Literature DB >> 28616711

Integrating NOE and RDC using sum-of-squares relaxation for protein structure determination.

Y Khoo1,2, A Singer3, D Cowburn4.   

Abstract

We revisit the problem of protein structure determination from geometrical restraints from NMR, using convex optimization. It is well-known that the NP-hard distance geometry problem of determining atomic positions from pairwise distance restraints can be relaxed into a convex semidefinite program (SDP). However, often the NOE distance restraints are too imprecise and sparse for accurate structure determination. Residual dipolar coupling (RDC) measurements provide additional geometric information on the angles between atom-pair directions and axes of the principal-axis-frame. The optimization problem involving RDC is highly non-convex and requires a good initialization even within the simulated annealing framework. In this paper, we model the protein backbone as an articulated structure composed of rigid units. Determining the rotation of each rigid unit gives the full protein structure. We propose solving the non-convex optimization problems using the sum-of-squares (SOS) hierarchy, a hierarchy of convex relaxations with increasing complexity and approximation power. Unlike classical global optimization approaches, SOS optimization returns a certificate of optimality if the global optimum is found. Based on the SOS method, we proposed two algorithms-RDC-SOS and RDC-NOE-SOS, that have polynomial time complexity in the number of amino-acid residues and run efficiently on a standard desktop. In many instances, the proposed methods exactly recover the solution to the original non-convex optimization problem. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time SOS relaxation is introduced to solve non-convex optimization problems in structural biology. We further introduce a statistical tool, the Cramér-Rao bound (CRB), to provide an information theoretic bound on the highest resolution one can hope to achieve when determining protein structure from noisy measurements using any unbiased estimator. Our simulation results show that when the RDC measurements are corrupted by Gaussian noise of realistic variance, both SOS based algorithms attain the CRB. We successfully apply our method in a divide-and-conquer fashion to determine the structure of ubiquitin from experimental NOE and RDC measurements obtained in two alignment media, achieving more accurate and faster reconstructions compared to the current state of the art.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convex optimization; Cramér–Rao lower-bound; Nuclear Overhauser effect; Protein structure determination; Residual dipolar coupling; Semidefinite programming; Sum-of-squares optimization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28616711     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-017-0108-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  40 in total

1.  The penultimate rotamer library.

Authors:  S C Lovell; J M Word; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-15

2.  The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package.

Authors:  Charles D Schwieters; John J Kuszewski; Nico Tjandra; G Marius Clore
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA.

Authors:  Peter Güntert
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2004

4.  A new strategy for structure determination of large proteins in solution without deuteration.

Authors:  Yingqi Xu; Yu Zheng; Jing-Song Fan; Daiwen Yang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Determining protein structures from NOESY distance constraints by semidefinite programming.

Authors:  Babak Alipanahi; Nathan Krislock; Ali Ghodsi; Henry Wolkowicz; Logan Donaldson; Ming Li
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  A two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser enhancement (2D NOE) experiment for the elucidation of complete proton-proton cross-relaxation networks in biological macromolecules.

Authors:  A Kumar; R R Ernst; K Wüthrich
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1980-07-16       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA.

Authors:  P Güntert; C Mumenthaler; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Dynafold: a dynamic programming approach to protein backbone structure determination from minimal sets of Residual Dipolar Couplings.

Authors:  Rishi Mukhopadhyay; Stephanie Irausquin; Christopher Schmidt; Homayoun Valafar
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 1.122

9.  An algorithm to enumerate all possible protein conformations verifying a set of distance constraints.

Authors:  Andrea Cassioli; Benjamin Bardiaux; Guillaume Bouvier; Antonio Mucherino; Rafael Alves; Leo Liberti; Michael Nilges; Carlile Lavor; Thérèse E Malliavin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Sparse labeling of proteins: structural characterization from long range constraints.

Authors:  James H Prestegard; David A Agard; Kelley W Moremen; Laura A Lavery; Laura C Morris; Kari Pederson
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.