Literature DB >> 28595120

Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.

Jinsheng Fang1, Lijun Bao2, Xu Li3, Peter C M van Zijl3, Zhong Chen1.   

Abstract

Background field removal is an important MR phase preprocessing step for quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). It separates the local field induced by tissue magnetic susceptibility sources from the background field generated by sources outside a region of interest, e.g. brain, such as air-tissue interface. In the vicinity of air-tissue boundary, e.g. skull and paranasal sinuses, where large susceptibility variations exist, present background field removal methods are usually insufficient and these regions often need to be excluded by brain mask erosion at the expense of losing information of local field and thus susceptibility measures in these regions. In this paper, we propose an extension to the variable-kernel sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data (V-SHARP) background field removal method using a region adaptive kernel (R-SHARP), in which a scalable spherical Gaussian kernel (SGK) is employed with its kernel radius and weights adjustable according to an energy "functional" reflecting the magnitude of field variation. Such an energy functional is defined in terms of a contour and two fitting functions incorporating regularization terms, from which a curve evolution model in level set formation is derived for energy minimization. We utilize it to detect regions of with a large field gradient caused by strong susceptibility variation. In such regions, the SGK will have a small radius and high weight at the sphere center in a manner adaptive to the voxel energy of the field perturbation. Using the proposed method, the background field generated from external sources can be effectively removed to get a more accurate estimation of the local field and thus of the QSM dipole inversion to map local tissue susceptibility sources. Numerical simulation, phantom and in vivo human brain data demonstrate improved performance of R-SHARP compared to V-SHARP and RESHARP (regularization enabled SHARP) methods, even when the whole paranasal sinus regions are preserved in the brain mask. Shadow artifacts due to strong susceptibility variations in the derived QSM maps could also be largely eliminated using the R-SHARP method, leading to more accurate QSM reconstruction.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive spherical Gaussian kernel; Background field removal; Fitting energy functional; Quantitative susceptibility mapping; Strong susceptibility variation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28595120      PMCID: PMC5846686          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  35 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Cynthia Wisnieff; Min Lou; Weiwei Chen; Pascal Spincemaille; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Suggests Altered Brain Iron in Premanifest Huntington Disease.

Authors:  J M G van Bergen; J Hua; P G Unschuld; I A L Lim; C K Jones; R L Margolis; C A Ross; P C M van Zijl; X Li
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Wei Li; Arnaud Guidon; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  High-field (9.4 T) MRI of brain dysmyelination by quantitative mapping of magnetic susceptibility.

Authors:  Chunlei Liu; Wei Li; G Allan Johnson; Bing Wu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions.

Authors:  E Mark Haacke; Saifeng Liu; Sagar Buch; Weili Zheng; Dongmei Wu; Yongquan Ye
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using Structural Feature Based Collaborative Reconstruction (SFCR) in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Lijun Bao; Xu Li; Congbo Cai; Zhong Chen; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF).

Authors:  Tian Liu; Ildar Khalidov; Ludovic de Rochefort; Pascal Spincemaille; Jing Liu; A John Tsiouris; Yi Wang
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  A comprehensive numerical analysis of background phase correction with V-SHARP.

Authors:  Pinar Senay Özbay; Andreas Deistung; Xiang Feng; Daniel Nanz; Jürgen Rainer Reichenbach; Ferdinand Schweser
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Multistage Background Field Removal (MUBAFIRE)-Compensating for B0 Distortions at Ultra-High Field.

Authors:  Johannes Lindemeyer; Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens; N Jon Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Background field removal for susceptibility mapping of human brain with large susceptibility variations.

Authors:  Jinsheng Fang; Lijun Bao; Xu Li; Peter C M van Zijl; Zhong Chen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  The Diagnostic Ability of rs-DWI to Detect Subtle Acute Infarction Lesion in the Different Regions of the Brain and the Comparison between Different b-Values.

Authors:  Tanoj Bahadur Singh; Liwu Zhang; Xiaoting Huo; Guoping Liu; Hongyan Ni; Shun Zhang; Wenzhen Zhu; Jianzhong Yin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.