Literature DB >> 16151328

Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index.

Robert C O'Reilly1, Steven P Cass, Barry E Hirsch, Donald B Kamerer, Richard A Bernat, Sherri P Poznanovic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the immediate hearing result and the long-term stability of sculpted incus interposition in ossiculoplasty and evaluate the utility of the middle ear risk index in predicting hearing outcome in these cases. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-seven surgical patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Review of 137 patients who underwent ossiculoplasty using autologous or homologous sculpted incus interposition.
INTERVENTIONS: Ossiculoplasty using autologous or homologous sculpted incus interposition.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review, using the guidelines delineated by the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium of the Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery for the evaluation of results for the treatment of conductive hearing loss.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative air bone gap was 26.8 dB, and the mean postoperative gap was 18.6 dB. Twenty-seven percent of patients were closed to within 10 dB, and 66.4% were brought to within 20 dB of the postoperative bone conduction line. Average time to the last postoperative audiometric testing was 15.8 months, with a range of 2 to 62 months. A mean air bone gap change of -0.2 dB was noted. Four patients had more than a 10 dB deterioration in conductive hearing loss. There were no cases of graft extrusion. Each ear operated upon in our series was fully scored using the middle ear risk index, and an index total was calculated. No statistical associations could be demonstrated in any group between the postoperative air bone gap and the middle ear risk index subcategories or total.
CONCLUSIONS: Sculpted autologous or homologous incus interposition provides hearing success comparable with current allograft prosthesis studies, has a very low extrusion rate, and remains stable over time. We were not able to demonstrate an association between the middle ear risk index and hearing results in this subset of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16151328     DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000185054.92265.b7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  20 in total

1.  Ossicular reconstruction: hydroxyapatite bone cement versus incus remodelling: how to manage incudostapedial discontinuity.

Authors:  Thomas Somers; Vincent Van Rompaey; Gerd Claes; Liesbeth Salembier; Joost van Dinther; Zarowski Andrzej; Erwin Offeciers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Short-term results using Kurz titanium ossicular implants.

Authors:  Flemming S Vassbotn; Per Møller; Juha Silvola
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparison of glass ionomer cement and incus interposition in reconstruction of incus long process defects.

Authors:  Huseyin Dere; Fatih Ozdogan; K Murat Ozcan; Adin Selcuk; Ibrahim Ozcan; Gokhan Gokturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The use of bone cement for ossicular chain defects.

Authors:  M Tayyar Kalcioglu; Mehmet Tan; Jelle Fleerakkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Evaluation on shear bond strength of different glass ionomer and hydroxy apatite cements used in ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  M Tayyar Kalcıoğlu; İsmail Hakkı Uzun; Muhammet Yalçın; Meral Arslan Malkoç; Ayşe Tuba Öğreten; Fatih Mehmet Hanege
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.021

6.  Comparison of incus interpositioning technique versus glass ionomer cement application in type 2 tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Haşmet Yazıcı; Hakkı Uzunkulaoğlu; Hatice Karadas Emir; Zeynep Kızılkaya; Sedat Doğan; Erdal Samim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Evaluation of Requirements for Staging the Procedure of Reconstruction of Middle Ear After Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy.

Authors:  C Ravishankar; R K Datta
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-05-18

Review 8.  Ossiculoplasty: revisited.

Authors:  R S Mudhol; A I Naragund; V S Shruthi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-01-13

9.  Modified Radical Mastoidectomy with Type III Tympanoplasty: Revisited.

Authors:  Rashmi Goyal; Ashish Mourya; Sadat Qureshi; Sandeep Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-08-22

10.  [Variable length titanium prostheses for type III tympanoplasty. Intraoperative length adjustment and fixation of the cartilage overlay].

Authors:  H-P Zenner; R Zimmermann; U Steinhardt; M M Maassen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.