Literature DB >> 390067

Comparison of techniques for measurement of in vitro antibiotic synergism.

C W Norden, H Wentzel, E Keleti.   

Abstract

The methods and criteria for testing for synergy were compared with use of 22 strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae and a combination of cephalothin and gentamicin. With the checkerboard technique, the frequency of synergy varied depending on the criterion employed. When the rate of killing of bacteria by antibiotics was measured, results varied depending on the size of inoculum. When the checkerboard and killing-curve techniques were compared, there was poor correlation in terms of the frequency of strains showing synergy. Because clinical observations suggest that treatment of serious infections with combinations of antibiotics found to be synergistic in vitro may enhance survival, standardization of the methods and criteria used to test for synergy should be undertaken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 390067     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/140.4.629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  46 in total

1.  Mechanism of synergy between epigallocatechin gallate and beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  W H Zhao; Z Q Hu; S Okubo; Y Hara; T Shimamura
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparison of three different in vitro methods of detecting synergy: time-kill, checkerboard, and E test.

Authors:  R L White; D S Burgess; M Manduru; J A Bosso
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Use of pharmacodynamic parameters to predict efficacy of combination therapy by using fractional inhibitory concentration kinetics.

Authors:  J G den Hollander; J W Mouton; H A Verbrugh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Serum bactericidal rate as measure of antibiotic interactions.

Authors:  L L Briceland; M T Pasko; J M Mylotte
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Antibiotic combinations: should they be tested?

Authors:  G M Eliopoulos; C T Eliopoulos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Serum bactericidal test.

Authors:  C W Stratton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Indole and (E)-2-hexenal, phytochemical potentiators of polymyxins against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A Kubo; C S Lunde; I Kubo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  When does 2 plus 2 equal 5? A review of antimicrobial synergy testing.

Authors:  Christopher D Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Use of pharmacodynamic indices to predict efficacy of combination therapy in vivo.

Authors:  J W Mouton; M L van Ogtrop; D Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Synergism of polygodial and trans-cinnamic acid on inhibition of root elongation in lettuce seedling growth bioassays.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Fujita; Isao Kubo
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.