Literature DB >> 28617633

When Predators Help Prey Adapt and Persist in a Changing Environment.

Matthew M Osmond, Sarah P Otto, Christopher A Klausmeier.   

Abstract

To persist in a changing world, populations must adapt. The ability to adapt is influenced by interactions with other species, such as predators. Recent experiments and theory suggest that selective pressures arising from predation may help prey adapt phenotypically to changing environments, but how this influences persistence remains unclear. In particular, it has not yet been shown whether predator-induced adaptation can outweigh predator-imposed reductions in population size, allowing prey to persist when they would otherwise go extinct. Here we examine if (and if so, how) predation can enhance the ability of prey to persist in a directionally changing environment. To do so, we extend a single-species quantitative-genetics framework that predicts rates of environmental change beyond which populations go extinct. While we assume predation decreases prey density, we find that predators can indeed help prey persist if they sufficiently increase prey adaptedness (decrease phenotypic lag). We show two ways this can occur: (1) the selective push, in which predators consume maladapted individuals and thus add selection that pushes the mean prey trait toward its optimum; and (2) the evolutionary hydra effect, when predation reduces prey density and thereby increases prey birthrate, allowing more selective events per unit time and effectively reducing generation time. We also discuss how our results apply more broadly to sources of mortality beyond predation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; coevolution; evolutionary rescue; extinction; quantitative genetics; trophic interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28617633     DOI: 10.1086/691778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  8 in total

1.  Selective harvest focused on sexual signal traits can lead to extinction under directional environmental change.

Authors:  Robert J Knell; Carlos Martínez-Ruiz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The conflict between adaptation and dispersal for maintaining biodiversity in changing environments.

Authors:  Patrick L Thompson; Emanuel A Fronhofer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Change in prey genotype frequency rescues predator from extinction.

Authors:  Ruben Joseph Hermann; Lutz Becks
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.653

Review 4.  Ecological limits to evolutionary rescue.

Authors:  Christopher A Klausmeier; Matthew M Osmond; Colin T Kremer; Elena Litchman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Trophic structure modulates community rescue following acidification.

Authors:  Graham Bell; Vincent Fugère; Rowan Barrett; Beatrix Beisner; Melania Cristescu; Gregor Fussmann; Jesse Shapiro; Andrew Gonzalez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Evidence of local adaptation in a waterfall-climbing Hawaiian goby fish derived from coupled biophysical modeling of larval dispersal and post-settlement selection.

Authors:  Kristine N Moody; Johanna L K Wren; Donald R Kobayashi; Michael J Blum; Margaret B Ptacek; Richard W Blob; Robert J Toonen; Heiko L Schoenfuss; Michael J Childress
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Species interactions mediate thermal evolution.

Authors:  M Tseng; Joey R Bernhardt; Alexander E Chila
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 8.  How frequency-dependent selection affects population fitness, maladaptation and evolutionary rescue.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.183

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.