Literature DB >> 28594765

Patterns of Specialty-Based Referral and Perioperative Outcomes for Women With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Hysterectomy.

Jason D Wright1, Ling Chen, Lisa Gabor, William M Burke, Ana I Tergas, June Y Hou, Cande V Ananth, Alfred I Neugut, Dawn L Hershman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine patterns of referral to gynecologic oncologists and perioperative outcomes based on surgeon specialty for women with endometrial cancer and hyperplasia.
METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to perform a retrospective cohort study of women with endometrial cancer and hyperplasia who underwent hysterectomy from 2014 to 2015. Patients were stratified based on treatment by a gynecologic oncologist or other health care provider. Patterns of referral to a gynecologic oncologist was the primary outcome, and mode of hysterectomy and complications were secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 6,510 women were identified. Gynecologic oncologists performed 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.1-91.7) of the hysterectomies for endometrial cancer, 66.8% (95% CI 63.1-70.4) for complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia, and 49.3% (95% CI 44.7-53.8) for endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Older women and those with a higher American Society of Anesthesiology score were more likely to be treated by an oncologist. Minimally invasive hysterectomy was performed in 73.6% (95% CI 72.1-75.1) of women with endometrial cancer operated on by gynecologic oncologists compared with 73.8% (95% CI 68.8-78.2) of those treated by other physicians (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-1.23); lymphadenectomy was performed in 56.3% of women treated by gynecologic oncologists compared with 34.8% of those treated by other specialists (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.99-2.94). Severe complications were uncommon and there was no difference in complication rates based on specialty, 2.6% (95% CI 2.2-3.1) compared with 2.0% (95% CI 0.8-3.3).
CONCLUSION: Gynecologic oncologists provide care for the majority of women with endometrial cancer who undergo hysterectomy in the United States and are also involved in the care of a large percentage of women with endometrial hyperplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28594765      PMCID: PMC5484072          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  28 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome.

Authors:  M M Chowdhury; H Dagash; A Pierro
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; William M Burke; Elizabeth T Wilde; Sharyn N Lewin; Abigail S Charles; Jin Hee Kim; Noah Goldman; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Joseph D Phillips; Colin E Rock; Amanda Hayman; Jay B Prystowsky; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Simplified frailty index to predict adverse outcomes and mortality in vascular surgery patients.

Authors:  Joseph Karam; Athanasios Tsiouris; Alexander Shepard; Vic Velanovich; Ilan Rubinfeld
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 1.466

6.  Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Jennifer Tsui; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Measurement and validation of frailty as a predictor of outcomes in women undergoing major gynaecological surgery.

Authors:  E M George; W M Burke; J Y Hou; A I Tergas; L Chen; A I Neugut; C V Ananth; D L Hershman; J D Wright
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  The benefits of a gynecologic oncologist: a pattern of care study for endometrial cancer treatment.

Authors:  P Y Roland; F J Kelly; C Y Kulwicki; P Blitzer; M Curcio; J W Orr
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study.

Authors:  H Kitchener; A M C Swart; Q Qian; C Amos; M K B Parmar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  The Relevance of Gynecologic Oncologists to Provide High-Quality of Care to Women with Gynecological Cancer.

Authors:  Lucas Minig; Pablo Padilla-Iserte; Cristina Zorrero
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  1 in total

1.  Changes in Surgical Volume and Outcomes Over Time for Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Maria P Ruiz; Ling Chen; Lisa R Gabor; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.