| Literature DB >> 28594356 |
Ji-Hoon Kim1, Daeung Yu2, Sung-Hwan Eom3, Song-Hee Kim4, Junghwan Oh5,6, Won-Kyo Jung7,8, Young-Mog Kim9,10.
Abstract
The object of this study was to discover an alternative therapeutic agent with fewer side effects against acne vulgaris, one of the most common skin diseases. Acne vulgaris is often associated with acne-related bacteria such as Propionibacteriumacnes, Staphylococcusepidermidis, Staphylococcusaureus, and Pseudomonasaeruginosa. Some of these bacteria exhibit a resistance against commercial antibiotics that have been used in the treatment of acne vulgaris (tetracycline, erythromycin, and lincomycin). In the current study, we tested in vitro antibacterial effect of chitosan-phytochemical conjugates on acne-related bacteria. Three chitosan-phytochemical conjugates used in this study exhibited stronger antibacterial activity than that of chitosan (unmodified control). Chitosan-caffeic acid conjugate (CCA) showed the highest antibacterial effect on acne-related bacteria along with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC; 8 to 256 μg/mL). Additionally, the MIC values of antibiotics against antibiotic-resistant P. acnes and P.aeruginosa strains were dramatically reduced in combination with CCA, suggesting that CCA would restore the antibacterial activity of the antibiotics. The analysis of fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices clearly revealed a synergistic antibacterial effect of CCA with antibiotics. Thus, the median sum of FIC (∑FIC) values against the antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains ranged from 0.375 to 0.533 in the combination mode of CCA and antibiotics. The results of the present study suggested a potential possibility of chitosan-phytochemical conjugates in the control of infections related to acne vulgaris.Entities:
Keywords: acne vulgaris; antibiotic resistance; chitosan-phytochemical conjugates; synergistic antibacterial effect
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28594356 PMCID: PMC5484117 DOI: 10.3390/md15060167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the chitosan-phytochemical conjugates against acne-related bacteria.
| Strain | MIC (μg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCA 1 | CFA 2 | CSA 3 | Unmodified Chitosan | |
| 8 | 16 | 16 | 16 | |
| 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 | |
| 16 | 32 | 32 | 32 | |
| 256 | 256 | 256 | 512 | |
| 256 | 256 | 256 | 512 | |
| 128 | 256 | 256 | 256 | |
1 CCA, chitosan-caffeic acid; 2 CFA, chitosan-ferulic acid; 3 CSA, chitosan-sinapic acid.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tetracycline, erythromycin, and lincomycin against acne-related bacteria.
| Strain | MIC (μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Erythromycin | Lincomycin | Tetracycline | |
| 2 | 4 | 0.5 | |
| 0.125 | 0.25 | 2 | |
| 16 | 64 | 0.125 | |
| 1024 | 1024 | 32 | |
| 1024 | 1024 | 16 | |
| 0.125 | 1 | 0.125 | |
| Soussy’s MIC breakpoints 1 | 1–4 1 | 2–8 1 | 4–8 1 |
1 Soussy et al. [32].
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices of chitosan–caffeic acid (CCA) in combination with antibiotics against antibiotic-resistant acne-related bacteria.
| Strains | Test Compound | MIC (μg/mL) | Median ∑FIC 1 | ∑FICmax 2 | ∑FICmin 3 | Minimum Concentration for Observing Synergy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCA | 256 | 0.533 | 1.016 | 0.188 | 64.0 | |
| Tetracycline | 32 | 4.0 | ||||
| CCA | 256 | 0.502 | 1.004 | 0.375 | 64.0 | |
| Tetracycline | 16 | 4.0 | ||||
| CCA | 256 | 0.502 | 1.004 | 0.188 | 32.0 | |
| Erythromycin | 1024 | 64.0 | ||||
| CCA | 256 | 0.502 | 1.016 | 0.313 | 64.0 | |
| Erythromycin | 1024 | 128.0 | ||||
| CCA | 16 | 0.5 | 1.063 | 0.266 | 4.0 | |
| Erythromycin | 16 | 0.5 | ||||
| CCA | 256 | 0.504 | 1.016 | 0.375 | 64.0 | |
| Lincomycin | 1024 | 256.0 | ||||
| CCA | 256 | 0.502 | 1.016 | 0.313 | 64.0 | |
| Lincomycin | 1024 | 256.0 | ||||
| CCA | 16 | 0.375 | 1.063 | 0.266 | 4.0 | |
| Lincomycin | 64 | 16.0 |
1 ∑FIC, the sum of FICs; 2 ∑FICmax, the highest, ∑FIC; 3 ∑FICmin, the lowest ∑FIC. The FIC index indicated synergistic effect: <0.5, marked synergy; 0.5 to <1.0, weak synergy; 1.0, additive; >1.0 to <2.0, subadditive; 2.0, indifferent; >2.0, antagonistic.