| Literature DB >> 30975077 |
Kristine N Moody1,2,3, Johanna L K Wren4,5,6, Donald R Kobayashi6, Michael J Blum7,8, Margaret B Ptacek9, Richard W Blob9, Robert J Toonen10, Heiko L Schoenfuss11, Michael J Childress9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Local adaptation of marine and diadromous species is thought to be a product of larval dispersal, settlement mortality, and differential reproductive success, particularly in heterogeneous post-settlement habitats. We evaluated this premise with an oceanographic passive larval dispersal model coupled with individual-based models of post-settlement selection and reproduction to infer conditions that underlie local adaptation in Sicyopterus stimpsoni, an amphidromous Hawaiian goby known for its ability to climb waterfalls.Entities:
Keywords: Hawai‘i; individual-based models; larval transport; morphology; oceanography
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30975077 PMCID: PMC6458715 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-019-1413-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Passive larval dispersal connectivity matrices from May 2nd 2009 to March 31st 2014. The values in each cell are the rearward settlement probabilities for each receiving stream and the corresponding island. Each panel represents a total of 365 days, which coincides with breaks in the El Niño Southern Oscillation during the aforementioned time period. High values (yellow-orange) indicate high connectivity between streams (islands) and low values (dark purple-black) indicate low connectivity between streams (islands)
Fig. 2Simulated counts of larval and adult morphotypes for 200 generations on the islands of Kaua‘i, O‘ahu, and the Big Island from the individual-based models of isolation without post-settlement selection (scenario 1). Warm colors represent climbing morphotypes (M1-M4) and cool colors represent predation evasion morphotypes (M7-M10)
Fig. 3Simulated counts of adult morphotypes for 200 generations on the islands of Kaua‘i (a), O‘ahu (b), and the Big Island (c) from the individual-based models of isolation with varying levels (0 to 1) of post-settlement selection of predation (columns) and climbing (rows) (scenario 2). Warm colors represent climbing morphotypes (M1-M4) and cool colors represent predation evasion morphotypes (M7-M10)
Selection differentials. Selection differentials calculated from the post-settlement selection IBMs for each island without immigration (scenario 2) and with immigration (scenario 4)
| Island | Metric | Stage change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without immigration (scenario 2) | 1-2 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 4-5 | 5-6 | 6-7 | 7-8 | 8-9 | 9-10 | |
| Kaua‘i | min | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| max | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.29 | |
| average | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| O‘ahu | min | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| max | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.26 | |
| average | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Big Island | min | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| max | 0.10 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.21 | |
| average | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| With immigration (scenario 4) | ||||||||||
| Kaua‘i | min | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| max | 0.09 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.30 | |
| mean | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
| O‘ahu | min | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| max | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.36 | |
| average | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
| Big Island | min | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| max | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.25 | |
| average | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
Generalized linear models of selection coefficients. GLMs of selection coefficients for post-settlement selection IBMs for each island (Kaua‘i, O‘ahu, and the Big Island) without immigration (scenario 2) and with immigration (scenario 4).
