Literature DB >> 28615792

A CMOS-based high resolution fluoroscope (HRF) detector prototype with 49.5 μm pixels for use in endovascular image guided interventions (EIGI).

M Russ1, A Shankar1, S V Setlur Nagesh1, C N Ionita1, D R Bednarek1, S Rudin1.   

Abstract

X-ray detectors to meet the high-resolution requirements for endovascular image-guided interventions (EIGIs) are being developed and evaluated. A new 49.5-micron pixel prototype detector is being investigated and compared to the current suite of high-resolution fluoroscopic (HRF) detectors. This detector featuring a 300-micron thick CsI(Tl) scintillator, and low electronic noise CMOS readout is designated the HRF-CMOS50. To compare the abilities of this detector with other existing high resolution detectors, a standard performance metric analysis was applied, including the determination of the modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectra (NPS), noise equivalent quanta (NEQ), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) for a range of energies and exposure levels. The advantage of the smaller pixel size and reduced blurring due to the thin phosphor was exemplified when the MTF of the HRF-CMOS50 was compared to the other high resolution detectors, which utilize larger pixels, other optical designs or thicker scintillators. However, the thinner scintillator has the disadvantage of a lower quantum detective efficiency (QDE) for higher diagnostic x-ray energies. The performance of the detector as part of an imaging chain was examined by employing the generalized metrics GMTF, GNEQ, and GDQE, taking standard focal spot size and clinical imaging parameters into consideration. As expected, the disparaging effects of focal spot unsharpness, exacerbated by increasing magnification, degraded the higher-frequency performance of the HRF-CMOS50, while increasing scatter fraction diminished low-frequency performance. Nevertheless, the HRF-CMOS50 brings improved resolution capabilities for EIGIs, but would require increased sensitivity and dynamic range for future clinical application.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMOS; DQE; GDQE; GMTF; Generalized Metrics; High-Resolution Fluoroscope (HRF); MTF

Year:  2017        PMID: 28615792      PMCID: PMC5467738          DOI: 10.1117/12.2253745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  5 in total

1.  Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system.

Authors:  Iacovos S Kyprianou; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A practical exposure-equivalent metric for instrumentation noise in x-ray imaging systems.

Authors:  G K Yadava; A T Kuhls-Gilcrist; S Rudin; V K Patel; K R Hoffmann; D R Bednarek
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.

Authors:  E Samei; M J Flynn; D A Reimann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Experimental and theoretical performance analysis for a CMOS-based high resolution image detector.

Authors:  Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.