Literature DB >> 33834130

Kyphoplasty versus percutaneous posterior instrumentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures with posterior wall injury: a propensity score matched cohort study.

Manuel Moser1,2, Julien Jost1,2, Edin Nevzati1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) that present with posterior wall cortical injury pose a higher risk for instability. Surgical management includes standard cement augmentation techniques like balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) or percutaneous posterior instrumentation with pedicle screws (PS) or both. Neither treatment has yet demonstrated superiority, and posterior cement leakage is of special concern in these fractures.
METHODS: At a single tertiary care center, 25 patients with 32 OVFs with posterior wall injury treated with percutaneous instrumentation and cement augmentation (PS group) were retrospectively included and matched (1:1) using propensity scores to 25 patients with 29 OVFs with posterior wall injury treated with standalone BKP (BKP group) from 2010 to 2018. Our primary study aim identified 30-day morbidity rates using a 4-point grading system by comparing BKP with and without percutaneous instrumentation with PS for the treatment of OVFs with posterior wall injury. Our secondary aims evaluated cement leakage, radiographic results, surgical time, length of stay (LOS), pain relief, and subsequent fractures.
RESULTS: Overall 30-day morbidity was 34% and did not differ between groups (24% BKP vs. 44% PS groups, P=0.136). Most complications were mild (82.4%), requiring no interventions beyond drug treatment. In the PS group, a trend towards more mild complications was observed (16% vs. 40%, P=0.059). Moderate and severe complications affected 17.6% of all morbidity cases and were comparable between groups. Asymptomatic cement leakage into the spinal canal was noted in 2 (8%) BKP patients and symptomatic pulmonary cement embolism in 1 (4.8%) PS patient. Compared with baseline, all radiographic parameters significantly improved in both groups. In the BKP group, mean surgical times (52±32.9 vs. 164.9±48.4 minutes, P<0.001) and LOS (4.3±2.5 vs. 7±2.9 days, P<0.001) were significantly shorter, and use of opioids at discharge was significantly lower (52% vs. 84%, P=0.015). At 3-month follow-up, no differences between groups were seen in back pain, use of opioids, and occurrence of subsequent OVFs. Follow-up averaged 8.4 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Standalone BKP may be a viable option for the treatment of OVFs even in the presence of posterior wall cortical injury. 2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Osteoporosis; cement augmentation; kyphoplasty; posterior wall injury; vertebral fracture

Year:  2021        PMID: 33834130      PMCID: PMC8024763          DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  44 in total

Review 1.  Risk Factors for Cement Leakage After Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Published Evidence.

Authors:  Yi Zhan; Jianzhong Jiang; Haifen Liao; Haitao Tan; Keqin Yang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  A new classification of complications in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Federico Alfonso Landriel Ibañez; Santiago Hem; Pablo Ajler; Eduardo Vecchi; Carlos Ciraolo; Matteo Baccanelli; Ruben Tramontano; Fernando Knezevich; Antonio Carrizo
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study.

Authors:  J R Center; T V Nguyen; D Schneider; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Risk of cement leakage and pulmonary embolism by bone cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation of the thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  Insa Janssen; Yu-Mi Ryang; Jens Gempt; Stefanie Bette; Julia Gerhardt; Jan S Kirschke; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 5.  Instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine: biomechanical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Karthikeyan E Ponnusamy; Sravisht Iyer; Gaurav Gupta; A Jay Khanna
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of the pedicle screw: the cement distribution in the vertebral body.

Authors:  Ming-Hsien Hu; Hung Ta H Wu; Ming-Chau Chang; Wing-Kuang Yu; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines.

Authors:  S Becker; A Chavanne; R Spitaler; K Kropik; N Aigner; M Ogon; H Redl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Douglas Wardlaw; Steven R Cummings; Jan Van Meirhaeghe; Leonard Bastian; John B Tillman; Jonas Ranstam; Richard Eastell; Peter Shabe; Karen Talmadge; Steven Boonen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A randomized trial of balloon kyphoplasty and nonsurgical management for treating acute vertebral compression fractures: vertebral body kyphosis correction and surgical parameters.

Authors:  Jan Van Meirhaeghe; Leonard Bastian; Steven Boonen; Jonas Ranstam; John B Tillman; Douglas Wardlaw
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Prospective and Multicenter Evaluation of Outcomes for Quality of Life and Activities of Daily Living for Balloon Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures: The EVOLVE Trial.

Authors:  Douglas P Beall; M R Chambers; Sam Thomas; John Amburgy; James R Webb; Bradly S Goodman; Devin K Datta; Richard W Easton; Douglas Linville; Sanjay Talati; John B Tillman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.