Literature DB >> 28617416

Genome-wide cfDNA screening: clinical laboratory experience with the first 10,000 cases.

Mathias Ehrich1, John Tynan1, Amin Mazloom1, Eyad Almasri1, Ron McCullough1, Theresa Boomer1, Daniel Grosu1, Jason Chibuk1.   

Abstract

PurposeInvasive diagnostic prenatal testing can provide the most comprehensive information about the genetic status of a fetus. Noninvasive prenatal screening methods, especially when using cell-free DNA (cfDNA), are often limited to reporting only on trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidies. This can leave a significant number of chromosomal and subchromosomal copy-number variations undetected. In 2015, we launched a new genome-wide cfDNA screening test that has the potential to narrow this detection gap.MethodsHere, we review the results from the first 10,000 cases submitted to the Sequenom clinical laboratory for genome-wide cfDNA screening.ResultsThe high-risk indication for this cohort differed compared with standard cfDNA screening. More samples were submitted with ultrasound indications (25% compared with 13% for standard cfDNA screening) and fewer for advanced maternal age (51% for genome-wide screening versus 68% for standard cfDNA screening). A total of 554 positive calls were made, of which 164 were detectable only via genome-wide analysis.ConclusionThis reports indicates a difference in utilization compared with standard cfDNA screening, where positivity rates are higher and a large subset of positive calls could not have been made using standard cfDNA screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28617416     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  23 in total

1.  Risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first-trimester screening for Down syndrome: a national cohort of 147,987 singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  C B Wulff; T A Gerds; L Rode; C K Ekelund; O B Petersen; A Tabor
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  Confined placental mosaicism for trisomies 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 16, and 22: their incidence, likely origins, and mechanisms for cell lineage compartmentalization.

Authors:  J Wolstenholme
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Detection of fetal subchromosomal abnormalities by sequencing circulating cell-free DNA from maternal plasma.

Authors:  Chen Zhao; John Tynan; Mathias Ehrich; Gregory Hannum; Ron McCullough; Juan-Sebastian Saldivar; Paul Oeth; Dirk van den Boom; Cosmin Deciu
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: an association with poor perinatal outcome.

Authors:  A Johnson; R J Wapner; G H Davis; L G Jackson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Validation of targeted sequencing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for non-invasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y.

Authors:  K H Nicolaides; A Syngelaki; M Gil; V Atanasova; D Markova
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Noninvasive prenatal detection of sex chromosomal aneuploidies by sequencing circulating cell-free DNA from maternal plasma.

Authors:  Amin R Mazloom; Željko Džakula; Paul Oeth; Huiquan Wang; Taylor Jensen; John Tynan; Ron McCullough; Juan-Sebastian Saldivar; Mathias Ehrich; Dirk van den Boom; Allan T Bombard; Margo Maeder; Graham McLennan; Wendy Meschino; Glenn E Palomaki; Jacob A Canick; Cosmin Deciu
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Cell-free DNA vs sequential screening for the detection of fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Mary E Norton; Rebecca J Baer; Ronald J Wapner; Miriam Kuppermann; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Robert J Currier
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  First- and second-trimester evaluation of risk for Down syndrome.

Authors:  Robert H Ball; Aaron B Caughey; Fergal D Malone; David A Nyberg; Christine H Comstock; George R Saade; Richard L Berkowitz; Susan J Gross; Lorraine Dugoff; Sabrina D Craigo; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Danielle Emig; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Anthony R Gregg; Brian G Skotko; Judith L Benkendorf; Kristin G Monaghan; Komal Bajaj; Robert G Best; Susan Klugman; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Mindy P Dabell; Allan J Fisher; Justine Coppinger; Anne M Bandholz; Jay W Ellison; J Britt Ravnan; Beth S Torchia; Blake C Ballif; Jill A Rosenfeld
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  15 in total

1.  TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Karuna R M van der Meij; Erik A Sistermans; Merryn V E Macville; Servi J C Stevens; Caroline J Bax; Mireille N Bekker; Caterina M Bilardo; Elles M J Boon; Marjan Boter; Karin E M Diderich; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Leonie K Duin; Brigitte H W Faas; Ilse Feenstra; Monique C Haak; Mariëtte J V Hoffer; Nicolette S den Hollander; Iris H I M Hollink; Fernanda S Jehee; Maarten F C M Knapen; Angelique J A Kooper; Irene M van Langen; Klaske D Lichtenbelt; Ingeborg H Linskens; Merel C van Maarle; Dick Oepkes; Mijntje J Pieters; G Heleen Schuring-Blom; Esther Sikkel; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Dominique F C M Smeets; Malgorzata I Srebniak; Ron F Suijkerbuijk; Gita M Tan-Sindhunata; A Jeanine E M van der Ven; Shama L van Zelderen-Bhola; Lidewij Henneman; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal; Marjan M Weiss
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Biological explanations for discordant noninvasive prenatal test results: Preliminary data and lessons learned.

Authors:  Louise Wilkins-Haug; Chengsheng Zhang; Eliza Cerveira; Mallory Ryan; Adam Mil-Homens; Qihui Zhu; Honey Reddi; Charles Lee; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Utility of noninvasive genome-wide screening: a prospective cohort of obstetric patients undergoing diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Stephanie Guseh; Louise Wilkins-Haug; Anjali Kaimal; Lisa Dunn-Albanese; Sophie Adams; Sarah Carroll; Marie Discenza; Lori Dobson; Marney Brillinger; Judith Foster; Samantha Gbur; Hayley Green; Nancy Herrig; Chelsea Mandigo; Michelle Pacione; Penelope Roberts; Abigail Sassaman; Kathleen Steinberg; Courtney Studwell; Kathryn J Gray
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  When Tissue is an Issue the Liquid Biopsy is Nonissue: A Review.

Authors:  July Rodríguez; Jenny Avila; Christian Rolfo; Alejandro Ruíz-Patiño; Alessandro Russo; Luisa Ricaurte; Camila Ordóñez-Reyes; Oscar Arrieta; Zyanya Lucia Zatarain-Barrón; Gonzalo Recondo; Andrés F Cardona
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2021-03-10

Review 5.  Clinical relevance of circulating molecules in cancer: focus on gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Gloria Ravegnini; Giulia Sammarini; César Serrano; Margherita Nannini; Maria A Pantaleo; Patrizia Hrelia; Sabrina Angelini
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 8.168

6.  Clinical management of pregnancies with positive screening results for rare autosomal aneuploidies at a single center.

Authors:  Lingshan Gou; Yuan Fang; Na Wang; Man Zhang; Tianya Liu; Yi Wang; Shunan Hu; Yan Zhang; Qin Wu; Yifan Wang; Feng Suo; Maosheng Gu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Three years of clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies and copy-number variants.

Authors:  Erica Soster; Theresa Boomer; Susan Hicks; Samantha Caldwell; Brittany Dyr; Jason Chibuk; Eyad Almasri
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Genomic Diagnosis for Pediatric Disorders: Revolution and Evolution.

Authors:  Emilie Lalonde; Stefan Rentas; Fumin Lin; Matthew C Dulik; Cara M Skraban; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 9.  Potential of modern circulating cell-free DNA diagnostic tools for detection of specific tumour cells in clinical practice.

Authors:  Jernej Gašperšič; Alja Videtič Paska
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.313

10.  Strategies to minimize false positives and interpret novel microdeletions based on maternal copy-number variants in 87,000 noninvasive prenatal screens.

Authors:  Kristjan Eerik Kaseniit; Gregory J Hogan; Kevin M D'Auria; Carrie Haverty; Dale Muzzey
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.