Literature DB >> 28598989

Leveraging genomic prediction to scan germplasm collection for crop improvement.

Leonardo de Azevedo Peixoto1, Tara C Moellers2, Jiaoping Zhang2, Aaron J Lorenz3, Leonardo L Bhering1, William D Beavis2, Asheesh K Singh2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the potential of genomic prediction (GP) for soybean resistance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, the causal agent of white mold (WM). A diverse panel of 465 soybean plant introduction accessions was phenotyped for WM resistance in replicated field and greenhouse tests. All plant accessions were previously genotyped using the SoySNP50K BeadChip. The predictive ability of six GP models were compared, and the impact of marker density and training population size on the predictive ability was investigated. Cross-prediction among environments was tested to determine the effectiveness of the prediction models. GP models had similar prediction accuracies for all experiments. Predictive ability did not improve significantly by using more than 5k SNPs, or by increasing the training population size (from 50% to 90% of the total of individuals). The GP model effectively predicted WM resistance across field and greenhouse experiments when each was used as either the training or validation population. The GP model was able to identify WM-resistant accessions in the USDA soybean germplasm collection that had previously been reported and were not included in the study panel. This study demonstrated the applicability of GP to identify useful genetic sources of WM resistance for soybean breeding. Further research will confirm the applicability of the proposed approach to other complex disease resistance traits and in other crops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28598989      PMCID: PMC5466325          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  35 in total

1.  Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods.

Authors:  Gustavo De los Campos; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel; José Crossa
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Optimal properties of the conditional mean as a selection criterion.

Authors:  R L Fernando; D Gianola
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.

Authors:  M Pszczola; T Strabel; H A Mulder; M P L Calus
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Association mapping and genomic prediction for resistance to sudden death syndrome in early maturing soybean germplasm.

Authors:  Yong Bao; James E Kurle; Grace Anderson; Nevin D Young
Journal:  Mol Breed       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 2.589

7.  Genomic selection and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa): effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines.

Authors:  Jennifer Spindel; Hasina Begum; Deniz Akdemir; Parminder Virk; Bertrand Collard; Edilberto Redoña; Gary Atlin; Jean-Luc Jannink; Susan R McCouch
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection.

Authors:  Julio Isidro; Jean-Luc Jannink; Deniz Akdemir; Jesse Poland; Nicolas Heslot; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Genome-wide association study, genomic prediction and marker-assisted selection for seed weight in soybean (Glycine max).

Authors:  Jiaoping Zhang; Qijian Song; Perry B Cregan; Guo-Liang Jiang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Genotyping by sequencing for genomic prediction in a soybean breeding population.

Authors:  Diego Jarquín; Kyle Kocak; Luis Posadas; Katie Hyma; Joseph Jedlicka; George Graef; Aaron Lorenz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  7 in total

1.  The utility of genomic prediction models in evolutionary genetics.

Authors:  Suzanne E McGaugh; Aaron J Lorenz; Lex E Flagel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  High-Throughput Genome-Wide Genotyping To Optimize the Use of Natural Genetic Resources in the Grassland Species Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.).

Authors:  Thomas Keep; Jean-Paul Sampoux; José Luis Blanco-Pastor; Klaus J Dehmer; Matthew J Hegarty; Thomas Ledauphin; Isabelle Litrico; Hilde Muylle; Isabel Roldán-Ruiz; Anna M Roschanski; Tom Ruttink; Fabien Surault; Evelin Willner; Philippe Barre
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 3.  Genomic Selection in Sugarcane: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Channappa Mahadevaiah; Chinnaswamy Appunu; Karen Aitken; Giriyapura Shivalingamurthy Suresha; Palanisamy Vignesh; Huskur Kumaraswamy Mahadeva Swamy; Ramanathan Valarmathi; Govind Hemaprabha; Ganesh Alagarasan; Bakshi Ram
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Genome-wide association mapping and genomic prediction for adult stage sclerotinia stem rot resistance in Brassica napus (L) under field environments.

Authors:  Jayanta Roy; T M Shaikh; Luis Del Río Mendoza; Shakil Hosain; Venkat Chapara; Mukhlesur Rahman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize.

Authors:  Avjinder S Kaler; Larry C Purcell; Timothy Beissinger; Jason D Gillman
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 6.  Sunflower Hybrid Breeding: From Markers to Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Aleksandra Dimitrijevic; Renate Horn
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Increasing selection gain and accuracy of harvest prediction models in Jatropha through genome-wide selection.

Authors:  Adriano Dos Santos; Erina Vitório Rodrigues; Bruno Galvêas Laviola; Larissa Pereira Ribeiro Teodoro; Paulo Eduardo Teodoro; Leonardo Lopes Bhering
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.