Literature DB >> 28611486

Quantitative measurements of dielectrophoresis in a nanoscale electrode array with an atomic force microscopy.

James Froberg1, Vidura Jayasooriya2, Seungyong You1, Dharmakeerthi Nawarathna2, Yongki Choi1.   

Abstract

Nanoelectronic devices integrated with dielectrophoresis (DEP) have been promoted as promising platforms for trapping, separating, and concentrating target biomarkers and cancer cells from a complex medium. Here, we visualized DEP and DEP gradients in conventional nanoelectronic devices by using multi-pass atomic force microcopy techniques. Our measurements directly demonstrated a short range DEP only at sharp step edges of electrodes, frequency dependent DEP polarity, and separation distance dependent DEP strength. Additionally, non-uniform DEP along the edges of the electrodes due to a large variation in electric field strength was observed. The strength and apparent working distance of DEP were measured to be an order of a few nN and 80 nm within the limited scale of particles and other parameters such as an ionic strength of the medium. This method provides a powerful tool to quantify the strength and polarity of DEP and allows optimizing and calibrating the device's operating parameters including the driving field strength for the effective control and manipulation of target biomolecules.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28611486      PMCID: PMC5435496          DOI: 10.1063/1.4983785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Phys Lett        ISSN: 0003-6951            Impact factor:   3.791


  12 in total

1.  Separation of submicron bioparticles by dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  H Morgan; M P Hughes; N G Green
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Electrodeless dielectrophoresis of single- and double-stranded DNA.

Authors:  Chia-Fu Chou; Jonas O Tegenfeldt; Olgica Bakajin; Shirley S Chan; Edward C Cox; Nicholas Darnton; Thomas Duke; Robert H Austin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Basic theory of dielectrophoresis and electrorotation.

Authors:  Thomas B Jones
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Electrical forces for microscale cell manipulation.

Authors:  Joel Voldman
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  Direct measurements of the frequency-dependent dielectrophoresis force.

Authors:  Ming-Tzo Wei; Joseph Junio; H Daniel Ou-Yang
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 6.  Advances in single-molecule fluorescence methods for molecular biology.

Authors:  Chirlmin Joo; Hamza Balci; Yuji Ishitsuka; Chittanon Buranachai; Taekjip Ha
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Label-free attomolar detection of proteins using integrated nanoelectronic and electrokinetic devices.

Authors:  Jian-Ru Gong
Journal:  Small       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 13.281

8.  Dielectrophoretic label-free immunoassay for rare-analyte quantification in biological samples.

Authors:  Logeeshan Velmanickam; Darrin Laudenbach; Dharmakeerthi Nawarathna
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.529

9.  Separation of human breast cancer cells from blood by differential dielectric affinity.

Authors:  F F Becker; X B Wang; Y Huang; R Pethig; J Vykoukal; P R Gascoyne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Label-free biomarker detection from whole blood.

Authors:  Eric Stern; Aleksandar Vacic; Nitin K Rajan; Jason M Criscione; Jason Park; Bojan R Ilic; David J Mooney; Mark A Reed; Tarek M Fahmy
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  1 in total

1.  Selective Manipulation of Biomolecules with Insulator-Based Dielectrophoretic Tweezers.

Authors:  Myungkeun Oh; Vidura Jayasooriya; Sung Oh Woo; Dharmakeerthi Nawarathna; Yongki Choi
Journal:  ACS Appl Nano Mater       Date:  2020-01-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.