Literature DB >> 25613681

Determinants of first trimester combined test participation within the central region of the Netherlands.

Neeltje M T H Crombag1, Peter C J I Schielen, Chantal W Hukkelhoven, Rita Iedema, Jozien M Bensing, Gerard H A Visser, Philip Stoutenbeek, Maria P H Koster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to study the association between potentially influential determinants and first-trimester combined test (FCT) uptake rates in the central region of the Netherlands.
METHODS: Data were extracted from the national prenatal screening database Peridos and the Netherlands Perinatal Registry and compared at the level of the health care provider. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis was used to determine the effect of determinants (maternal age, parity, socio-economic status (SES), mode of conception, ethnicity and urbanisation) on uptake.
RESULTS: Prenatal screening data were available for 24 657 women and overall uptake rate was 25.7%. The strongest association with FCT uptake was found for advanced maternal age (β 2.2; 95% CI [1.7, 2.8]). Grand multiparity had a significantly negative association with FCT uptake (β -4.3; 95% CI [-5.9, -2.7]). Positive associations were found for very high urbanisation (β 0.3; 95% CI [0.1, 0.4]) and high SES (β 0.2; 95% CI [0.0, 0.3]).
CONCLUSION: Advanced maternal age is strongly associated with participation in prenatal testing. The role of age related risk perception should be incorporated in future policy making to support women in informed and autonomous decision making. The negative association of grand multiparity and FCT might be religion based but requires further research.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25613681     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  8 in total

1.  Expanded carrier screening: what determines intended participation and can this be influenced by message framing and narrative information?

Authors:  Jan S Voorwinden; Anne H Buitenhuis; Erwin Birnie; Anneke M Lucassen; Marian A Verkerk; Irene M van Langen; Mirjam Plantinga; Adelita V Ranchor
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Prenatal diagnosis in Sweden 2011 to 2013-a register-based study.

Authors:  Kerstin Petersson; Marie Lindkvist; Margareta Persson; Peter Conner; Annika Åhman; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Perspectives, preferences and needs regarding early prediction of preeclampsia in Dutch pregnant women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Neeltje M T H Crombag; Marije Lamain-de Ruiter; Anneke Kwee; Peter C J I Schielen; Jozien M Bensing; Gerard H A Visser; Arie Franx; Maria P H Koster
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Reasons for accepting or declining Down syndrome screening in Dutch prospective mothers within the context of national policy and healthcare system characteristics: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Neeltje M T H Crombag; Hennie Boeije; Rita Iedema-Kuiper; Peter C J I Schielen; Gerard H A Visser; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Factors associated with utilization of maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in mainland China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chuanlin Li; Leiyu Shi; Jiayan Huang; Xu Qian; Yingyao Chen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ingrid A Peters; Kirsten M Heetkamp; Nicolette T C Ursem; Eric A P Steegers; Semiha Denktaş; Maarten F C M Knapen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-03

7.  Facilitating autonomous, confident and satisfying choices: a mixed-method study of women's choice-making in prenatal screening for common aneuploidies.

Authors:  An Chen; Henni Tenhunen; Paulus Torkki; Antti Peltokorpi; Seppo Heinonen; Paul Lillrank; Vedran Stefanovic
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Reasons for non-participation in malformation scans in Denmark: a cohort study.

Authors:  Karina Hjort-Pedersen; Annette Wind Olesen; Ester Garne; Lene Sperling
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.