRNAs are purple colored. rRNAs are red colored.

Protein-coding genes

The mitogenome of S. sinensis contains 13 PCGs, starting with the typical ATN codons (Table 2). One (nad1) starts with ATA, two (nad3, nad6) with ATT, and ten (cox1, cox2, atp8, atp6, cox3, cob, nad2, nad5, nad4, and nad4l) with ATG. Nine PCGs (cox1, cox2, atp8, nad3, nad5, nad4, nad4l, cob, and nad1) have a complete TAA stop codon, while the remaining four terminate with either TA (atp6, cox3, and nad6) or TAG (nad2). Nine PCGs (cox1, cox2, atp8, atp6, cox3, nad3, nad6, cob, and nad2) are encoded on the majority strand, while the rest are encoded on the minority strand. The A+T content was 74.0% and AT skew was –0.163 (S1 Table). The RSCU (relative synonymous codon usage) values for S. sinensis for the third positions is shown in Fig 2A and Table 4. The codon usage is biased: there is a high frequency of AT compared with GC in the third codon position, which is consistent with other crabs. The most common amino acids in mitochondrial proteins are Leu (UUR), Ile and Phe (Fig 2B).
Fig 2

Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) in S. sinensis mitogenome (A). Amino acid composition in the mitogenome of S. sinensis (B).

Table 4

RSCU (relative synonymous codon usage) of S. sinensis.

CodonCountRSCUCodonCountRSCUCodonCountRSCUCodonCountRSCU
UUU(F)3141.76UCU(S)1062.41UAU(Y)1321.69UGU(C)321.83
UUC(F)420.24UCC(S)140.32UAC(Y)240.31UGC(C)30.17
UUA(L)4084.2UCA(S)1022.32UAA(*)111.83UGA(W)981.9
UUG(L)350.36UCG(S)30.07UAG(*)10.17UGG(W)50.1
CUU(L)700.72CCU(P)772.15CAU(H)591.55CGU(R)191.41
CUC(L)90.09CCC(P)140.39CAC(H)170.45CGC(R)00
CUA(L)550.57CCA(P)501.4CAA(Q)681.81CGA(R)302.22
CUG(L)60.06CCG(P)20.06CAG(Q)70.19CGG(R)50.37
AUU(I)3251.83ACU(T)882.11AAU(N)1401.74AGU(S)400.91
AUC(I)310.17ACC(T)100.24AAC(N)210.26AGC(S)10.02
AUA(M)2091.81ACA(T)671.6AAA(K)861.74AGA(S)741.68
AUG(M)220.19ACG(T)20.05AAG(K)130.26AGG(S)120.27
GUU(V)921.69GCU(A)1092.26GAU(D)631.77GGU(G)821.48
GUC(V)70.13GCC(A)190.39GAC(D)80.23GGC(G)60.11
GUA(V)991.82GCA(A)601.24GAA(E)701.82GGA(G)1192.15
GUG(V)200.37GCG(A)50.1GAG(E)70.18GGG(G)140.25

Transfer RNAs, ribosomal RNAs, and control region

The S. sinensis mitogenome contains 22 tRNA genes, as do most Brachyura mtDNAs. The tRNA genes range from 64 to 73 bp. Fourteen tRNA genes are encoded on the majority strand and eight are encoded on then minority strand (Table 2). All the tRNA genes have a typical cloverleaf structure, except for the trnS1 gene, whose dihydroxyuridine (DHU) arm had been simplified down to a loop (Fig 3). The loss of the DHU arm is common in animal mitogenomes and has been considered a typical feature of metazoan mitogenomes [30-34]. The cloverleaf secondary structures of 19 transfer RNAs were identified using the web-server of tRNA-scan SE. The three tRNAs not detected by tRNAscan-SE were determined in the unannotated regions by sequence similarity to tRNAs of other crabs. The average AT content of the tRNA genes is 74.6%; their AT skew and GCskew are all negative (S1 Table), showing an obvious bias toward the use of Ts and Cs. Two rRNA genes were identified on the minority strand in the S. sinensis, with the lrRNA gene located between trnL (CUN) and trnV, and the srRNA gene located between trnV and CR, respectively. The lrRNA gene is 999 bp and the srRNA gene is 822 bp long. The AT-skew of rRNAs (0.001), the GC-skew of rRNAs (–0.296) shows clearly that more As and more Cs than Ts and Gs in rRNAs (S1 Table). CR is located between rrns and trnQ. The average AT content of the CR is 83.2%. The overall AT-skew and GC-skew in the CR of S. sinensis are 0.107 and −0.111, respectively (S1 Table), indicating an obvious bias toward the use of As and Cs.
Fig 3

Secondary structures of 22 transfer tRNA genes of S. sinensis.

