Literature DB >> 28594415

Expanded carrier screening: what determines intended participation and can this be influenced by message framing and narrative information?

Jan S Voorwinden1, Anne H Buitenhuis1, Erwin Birnie2, Anneke M Lucassen3, Marian A Verkerk4, Irene M van Langen2, Mirjam Plantinga2, Adelita V Ranchor1.   

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing enabled us to create a population-based expanded carrier screening (ECS) test that simultaneously tests for 50 serious autosomal recessive diseases. Before offering this test universally, we wanted to know what factors are related to intended participation and how the general public can be informed about the test without being influenced in their intention to participate. We studied this by measuring to what extent 'message framing' and 'narrative information' can influence people's intended participation. Data were collected by means of an online survey of 504 potential users, and the factors examined were based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and on previous research on intended participation in preconception carrier screening. Message framing was manipulated by explaining the risk of couple carriership in different ways, while narrative information was provided to only half of the respondents. The factors most positively related to intended participation were perceiving benefits of the screening, having a positive attitude towards the screening, having no religion, having an actual child wish and experiencing the choice to participate as easy. Perceived benefits and a positive attitude were most influential factors by far. Message framing and narrative information had no significant effect on intended participation, reinforcing that message framing and narrative information can help to inform the general public about ECS without influencing their intended participation. Future research should study if the importance of perceived benefits and a positive attitude can be replicated when other factors are included and when actual participation is measured instead of intended participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28594415      PMCID: PMC5520082          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  22 in total

1.  Can the theory of planned behavior explain patterns of health behavior change?

Authors:  P Sheeran; M Conner; P Norman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Participation in preconceptional carrier couple screening: characteristics, attitudes, and knowledge of both partners.

Authors:  L Henneman; I Bramsen; H M van der Ploeg; H J Adèr; H E van der Horst; J J Gille; L P ten Kate
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 3.  Factors affecting decisions to accept or decline cystic fibrosis carrier testing/screening: a theory-guided systematic review.

Authors:  Lei-Shih Chen; Patricia Goodson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  Interventions to improve risk communication in clinical genetics: systematic review.

Authors:  A Edwards; J Gray; A Clarke; J Dundon; G Elwyn; C Gaff; K Hood; R Iredale; S Sivell; C Shaw; H Thornton
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-01-18

5.  Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Determinants of first trimester combined test participation within the central region of the Netherlands.

Authors:  Neeltje M T H Crombag; Peter C J I Schielen; Chantal W Hukkelhoven; Rita Iedema; Jozien M Bensing; Gerard H A Visser; Philip Stoutenbeek; Maria P H Koster
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Advantages of expanded universal carrier screening: what is at stake?

Authors:  Sanne van der Hout; Kim Ca Holtkamp; Lidewij Henneman; Guido de Wert; Wybo J Dondorp
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Factors for successful implementation of population-based expanded carrier screening: learning from existing initiatives.

Authors:  Kim C A Holtkamp; Inge B Mathijssen; Phillis Lakeman; Merel C van Maarle; Wybo J Dondorp; Lidewij Henneman; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Population-based preconception carrier screening: how potential users from the general population view a test for 50 serious diseases.

Authors:  Mirjam Plantinga; Erwin Birnie; Kristin M Abbott; Richard J Sinke; Anneke M Lucassen; Juliette Schuurmans; Seyma Kaplan; Marian A Verkerk; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Population-based carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of 23 years of research.

Authors:  Liane Ioannou; Belinda J McClaren; John Massie; Sharon Lewis; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Laura Forrest; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Clarke; Jennifer L Schneider; Frances Lynch; Tia L Kauffman; Michael C Leo; Ana G Rosales; John F Dickerson; Elizabeth Shuster; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Expanded carrier screening for autosomal recessive conditions in health care: Arguments for a couple-based approach and examination of couples' views.

Authors:  Mirjam Plantinga; Erwin Birnie; Juliette Schuurmans; Anne H Buitenhuis; Elise Boersma; Anneke M Lucassen; Marian A Verkerk; Irene M van Langen; Adelita V Ranchor
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  GP-provided couple-based expanded preconception carrier screening in the Dutch general population: who accepts the test-offer and why?

Authors:  Juliette Schuurmans; Erwin Birnie; Adelita V Ranchor; Kristin M Abbott; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen; Marjolein Y Berger; Marian Verkerk; Irene M van Langen; Mirjam Plantinga
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Preconception expanded carrier screening: Impact of information presented by text or video on genetic knowledge and attitudes.

Authors:  Thirsa Conijn; Stephanie C M Nijmeijer; Phillis Lakeman; Lidewij Henneman; Frits A Wijburg; Lotte Haverman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.537

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.