Omesh Goyal1, Monika Bansal2, Ajit Sood2. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Near Rose Garden, Tagore Nagar, Civil Lines, Ludhiana, 141 001, India. goyalomesh@yahoo.co.in. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Near Rose Garden, Tagore Nagar, Civil Lines, Ludhiana, 141 001, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data on the spectrum of esophageal motility disorders in Indian population are scarce. We aimed to study the symptomatic and manometric profile of patients with suspected esophageal motility disorders. METHODS: Consecutive patients with esophageal symptoms who underwent esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) from January 2010 to December 2014 were included in this retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data. HRM was performed with 22-channel water-perfusion system and patients classified using Chicago classification v3.0. RESULTS: Of the 401 patients studied [median age 43 (18-85) years; 61% males], 217 presented with dysphagia, 157 with predominant retrosternal discomfort and 27 with predominant regurgitation. Among patients with dysphagia, 43.8% had ineffective esophageal motility [IEM], 26.3% had achalasia cardia [AC], 6.9% had distal esophageal spasm [DES] and 19.4% had normal manometry [NM]. Among patients with retrosternal discomfort, 42.7% had IEM, 5.7% had AC, 4.5% had DES and 42% had NM. AC was significantly more common among patients presenting with dysphagia compared to those with retrosternal discomfort [p< 0.001] or regurgitation [p< 0.001]. NM was significantly more common among patients presenting with retrosternal symptoms compared to those with dysphagia [p< 0.001]. AC patients had longer duration of dysphagia, more frequent bolus obstruction and more weight loss compared to those with IEM or NM [p< 0.05]. CONCLUSION: Dysphagia was the commonest presenting symptom followed by retrosternal discomfort. Ineffective esophageal motility (not achalasia cardia) was the commonest manometric finding both among patients with dysphagia and retrosternal discomfort. This study highlights the high prevalence of IEM among patients with esophageal symptoms, which can present with dysphagia or retrosternal discomfort due to poor bolus transit.
BACKGROUND: Data on the spectrum of esophageal motility disorders in Indian population are scarce. We aimed to study the symptomatic and manometric profile of patients with suspected esophageal motility disorders. METHODS: Consecutive patients with esophageal symptoms who underwent esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) from January 2010 to December 2014 were included in this retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data. HRM was performed with 22-channel water-perfusion system and patients classified using Chicago classification v3.0. RESULTS: Of the 401 patients studied [median age 43 (18-85) years; 61% males], 217 presented with dysphagia, 157 with predominant retrosternal discomfort and 27 with predominant regurgitation. Among patients with dysphagia, 43.8% had ineffective esophageal motility [IEM], 26.3% had achalasia cardia [AC], 6.9% had distal esophageal spasm [DES] and 19.4% had normal manometry [NM]. Among patients with retrosternal discomfort, 42.7% had IEM, 5.7% had AC, 4.5% had DES and 42% had NM. AC was significantly more common among patients presenting with dysphagia compared to those with retrosternal discomfort [p< 0.001] or regurgitation [p< 0.001]. NM was significantly more common among patients presenting with retrosternal symptoms compared to those with dysphagia [p< 0.001]. AC patients had longer duration of dysphagia, more frequent bolus obstruction and more weight loss compared to those with IEM or NM [p< 0.05]. CONCLUSION:Dysphagia was the commonest presenting symptom followed by retrosternal discomfort. Ineffective esophageal motility (not achalasia cardia) was the commonest manometric finding both among patients with dysphagia and retrosternal discomfort. This study highlights the high prevalence of IEM among patients with esophageal symptoms, which can present with dysphagia or retrosternal discomfort due to poor bolus transit.
Authors: Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: José M Conchillo; Nam Q Nguyen; Melvin Samsom; Richard H Holloway; André J P M Smout Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: D R Suthahar; S Malathi; V Vidyanathan; R Ranjan; S J Kumar; S Ramathilakam; N Dinakaran; V Jayanthi Journal: Trop Gastroenterol Date: 1994 Apr-Jun