Literature DB >> 33131439

Ecological limits to evolutionary rescue.

Christopher A Klausmeier1,2,3,4, Matthew M Osmond5, Colin T Kremer1, Elena Litchman1,3,4.   

Abstract

Environments change, for both natural and anthropogenic reasons, which can threaten species persistence. Evolutionary adaptation is a potentially powerful mechanism to allow species to persist in these changing environments. To determine the conditions under which adaptation will prevent extinction (evolutionary rescue), classic quantitative genetics models have assumed a constantly changing environment. They predict that species traits will track a moving environmental optimum with a lag that approaches a constant. If fitness is negative at this lag, the species will go extinct. There have been many elaborations of these models incorporating increased genetic realism. Here, we review and explore the consequences of four ecological complications: non-quadratic fitness functions, interacting density- and trait-dependence, species interactions and fundamental limits to adaptation. We show that non-quadratic fitness functions can result in evolutionary tipping points and existential crises, as can the interaction between density- and trait-dependent mortality. We then review the literature on how interspecific interactions affect adaptation and persistence. Finally, we suggest an alternative theoretical framework that considers bounded environmental change and fundamental limits to adaptation. A research programme that combines theory and experiments and integrates across organizational scales will be needed to predict whether adaptation will prevent species extinction in changing environments. This article is part of the theme issue 'Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; eco-evolutionary dynamics; environmental change; evolutionary rescue; moving optimum; quantitative genetics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33131439      PMCID: PMC7662203          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  45 in total

1.  Genetic and demographic parameters determining population persistence after a discrete change in the environment.

Authors:  E G Boulding; T Hay
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Demographic factors and genetic variation influence population persistence under environmental change.

Authors:  Yvonne Willi; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Genome-wide evolutionary response to a heat wave in Drosophila.

Authors:  Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles; Rosa Tarrío; Mauro Santos
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Rapid thermal adaptation in a marine diatom reveals constraints and trade-offs.

Authors:  Daniel R O'Donnell; Carolyn R Hamman; Evan C Johnson; Colin T Kremer; Christopher A Klausmeier; Elena Litchman
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Is evolution predictable? Quantitative genetics under complex genotype-phenotype maps.

Authors:  Lisandro Milocco; Isaac Salazar-Ciudad
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations.

Authors:  Sally N Aitken; Sam Yeaman; Jason A Holliday; Tongli Wang; Sierra Curtis-McLane
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Species interactions alter evolutionary responses to a novel environment.

Authors:  Diane Lawrence; Francesca Fiegna; Volker Behrends; Jacob G Bundy; Albert B Phillimore; Thomas Bell; Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Trophic structure modulates community rescue following acidification.

Authors:  Graham Bell; Vincent Fugère; Rowan Barrett; Beatrix Beisner; Melania Cristescu; Gregor Fussmann; Jesse Shapiro; Andrew Gonzalez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient.

Authors:  Viktoriia Radchuk; Thomas Reed; Céline Teplitsky; Martijn van de Pol; Anne Charmantier; Christopher Hassall; Peter Adamík; Frank Adriaensen; Markus P Ahola; Peter Arcese; Jesús Miguel Avilés; Javier Balbontin; Karl S Berg; Antoni Borras; Sarah Burthe; Jean Clobert; Nina Dehnhard; Florentino de Lope; André A Dhondt; Niels J Dingemanse; Hideyuki Doi; Tapio Eeva; Joerns Fickel; Iolanda Filella; Frode Fossøy; Anne E Goodenough; Stephen J G Hall; Bengt Hansson; Michael Harris; Dennis Hasselquist; Thomas Hickler; Jasmin Joshi; Heather Kharouba; Juan Gabriel Martínez; Jean-Baptiste Mihoub; James A Mills; Mercedes Molina-Morales; Arne Moksnes; Arpat Ozgul; Deseada Parejo; Philippe Pilard; Maud Poisbleau; Francois Rousset; Mark-Oliver Rödel; David Scott; Juan Carlos Senar; Constanti Stefanescu; Bård G Stokke; Tamotsu Kusano; Maja Tarka; Corey E Tarwater; Kirsten Thonicke; Jack Thorley; Andreas Wilting; Piotr Tryjanowski; Juha Merilä; Ben C Sheldon; Anders Pape Møller; Erik Matthysen; Fredric Janzen; F Stephen Dobson; Marcel E Visser; Steven R Beissinger; Alexandre Courtiol; Stephanie Kramer-Schadt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Quantitative assessment of the importance of phenotypic plasticity in adaptation to climate change in wild bird populations.

Authors:  Oscar Vedder; Sandra Bouwhuis; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation.

Authors:  Helmut Hillebrand; Ute Jacob; Heather M Leslie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Phase transitions in biology: from bird flocks to population dynamics.

Authors:  Elleard F W Heffern; Holly Huelskamp; Sonya Bahar; R Fredrik Inglis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Adaptive and nonadaptive plasticity in changing environments: Implications for sexual species with different life history strategies.

Authors:  Daniel Romero-Mujalli; Markus Rochow; Sandra Kahl; Sofia Paraskevopoulou; Remco Folkertsma; Florian Jeltsch; Ralph Tiedemann
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Evolution reverses the effect of network structure on metapopulation persistence.

Authors:  Lisa C McManus; Edward W Tekwa; Daniel E Schindler; Timothy E Walsworth; Madhavi A Colton; Michael M Webster; Timothy E Essington; Daniel L Forrest; Stephen R Palumbi; Peter J Mumby; Malin L Pinsky
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.499

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.