| Island | Parameter | Coefficient | t-value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without immigration (scenario 2) | ||||
| Kaua‘i | stage | 0.0005 | 9.39 | < 0.0001 |
| predation probability | -0.0047 | -5.59 | < 0.0001 | |
| climbing probability | -0.0009 | -1.17 | 0.24 | |
| predation probability × climbing probability | 0.0018 | 1.33 | 0.18 | |
| O‘ahu | stage | 0.0007 | 7.06 | < 0.0001 |
| predation probability | -0.006 | -4.19 | < 0.0001 | |
| climbing probability | -0.004 | -2.84 | 0.005 | |
| predation probability × climbing probability | 0.004 | 2.09 | 0.038 | |
| Big Island | stage | 0.0006 | 6.81 | < 0.0001 |
| predation probability | 0.0009 | 0.68 | 0.50 | |
| climbing probability | -0.0001 | -0.09 | 0.93 | |
| predation probability × climbing probability | 0.0001 | 0.03 | 0.97 | |
| With immigration (scenario 4) | ||||
| Kaua‘i | stage | 0.0012 | 4.61 | < 0.0001 |
| immigration rate | -0.0105 | -2.46 | 0.01 | |
| predation probability | 0.0022 | 0.46 | 0.65 | |
| immigration rate × predation probability | 0.0289 | 4.13 | < 0.0001 | |
| O‘ahu | stage | 0.0015 | 6.63 | < 0.0001 |
| immigration rate | 0.0053 | 1.49 | 0.14 | |
| predation probability | 0.0193 | 4.90 | < 0.0001 | |
| immigration rate × predation probability | -0.0038 | -0.66 | 0.51 | |
| Big Island | stage | 0.0008 | 5.24 | < 0.0001 |
| immigration rate | -0.0003 | -0.12 | 0.91 | |
| predation probability | 0.069 | 2.37 | 0.02 | |
| immigration rate × predation probability | 0.0013 | 0.31 | 0.76 | |
Redundancy analysis (RDA) models of morphological evolution. RDAs of morphological evolution for post-settlement selection IBMs for each island without immigration (scenario 2) and with immigration (scenario 4). * P < 0.0001
| Island | R2adj | F(4,250867) | Model parameter | Coefficient | Variance partitioned (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without immigration (scenario 2) | |||||
| Kaua‘i | 0.65 | 113964* | year | -0.99 | 0.63* |
| predation selection | 0.99 | 16.10* | |||
| climbing selection | -0.01 | 0.06* | |||
| predation selection × climbing selection | 0.67 | 0.02* | |||
| O‘ahu | 0.89 | 553293* | year | -0.02 | 0.06* |
| predation selection | 0.99 | 19.96* | |||
| climbing selection | -0.04 | 0.04* | |||
| predation selection × climbing selection | 0.66 | 0.23* | |||
| Big Island | 0.87 | 407005* | year | -0.13 | 1.52* |
| predation selection | 0.98 | 24.42* | |||
| climbing selection | 0.64 | 0.86* | |||
| predation selection × climbing selection | 0.67 | 0.05* | |||
| With immigration (scenario 4) | |||||
| Kaua‘i | 0.94 | 896157* | year | -0.01 | < 0.001 * |
| immigration rate | -0.23 | 0.02 * | |||
| predation selection | 0.96 | 25.93* | |||
| immigration rate × predation selection | 0.60 | 1.93* | |||
| O‘ahu | 0.92 | 587798* | year | -0.02 | < 0.001* |
| immigration rate | -0.29 | 1.37* | |||
| predation selection | 0.89 | 43.23* | |||
| immigration rate × predation selection | 0.43 | 11.50* | |||
| Big Island | 0.78 | 187930* | year | -0.04 | < 0.001 * |
| immigration rate | -0.11 | 2.90* | |||
| predation selection | 0.95 | 33.28* | |||
| immigration rate × predation selection | 0.59 | 6.57* | |||
Fig. 4Simulated counts of larval and adult morphotypes for 200 generations on the islands of Kaua‘i, O‘ahu, and the Big Island from the individual-based models of immigration without post-settlement selection (scenario 3). Warm colors represent climbing morphotypes (M1-M4) and cool colors represent predation evasion morphotypes (M7-M10)
Fig. 5Simulated counts of adult morphotypes for 200 generations on the islands of Kaua‘i, O‘ahu, and the Big Island from the individual-based models of immigration (ranging from 25%-100%) with varying levels (0.25 to 1) of post-settlement predation selection (scenario 4). Warm colors represent climbing morphotypes (M1-M4) and cool colors represent predation evasion morphotypes (M7-M10)
Fig. 6Locations of Hawaiian streams used as release/recapture points in the passive larval dispersal model