Literature DB >> 28604065

Using Radar Plots to Demonstrate the Accuracy and Precision of 6 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Scott Pardo1, Nancy Dunne1, David A Simmons1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previously, fingertip capillary blood glucose measurements from the CONTOUR®NEXT (CN) blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) and 5 other BGMSs were evaluated in comparison with measurements from a reference YSI glucose analyzer. Here, we use Radar Plots to graphically represent the accuracy and precision results from the previous study, including whether they met ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria.
METHOD: A Radar Plot, a new method for capturing a distinct, single visualization of BGMS analytical performance, is a collection of concentric circles, each representing a particular magnitude of error. The center of the plot represents zero error (BGMS result is equivalent to reference result); as points are more distant from the center, the error increases, expressed in units of mg/dL or percentage for YSI values <100 and ≥100 mg/dL, respectively. The position of the data point above or below the horizontal line bisecting the plot indicates whether the BGMS measurement error was positive (BGMS result > YSI result) or negative (BGMS result < YSI result). Points within the "15-15 Zone," representing ±15 mg/dL or ±15% error, satisfy ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria.
RESULTS: The percentage of results within the 15-15 Zone ranged from 83.6% to 99.8% for the 6 BGMSs (99.6% for CN).
CONCLUSIONS: Radar Plots provide a different method for visually comparing the analytical performance of multiple BGMSs. The tight clustering of data points at the center of the CN Radar Plot illustrates the analytical performance of CN compared with 5 other BGMSs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radar Plots; accuracy; blood glucose monitoring; diabetes management; self-monitoring of blood glucose

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28604065      PMCID: PMC5950999          DOI: 10.1177/1932296817713026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  9 in total

1.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose.

Authors:  J L Parkes; S L Slatin; S Pardo; B H Ginsberg
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Comparison of the numerical and clinical accuracy of four continuous glucose monitors.

Authors:  Boris Kovatchev; Stacey Anderson; Lutz Heinemann; William Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies: is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data?

Authors:  D Stöckl; K Dewitte; L M Thienpont
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.

Authors:  Leslie J Klaff; Ronald Brazg; Kristen Hughes; Ann M Tideman; Holly C Schachner; Patricia Stenger; Scott Pardo; Nancy Dunne; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  The surveillance error grid.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Courtney Lias; Robert Vigersky; William Clarke; Joan Lee Parkes; David B Sacks; M Sue Kirkman; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-13

6.  Strengths and Limitations of New Approaches for Graphical Presentation of Blood Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy Data.

Authors:  Stefan Pleus; Frank Flacke; Jochen Sieber; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-26

7.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  How Should Blood Glucose Meter System Analytical Performance Be Assessed?

Authors:  David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-31
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Accuracy Beyond ISO: Introducing a New Method for Distinguishing Differences Between Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Meeting ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Requirements.

Authors:  Scott Pardo; Rimma M Shaginian; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-15

2.  User Performance Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Applying ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Criteria and Calculation of Insulin Dosing Errors.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Nina Jendrike; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Christina Liebing; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.945

3.  Prevalence and perinatal outcomes of non-communicable diseases in pregnancy in a regional hospital in Haiti: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Isabelle Malhamé; Rodney Destiné; Widmise Jacquecilien; Bidjinie H Coriolan; Wacquinn St-Loth; Marie Claudy Excellent; Benjaminel Scaide; Remy Wong; Sarah Meltzer; Eddy Jean-Baptiste; Louise Pilote; Julia E von Oettingen; Kerling Israel
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 4.413

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.