Gene rearrangement

In Pancrustaceans, the tRNA gene order between CR and trnM is trnI-trnQ [35,36] (Fig 4A). The arrangement of the tRNA genes between CR and trnM is trnQ-trnI in S. sinensis (Fig 4G). The tRNA rearrangements are generally considered to be a consequence of tandem duplication of part of the mitogenome [37,38]. The arrangement of the tRNA gene between trnE and trnF is trnH in S. sinensis, which is different from the tRNA genes arrangement of the Pancrustacean ground pattern. In most arthropods, trnH is between nad4 and nad5 [39], whereas it was found between trnE and trnF in S. sinensis. The phenomenon of gene rearrangements in the mitochondrial genome is a relatively common event in crustacean species [40]. The gene order of S. sinensis is identical to that of S. neglectum [41], M. depressus and P. tripectinis (Fig 4G), which supports the view that S. sinensis belongs to the Grapsoidea, Sesarmidae. The above results suggested that S. sinensis, S. neglectum, M. depressus and P. tripectinis are sister groups.
Fig 4

Linearized represantation of gene rearrangements of Brachyura circle mitogeomes.

All genes are transcribed from left to right. tRNA genes are exhibited by the corresponding single-letter amino acid code with S1 = AGN, S2 = UCN, L1 = CUN, and L2 = UUR. CR represents control region. rrnL, rrnS, large and small subunit ribosomal RNA.

Linearized represantation of gene rearrangements of Brachyura circle mitogeomes.

All genes are transcribed from left to right. tRNA genes are exhibited by the corresponding single-letter amino acid code with S1 = AGN, S2 = UCN, L1 = CUN, and L2 = UUR. CR represents control region. rrnL, rrnS, large and small subunit ribosomal RNA. As shown in Fig 4B, the gene orders of these species are identical. The order of the genes in the mitogenome of S. sinensis is different from that in these Brachyura mitogenomes sequences because of the rearrangement of two tRNA genes between CR and trnM. The arrangement of the tRNA genes is trnQ- trnI between CR and trnM in S. sinensis, which is different from the trnI-trnQ of the these Brachyura species. In this case, the tandem duplication of the gene regions that include trnI, trnQ, and trnM, followed by losses of the supernumerary genes might represent the most ideal mechanism for mitochondrial gene rearrangement [42-44]. It is believed that slipped-strand mispairing takes place first, followed by gene deletion [45]. The gene orders of Eriocheir japonica sinensis [46], E. j. hepuensis, E. j. japonica, Helice latimera, Cyclograpsus granulosus and M. japonicus are same (Fig 4C). H. latimera, C. granulosus, E. j. sinensis, E. j. hepuensis, and E. j. japonica belong to the Grapoidea, Varunidae [47]. Phylogenetic analyses were based on two datasets: the AA datasets and the NT datasets using two methods (BI and ML) and alignment method of MAFFT, the topologies of phylogenetic analysis in BI and ML were roughly the same, with some slight differences. S. sinensis and S. neglectum were clustered in one branch in the phylogenetic tree with high nodal support values in BI and ML trees. (S. sinensis + S. neglectum) clade is well supported to be the sister group to the (P. tripectinis + M. depressus) clade. This supported the view that S. sinensis belongs to the Grapoidea, Sesarmidae, which is consistent with the results of the gene rearrangement analysis. H. latimera, C. granulosus, E. j. sinensis, E. j. hepuensis, and E. j. japonica clustered together with high statistical support (Figs 5 and 6), showing that these species have sister group relationships and belong to Grapsoidea, Varunidae. P. crassipes belong to the Grapoidea, Grapsidae [48]. Previous studies noted an ambiguous classification for Ilyoplax deschampsi. I. deschampsi is part of the Dotillidae in this ambiguous classification. The phylogenetic position of I. deschampsi is within the Grapsoidea [2,49,50]. The real phylogenetic position of I. deschampsi should be closer to the Grapsoidea species that shown in Figs 5 and 6. Xenograpsus testudinatus, originally placed in the Varunidae, has been transferred to its own family (Xenograpsidae) [51].
Fig 5

