Literature DB >> 28607883

Evaluation of Requirements for Staging the Procedure of Reconstruction of Middle Ear After Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy.

C Ravishankar1, R K Datta1.   

Abstract

Cholesteatoma is a progressive destructive ear disease which can affect any age group. It has been found to be more severe in children and young adults. It erodes the surrounding bone of middle ear, mastoid and ossicles. It causes partial to total deafness, unpleasant smelling discharge, pain, tinnitus, vertigo and facial paralysis. It can even cause meningitis, brain abscess and death. The post-operative outcome of hearing, and the state of the reconstructed middle-ear cavity after concurrent and staged reconstruction of middle ear after canal wall down mastoidectomy was studied in 30 ears with middle-ear cholesteatoma. The reconstructed middle ear was re-aerated in 60.5 % of the cases, which was significantly higher than for the epitympanum (39.5 %). Tympanoplasty was successful in terms of hearing results in 68.9 % of all subjects and in 75.4 % of the ears having a re-aerated tympanic cavity, which was significantly better than the 38.5 % for ears in which the tympanic cavity was not re-aerated. The findings of recurrent cholesteatoma, tympanic atelectasis, and tympanic effusion were observed with significantly (p < 0.03) high incidence in ears with no re-aerated space in their reconstructed mastoid cavities. It was revealed that the post-operative outcome of this surgical technique was significantly related to the state of re-aeration of the reconstructed middle-ear cavity but not with either concurrent or staged reconstruction. Audiological results are same for both concurrent and staged reconstruction following canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy, and hence we reccommend that concurrent reconstruction is preferred in limited disease and staged reconstruction in severe disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canal wall down mastoidectomy; Middle ear reconstruction; Staging

Year:  2016        PMID: 28607883      PMCID: PMC5446334          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-016-0990-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  7 in total

1.  Canal wall down tympanoplasty with canal reconstruction for middle-ear cholesteatoma: post-operative hearing, cholesteatoma recurrence, and status of re-aeration of reconstructed middle-ear cavity.

Authors:  Minoru Ikeda; Shinya Yoshida; Akihiro Ikui; Shuntaro Shigihara
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index.

Authors:  Robert C O'Reilly; Steven P Cass; Barry E Hirsch; Donald B Kamerer; Richard A Bernat; Sherri P Poznanovic
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Should ossicular reconstruction be staged following tympanomastoidectomy.

Authors:  Harold H Kim; Robert A Battista; Arvind Kumar; Richard J Wiet
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Cholesteatoma: what is it, how did it get there, and how do we get rid of it?

Authors:  A F Jahn
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Ossiculoplasty with presculpted banked cartilage.

Authors:  R A Chole
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Ossiculoplasty in canal wall down mastoidectomy.

Authors:  L P Berenholz; F M Rizer; J M Burkey; A G Schuring; W H Lippy
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Results of hearing tests after total middle ear reconstruction.

Authors:  Toru Sasaki; Anting Xu; Shin-ichi Ishimoto; Ken Ito; Tatsuya Yamasoba; Kimitaka Kaga
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.494

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.