Literature DB >> 28601990

Application of a novel 3D drill template for cervical pedicle screw tunnel design: a cadaveric study.

Zhengxi Yu1, Guodong Zhang2, Xuanhuang Chen1, Xu Chen1, Changfu Wu1, Yijun Lin1, Wenhua Huang3, Haibin Lin4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and validate the efficacy and accuracy of a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) reconstructive rapid prototyping drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement.
METHODS: CT thin-layer scans were obtained from 12 adult cadaveric cervical specimens and reconstructed. The ideal screw channels were chosen by analyzing the cross sections of the reconstructed 3D images. The navigation templates were designed and printed based on the optimal screw channels. The pedicle screws were placed on the cadaver specimens under template guidance, and the cadaver specimens were scanned and reconstructed. The pre- and post-operative models were compared. Entry point and exit point data of these two models were collected and compared using the Chi-square test.
RESULTS: A total of 164 cervical pedicle screws were placed; among them, six punctured the cortical bone of the vertebral pedicle reaching an accuracy of 96.3%. Among the outside screws, all of the deviation distances were <2 mm. The Chi-square test results showed that when a deviation of 1.2 mm was used as a standard for the entry point, there was no difference between the two groups (χ 2 = 1.346, p = 0.248); when a deviation of 2.2 mm was used as a standard for the exit point, there was no difference between the two groups (χ 2 = 3.250, p = 0.061).
CONCLUSION: The 3D CT reconstructive rapid prototyping drill template combined with the screw tunnel design based on 3D cutting technique can help facilitate accurate cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D prototype; Cervical; Computer-aided; Digital design; Pedicle screw

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28601990     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5118-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Tokumi Kanemura; Go Yoshida; Zenya Ito; Akio Muramoto; Shuichiro Ohno
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-11

2.  Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement: a comparison of the "open" lamino-foraminotomy and computer-assisted techniques.

Authors:  Gabriel Y F Lee; Eric M Massicotte; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2007-02

Review 3.  The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems.

Authors:  Alexander Mason; Renee Paulsen; Jason M Babuska; Sharad Rajpal; Sigita Burneikiene; E Lee Nelson; Alan T Villavicencio
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-12-20

4.  Accuracy of image-guided pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation with automated referencing. Part II: thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  Kai-Michael Scheufler; Joerg Franke; Anke Eckardt; Hildegard Dohmen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Efficacy and accuracy of a novel rapid prototyping drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Sheng Lu; Yong Q Xu; Guo P Chen; Yuan Z Zhang; Di Lu; Yu B Chen; Ji H Shi; Xing M Xu
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2011-08-12

6.  A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tao Ma; Yong-Qing Xu; Yu-Bin Cheng; Mu-Yao Jiang; Xing-Ming Xu; Le Xie; Sheng Lu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  A multi-level rapid prototyping drill guide template reduces the perforation risk of pedicle screw placement in the lumbar and sacral spine.

Authors:  Matjaz Merc; Igor Drstvensek; Matjaz Vogrin; Tomaz Brajlih; Gregor Recnik
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  A multicenter study on accuracy and complications of freehand placement of cervical pedicle screws under lateral fluoroscopy in different pathological conditions: CT-based evaluation of more than 1,000 screws.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hojo; Manabu Ito; Kota Suda; Itaru Oda; Hisashi Yoshimoto; Kuniyoshi Abumi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A New Navigational Tool for Pedicle Screw Placement in Patients With Severe Scoliosis: A Pilot Study to Prove Feasibility, Accuracy, and Identify Operative Challenges.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Patrick Strube; Riccardo Cecchinato; Claudio Lamartina; Eike K Hoff
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.876

10.  Accuracy and complications associated with the freehand C-1 lateral mass screw fixation technique: a radiographic and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Yong Hu; Christopher K Kepler; Todd J Albert; Zhen-Shan Yuan; Wei-Hu Ma; Yong-Jie Gu; Rong-Ming Xu
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-02-01
View more
  11 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Does Three-dimensional Printing Plus Pedicle Guider Technology in Severe Congenital Scoliosis Facilitate Accurate and Efficient Pedicle Screw Placement?

Authors:  George H Thompson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Template guided cervical pedicle screw instrumentation.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; José Miguel Spirig; Elin Winkler; Daniel Suter; Nadja Farshad-Amacker; Jan-Sven Jarvers; Sven Kevin Tschöke; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Anna-Katharina Calek
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 3.  Clinical applications and prospects of 3D printing guide templates in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Meng Meng; Jinzuo Wang; Tianze Sun; Wentao Zhang; Jing Zhang; Liming Shu; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.889

Review 4.  Progress of the Anterior Transpedicular Screw in Lower Cervical Spine: A Review.

Authors:  Yuan-Wei Zhang; Ting Zeng; Wen-Cheng Gao; Xin Xiao; Yan Xiao; Xi Chen; Su-Li Zhang; Liang Deng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-08-21

5.  Application of 3-dimensional printing technology combined with guide plates for thoracic spinal tuberculosis.

Authors:  Yifan Wang; Shiyuan Shi; Qi Zheng; Yanghui Jin; Yingjie Dai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Biomechanical testing of three coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction techniques with a 3D printing navigation template for clavicle-coracoid drilling.

Authors:  Ji Qi; Shijie Fu; Ruiyue Ping; Kai Wu; Ziyu Feng; Yanxiao Xu; Xiaoguang Guo; Dingkun Lin; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

7.  Posterior First and Second Cervical Vertebrae Fusion by Screw Fixation Technique using the Modern Pre-fabricated Template Method on Cadaver Samples.

Authors:  M Athari; M R Golbakhsh; A Mirbolook; M Athari; A Ahmadi; K Komlakh; A Azarhomayoun; P Paydarniya
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2021-11

8.  A Comparative Study of C2 Pedicle or Pars Screw Placement with Assistance from a 3-Dimensional (3D)-Printed Navigation Template versus C-Arm Based Navigation.

Authors:  Ye Tian; Jianan Zhang; Tuanjiang Liu; Shi Tang; Hao Chen; Keyuan Ding; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-26

9.  Pedicle screw placement in spinal neurosurgery using a 3D-printed drill guide template: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chengqiang Yu; Yufu Ou; Chengxin Xie; Yu Zhang; Jianxun Wei; Xiaoping Mu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Vital Role of In-House 3D Lab to Create Unprecedented Solutions for Challenges in Spinal Surgery, Practical Guidelines and Clinical Case Series.

Authors:  Koen Willemsen; Joëll Magré; Jeroen Mol; Herke Jan Noordmans; Harrie Weinans; Edsko E G Hekman; Moyo C Kruyt
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.