Inferred phylogenetic relationship among Brachyura based on nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial 13PCGs using BI and ML.

C. destructor and C. similis were used as outgroups.

Fig 6

Inferred phylogenetic relationship among Brachyura based on amino acid sequences of mitochondrial 13PCGs using BI and ML.

C. destructor and C. similis were used as outgroups.

Inferred phylogenetic relationship among Brachyura based on nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial 13PCGs using BI and ML.

C. destructor and C. similis were used as outgroups.

Inferred phylogenetic relationship among Brachyura based on amino acid sequences of mitochondrial 13PCGs using BI and ML.

C. destructor and C. similis were used as outgroups. BI and ML trees of the nucleotide sequences and amino acid sequences of mitochondrial 13 PCGs (Figs 5 and 6) with C. destructor and C. similis as outgroups generated identical tree topologies. The section Eybrachyura crabs consist of four groups, one comprising famlies of Heterotremata, the second Thoracotremata famlies, the third Potamoidea crabs, and the fourth Raninoida species. All the bootstrap values for the branches separating these groups are high. The resulting phylogeny supports the establishment of a separate subsection Potamoida corresponding to Group 3. The present molecular study gives additional evidence for the Potamoida status in these taxa. In all trees Potamoida does closely cluster with subsection Thoracotremata. The relationship between Potamoida and Thoracotremata is much closer than it between the former and Heterotremata, which was proposed by Bowman and Abele [4]. These four subsections (groups) constitute a monophyletic sister group to Section Dromiacea (Group 5) in all phylogenetic trees.

Conclusion

This study presents one mitogenome of S. sinensis. The mitogenome contains 13 PCGs, 22 tRNA genes, two rRNA genes and CR. The AT skew and the GC skew are both negative in the mitogenomes of S. sinensis, indicating an obvious bias toward the use of Ts and Cs, which is consistent with most sequenced brachyuran crabs. The gene arrangement of S. sinensis is identical to that of S. neglectum, P. tripectinis and M. depressus. In comparison to Pancrustacean ground pattern and common arrangement for brachyuran crabs, S. sinensis exhibits a novel rearrangement. Tandem duplication followed by random deletion is widely considered to explain generation of gene rearrangement of mitogenome in S. sinensis. The phylogenetic analyses indicate that S. sinensis and S. neglectum have sister group relationships, and the clade (S. sinensis + S. neglectum) is well supported to be the sister group to (P. tripectinis + M. depressus), suggesting that S. sinensis should belong to Grapoidea, Sesarmidae. The topology of BI and ML trees of Brachyura species (Fig 5) inferred from nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial 13 PCGs sequences are similar to those of Fig 6 constructed from amino acid sequences of whole mitogenomes. The resulting phylogeny strongly supports the establishment of a separate subsection Potamoida, so section Eubrachyura consists of four subsections which are Raninoida, Heterotremata, Potamoida, and Thoracotremata. However, the four subsections and two sections are monophyletic, respectively, whereas the relationships within families of each subsection were not resolved absolutely in the present study.

Composition and skewness in the S. sinensis mitogenome.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  32 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Changing identities: tRNA duplication and remolding within animal mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Timothy A Rawlings; Timothy M Collins; Rudiger Bieler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The complete mitochondrial genomes of Umalia orientalis and Lyreidus brevifrons: The phylogenetic position of the family Raninidae within Brachyuran crabs.

