Literature DB >> 2314775

Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: an association with poor perinatal outcome.

A Johnson1, R J Wapner, G H Davis, L G Jackson.   

Abstract

Prenatal diagnosis by first-trimester chorionic villus sampling was successful in 4319 pregnancies involving 4395 fetuses. Cytogenetic information was obtained by both rapid cytotrophoblastic preparation and monolayer mesenchymal tissue culture. Chromosomal mosaicism was present in 55 of 4319 (1.3%). The abnormal cell line involved the cytotrophoblast in 79.6% of the mosaic specimens. None of the abnormalities found in the cytotrophoblast were confirmed in the fetus when the tissue culture was normal, supporting the belief that the cells of the mesenchymal core more truly reflect the chromosomal constitution of the fetus. However, a significant increase in the perinatal loss rate in the placental mosaic group was noted when compared with the nonmosaics: 16.7 versus 2.7% (P = .0001). These findings suggest that placental mosaicism may be a cause of perinatal loss.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2314775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  13 in total

Review 1.  Confined placental mosaicism and intrauterine fetal growth.

Authors:  V S Lestou; D K Kalousek
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Spontaneous abortion and confined chromosomal mosaicism.

Authors:  D K Kalousek; I J Barrett; A B Gärtner
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Distribution of mosaicism in human placentae.

Authors:  K G Henderson; T E Shaw; I J Barrett; A H Telenius; R D Wilson; D K Kalousek
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Confined placental mosaicism.

Authors:  D K Kalousek; M Vekemans
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Detection of confined placental mosaicism in trisomy 18 conceptions using interphase cytogenetic analysis.

Authors:  K J Harrison; I J Barrett; B L Lomax; B D Kuchinka; D K Kalousek
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Cytogenetic analysis in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  S A Schonberg
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-09

7.  First trimester prenatal diagnosis: earlier is not necessarily better.

Authors:  J A Boss
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Optimization of techniques for multiple platform testing in small, precious samples such as human chorionic villus sampling.

Authors:  Margareta D Pisarska; Marzieh Akhlaghpour; Bora Lee; Gillian M Barlow; Ning Xu; Erica T Wang; Aaron J Mackey; Charles R Farber; Stephen S Rich; Jerome I Rotter; Yii-der I Chen; Mark O Goodarzi; Seth Guller; John Williams
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Uniparental disomy for chromosome 16 in humans.

Authors:  D K Kalousek; S Langlois; I Barrett; I Yam; D R Wilson; P N Howard-Peebles; M P Johnson; E Giorgiutti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Genome-wide cfDNA screening: clinical laboratory experience with the first 10,000 cases.

Authors:  Mathias Ehrich; John Tynan; Amin Mazloom; Eyad Almasri; Ron McCullough; Theresa Boomer; Daniel Grosu; Jason Chibuk
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.