Literature DB >> 28616810

Accuracy of non-contrast PMCT for determining cause of death.

Garyfalia Ampanozi1, Yannick A Thali1,2, Wolf Schweitzer1, Gary M Hatch3, Lars C Ebert1, Michael J Thali1, Thomas D Ruder4,5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was (1) to compare levels of accuracy regarding the categorization of causes of death between non-contrast post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) and the final forensic report as well as between autopsy and the final forensic report, and (2) to assess levels of confidence regarding the categorization of causes of death after non-contrast PMCT and after autopsy. This prospective study was conducted over a 5 month period during which 221 cases were admitted to our institute for forensic investigations. Whole-body PMCT and forensic autopsy were performed in every case. Of these, 101 cases were included in the final study population. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age > 18 years, (2) presence of at least one of the two principal investigators at the time of admission. One radiologist and one forensic pathologist independently read all PMCT datasets using a report template. Cause of death category and confidence levels were determined by consensus. Forensic autopsy was performed by two forensic pathologists; both unblinded to imaging results. Both post-imaging and post-autopsy cause of death categorization were compared against the final cause of death, as stated in the forensic expert report, which included findings from histology and/or toxicology. Accuracy of post-imaging cause of death categorization in reference to the final cause of death category was substantial (82%, 83/101 cases, Kappa 0.752). Accuracy of post-autopsy cause of death categorization in reference to the final cause of death category was near perfect (89%, 90/101 cases, Kappa 0.852). Post-imaging sensitivity and specificity regarding the categorization of causes of death were 82% and 97%, respectively. Post-autopsy sensitivity and specificity regarding the categorization of causes of death were 89% and 98%, respectively. There was a high consistency between the accuracy of post-imaging cause of death categorization and post-imaging levels of confidence. There was less consistency between accuracy of post-autopsy cause of death categorization and post-autopsy levels of confidence. In this study categorization of causes of death based on non-contrast enhanced PMCT alone, and on PMCT and macroscopic autopsy together, proved to be consistent with the final cause of death-category as determined based on all available information including PMCT, autopsy, and (if available) histology and/or toxicology in more than 82% and 89% of all cases, respectively. There was higher consistency between levels of confidence and accuracy of causes of death categorization was higher post-imaging than post-autopsy. These results underline the fact that the diagnostic potential of PMCT goes beyond the assessment of trauma cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cause of death; Forensic radiology; PMCT; Post-mortem computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28616810     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-017-9878-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  30 in total

1.  Interobserver agreement of the injury diagnoses obtained by postmortem computed tomography of traffic fatality victims and a comparison with autopsy results.

Authors:  Peter Mygind Leth; Henrik Struckmann; Jens Lauritsen
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Systematic analysis of the radiologic findings of aortic dissections on unenhanced postmortem computed tomography.

Authors:  Garyfalia Ampanozi; Patricia M Flach; Juergen Fornaro; Steffen G Ross; Wolf Schweitzer; Michael J Thali; Thomas D Ruder
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Postmortem computed tomography lung findings in fatal of hypothermia.

Authors:  Hideki Hyodoh; Satoshi Watanabe; Ryuichi Katada; Kazusa Hyodoh; Hiroshi Matsumoto
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Virtual autopsy.

Authors:  Peter Mygind Leth
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Contrast-enhanced postmortem computed tomography in clinical pathology: enhanced value of 20 clinical autopsies.

Authors:  Saskia E Westphal; Jonas C Apitzsch; Tobias Penzkofer; Christiane K Kuhl; Andreas H Mahnken; Ruth Knüchel
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Protocol for writing cause-of-death statements for deaths due to natural causes.

Authors:  R Hanzlick
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-01-08

7.  Post-mortem whole body computed tomography of opioid (heroin and methadone) fatalities: frequent findings and comparison to autopsy.

Authors:  Sebastian Winklhofer; Eddie Surer; Garyfalia Ampanozi; Thomas Ruder; Paul Stolzmann; Marina Elliott; Andrea Oestreich; Thomas Kraemer; Michael Thali; Hatem Alkadhi; Wolf Schweitzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy?

Authors:  Annick C Weustink; M G Myriam Hunink; Cornelis F van Dijke; Nomdo S Renken; Gabriel P Krestin; J Wolter Oosterhuis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study.

Authors:  Ian S D Roberts; Rachel E Benamore; Emyr W Benbow; Stephen H Lee; Jonathan N Harris; Alan Jackson; Susan Mallett; Tufail Patankar; Charles Peebles; Carl Roobottom; Zoe C Traill
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy compared to conventional autopsy of suspected natural deaths in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Britt M Blokker; Ivo M Wagensveld; Annick C Weustink; J Wolter Oosterhuis; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  Synergistic Effects of Forensic Medicine and Traumatology: Comparison of Clinical Diagnosis Autopsy Findings in Trauma-Related Deaths.

Authors:  Uwe Schmidt; Delovan Oramary; Konrad Kamin; Claas T Buschmann; Christian Kleber
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Postmortem imaging findings and cause of death determination compared with autopsy: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Garyfalia Ampanozi; Delaja Halbheer; Lars C Ebert; Michael J Thali; Ulrike Held
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Fatal gunshot injuries in the common buzzard Buteo buteo L. 1758 - imaging and ballistic findings.

Authors:  Filip Pankowski; Grzegorz Bogiel; Sławomir Paśko; Filip Rzepiński; Joanna Misiewicz; Alfred Staszak; Joanna Bonecka; Małgorzata Dzierzęcka; Bartłomiej J Bartyzel
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Can virtual autopsy with postmortem CT improve clinical diagnosis of cause of death? A retrospective observational cohort study in a Dutch tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Lianne J P Sonnemans; Bela Kubat; Mathias Prokop; Willemijn M Klein
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.