Authors:  Guohui Shi; Zhaoxia Cui; Min Hui; Yuan Liu; Tin-Yam Chan; Chengwen Song
Journal:  Mar Genomics       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.710

4.  Patterns of nucleotide composition at fourfold degenerate sites of animal mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  N T Perna; T D Kocher
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Molecular systematics of the Asian mitten crabs, genus Eriocheir (Crustacea: Brachyura).

Authors:  Boping Tang; Kaiya Zhou; Daxiang Song; Guang Yang; Aiyun Dai
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  Significance of the sexual openings and supplementary structures on the phylogeny of brachyuran crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura), with new nomina for higher-ranked podotreme taxa.

Authors:  Danièle Guinot; Marcos Tavares; Peter Castro
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.091

7.  The complete mitochondrial genomes of two ghost moths, Thitarodes renzhiensis and Thitarodes yunnanensis: the ancestral gene arrangement in Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Yong-Qiang Cao; Chuan Ma; Ji-Yue Chen; Da-Rong Yang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Improved systematic tRNA gene annotation allows new insights into the evolution of mitochondrial tRNA structures and into the mechanisms of mitochondrial genome rearrangements.

Authors:  Frank Jühling; Joern Pütz; Matthias Bernt; Alexander Donath; Martin Middendorf; Catherine Florentz; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The complete mitochondrial genome of the sea spider Nymphon gracile (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida).

Authors:  Lars Podsiadlowski; Anke Braband
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Tandem Duplication and Random Loss for mitogenome rearrangement in Symphurus (Teleost: Pleuronectiformes).

Authors:  Wei Shi; Li Gong; Shu-Ying Wang; Xian-Guang Miao; Xiao-Yu Kong
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  7 in total

1.  Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Bromeliad Crab Metopaulias depressus (Rathbun, 1896) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae).

Authors:  Milena A Rodriguez-Pilco; Peter Leśny; Lars Podsiadłowski; Christoph D Schubart; Juan Antonio Baeza
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Comparison of the complete mitochondrial genome of Phyllophorus liuwutiensis (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea: Phyllophoridae) to that of other sea cucumbers.

Authors:  Fuyuan Yang; Chen Zhou; Ngoc Tuan Tran; Zaiqiao Sun; Jianshao Wu; Hui Ge; Zhen Lu; Chenhui Zhong; Zhihuang Zhu; Qiuhua Yang; Qi Lin
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.693

3.  Comparative Mitochondrial Genome Analysis of Two Ectomycorrhizal Fungi (Rhizopogon) Reveals Dynamic Changes of Intron and Phylogenetic Relationships of the Subphylum Agaricomycotina.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Yuanhang Ren; Xiaodong Shi; Lianxin Peng; Jianglin Zhao; Yu Song; Gang Zhao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Phylogenetic Relationships and Adaptation in Deep-Sea Mussels: Insights from Mitochondrial Genomes.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Jin Sun; Ting Xu; Jian-Wen Qiu; Pei-Yuan Qian
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  The complete mitochondrial genome of the freshwater crab Potamiscus motuoensis (Decapoda: Brachyura: Potamoidea).

Authors:  Songbo Wang; Yifan Wang; Yangjin Zhuoma; Ling Tong; Zongheng Nie; Xinnan Jia; Chunchao Zhu; Xianmin Zhou; Jiexin Zou
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 0.658

6.  The First Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Eucrate crenata (Decapoda: Brachyura: Goneplacidae) and Phylogenetic Relationships within Infraorder Brachyura.

Authors:  Xiaoke Pang; Chenglong Han; Biao Guo; Kefeng Liu; Xiaolong Lin; Xueqiang Lu
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.141

7.  Chromosome-level genome assembly reveals the unique genome evolution of the swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus).

Authors:  Boping Tang; Daizhen Zhang; Haorong Li; Senhao Jiang; Huabin Zhang; Fujun Xuan; Baoming Ge; Zhengfei Wang; Yu Liu; Zhongli Sha; Yongxu Cheng; Wei Jiang; Hui Jiang; Zhongkai Wang; Kun Wang; Chaofeng Li; Yue Sun; Shusheng She; Qiang Qiu; Wen Wang; Xinzheng Li; Yongxin Li; Qiuning Liu; Yandong Ren
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.524

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.