Literature DB >> 33519152

Eliciting the Social Determinants of Cancer Prevention and Control in the Catchment of an Urban Cancer Center.

Katerina Jou1, Madeline R Sterling2, Rosio Ramos2, Francesse Antoine2, David M Nanus3, Erica Phillips2.   

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of this study were two-fold: 1) to engage community stakeholders in identifying the top three social determinant of health (SDOH) barriers to the early detection and treatment of cancer in their respective communities; and 2) to develop a tailored plan responsive to the potential social risks identified within the catchment of an urban academic cancer center.
Methods: Stakeholders from four neighborhoods in Brooklyn, New York with disproportionate cancer burden were recruited; the nominal group technique, a semi-quantitative research method, was used to elicit the SDOH barriers. Responses were consolidated into categories and ranked by points received.
Results: 112 stakeholders participated in four community-based meetings. The SDOH categories of economic stability, education, and community and social context were identified as the top barriers. The themes of lost wages/employment, competing priorities, and the inability to afford care embodied the responses about economic stability. The domain of education was best described by the themes of low health literacy, targeted health topics to fill gaps in knowledge, and recommendations on the best modalities for improving health knowledge. Lastly, within the category of community and social context, the themes of stigma, bias, and discrimination, eroding support systems, and cultural misconceptions were described. Conclusions: The implications of our study are three-fold. First, they highlight the strengths of the nominal group technique as a methodology for engaging community stakeholders. Second, our analysis led to identifying a smaller set of social priorities for which tailored screening and practical solutions could be implemented within our health care system. Third, the results provide insight into the actual types of interventions and resources that communities expect from the health care sector.
Copyright © 2021, Ethnicity & Disease, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Nominal Group Technique; Prevention; Screening; Social Determinants of Health

Year:  2021        PMID: 33519152      PMCID: PMC7843052          DOI: 10.18865/ed.31.1.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethn Dis        ISSN: 1049-510X            Impact factor:   1.847


  20 in total

Review 1.  American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology.

Authors:  Lowell E Schnipper; Thomas J Smith; Derek Raghavan; Douglas W Blayney; Patricia A Ganz; Therese Marie Mulvey; Dana S Wollins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Accountable Health Communities--Addressing Social Needs through Medicare and Medicaid.

Authors:  Dawn E Alley; Chisara N Asomugha; Patrick H Conway; Darshak M Sanghavi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2013 top five list in oncology.

Authors:  Lowell E Schnipper; Gary H Lyman; Douglas W Blayney; J Russell Hoverman; Derek Raghavan; Dana S Wollins; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options.

Authors:  Lowell E Schnipper; Nancy E Davidson; Dana S Wollins; Courtney Tyne; Douglas W Blayney; Diane Blum; Adam P Dicker; Patricia A Ganz; J Russell Hoverman; Robert Langdon; Gary H Lyman; Neal J Meropol; Therese Mulvey; Lee Newcomer; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Blase Polite; Derek Raghavan; Gregory Rossi; Leonard Saltz; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Peter P Yu; Clifford A Hudis; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Avoiding the Unintended Consequences of Screening for Social Determinants of Health.

Authors:  Arvin Garg; Renée Boynton-Jarrett; Paul H Dworkin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  How Should Therapeutic Decisions about Expensive Drugs Be Made in Imperfect Environments?

Authors:  Leonard M Fleck; Marion Danis
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 7.  Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening.

Authors:  Phoebe E Freer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  The lack of paid sick leave as a barrier to cancer screening and medical care-seeking: results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Ashwini Soman; Zahava Berkowitz; Mary C White
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  The association between health literacy and cancer-related attitudes, behaviors, and knowledge.

Authors:  Nancy S Morris; Terry S Field; Joann L Wagner; Sarah L Cutrona; Douglas W Roblin; Bridget Gaglio; Andrew E Williams; Paul J K Han; Mary E Costanza; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013

10.  Comparison of Community-Level and Patient-Level Social Risk Data in a Network of Community Health Centers.

Authors:  Erika K Cottrell; Michelle Hendricks; Katie Dambrun; Stuart Cowburn; Matthew Pantell; Rachel Gold; Laura M Gottlieb
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.