E M George1, W M Burke1,2,3, J Y Hou1,2,3, A I Tergas1,2,3,4, L Chen1, A I Neugut2,3,4,5, C V Ananth1,4, D L Hershman2,3,4,5, J D Wright1,2,3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. 2. Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. 3. New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Frailty is the loss of physical or mental reserve that impairs function, often in the absence of a defined comorbidity. Our aim was to determine whether a modified frailty index (mFI) correlates with morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hysterectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Hospitals across the USA participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). SAMPLE: Patients who underwent hysterectomy from 2008 to 2012. METHODS: An mFI was calculated using 11 variables in NSQIP. The associations between mFI and morbidity and mortality were assessed. Model fit statistics (c-statistics) were utilised to evaluate the ability of mFI to distinguish outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Wound infection, severe complications and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 66 105 patients were identified. Wound complications increased from 2.4% in patients with an mFI of zero to 4.8% in those with mFI ≥ 0.5 (P < 0.0001). Similarly, severe complications increased from 0.98% to 7.3% (P < 0.0001), overall complications rose from 3.7% to 14.5% (P < 0.0001) and mortality increased from 0.06% to 3.2% (P < 0.0001) for patients with a frailty index of zero compared with those with an index of ≥ 0.5. Versus chance, the goodness-of-fit c-statistics suggested that mFI increases the ability to detect wound complications by 11.4%, severe complications by 22.0% and overall complications by 11.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The mFI is easily reproducible from routinely collected clinical data and predictive of outcomes in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Frailty may be useful in the preoperative risk assessment of women undergoing gynaecological surgery. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Frailty may be useful in the preoperative risk assessment of women undergoing gynaecological surgery.
OBJECTIVE: Frailty is the loss of physical or mental reserve that impairs function, often in the absence of a defined comorbidity. Our aim was to determine whether a modified frailty index (mFI) correlates with morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hysterectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Hospitals across the USA participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). SAMPLE: Patients who underwent hysterectomy from 2008 to 2012. METHODS: An mFI was calculated using 11 variables in NSQIP. The associations between mFI and morbidity and mortality were assessed. Model fit statistics (c-statistics) were utilised to evaluate the ability of mFI to distinguish outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Wound infection, severe complications and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 66 105 patients were identified. Wound complications increased from 2.4% in patients with an mFI of zero to 4.8% in those with mFI ≥ 0.5 (P < 0.0001). Similarly, severe complications increased from 0.98% to 7.3% (P < 0.0001), overall complications rose from 3.7% to 14.5% (P < 0.0001) and mortality increased from 0.06% to 3.2% (P < 0.0001) for patients with a frailty index of zero compared with those with an index of ≥ 0.5. Versus chance, the goodness-of-fit c-statistics suggested that mFI increases the ability to detect wound complications by 11.4%, severe complications by 22.0% and overall complications by 11.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The mFI is easily reproducible from routinely collected clinical data and predictive of outcomes in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Frailty may be useful in the preoperative risk assessment of women undergoing gynaecological surgery. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Frailty may be useful in the preoperative risk assessment of women undergoing gynaecological surgery.
Authors: N M de Vries; J B Staal; C D van Ravensberg; J S M Hobbelen; M G M Olde Rikkert; M W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Samuel Cykert; Peggye Dilworth-Anderson; Michael H Monroe; Paul Walker; Franklin R McGuire; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Lloyd J Edwards; Audrina Jones Bunton Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mara A Schonberg; Edward R Marcantonio; Donglin Li; Rebecca A Silliman; Long Ngo; Ellen P McCarthy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Martin A Makary; Dorry L Segev; Peter J Pronovost; Dora Syin; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Purvi Patel; Ryan Takenaga; Lara Devgan; Christine G Holzmueller; Jing Tian; Linda P Fried Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Waddah B Al-Refaie; Helen M Parsons; William G Henderson; Eric H Jensen; Todd M Tuttle; Selwyn M Vickers; David A Rothenberger; Beth A Virnig Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jason D Wright; Randall K Gibb; Sajeena Geevarghese; Matthew A Powell; Thomas J Herzog; David G Mutch; Perry W Grigsby; Feng Gao; Kathryn M Trinkaus; Janet S Rader Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A C Panayi; A R Orkaby; D Sakthivel; Y Endo; D Varon; D Roh; D P Orgill; R L Neppl; H Javedan; S Bhasin; I Sinha Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Brett E Youngerman; Alfred I Neugut; Jingyan Yang; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright; Jeffrey N Bruce Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jason D Wright; Ling Chen; Lisa Gabor; William M Burke; Ana I Tergas; June Y Hou; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Ziyi Wang; Deyu Meng; Shichun He; Hongzhi Guo; Zhibo Tian; Meiqi Wei; Guang Yang; Ziheng Wang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-04 Impact factor: 4.614