Literature DB >> 33489506

Spectrum and Clinical Outcome of Motility Disorders on High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry: A Study From a Tertiary Center on Patients With Dysphagia in Pakistan.

Hareem Rehman1, Adeel Abid1, Safia Awan2, Farheen L Hashmi1, Shahab Abid3.   

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders in a Pakistani population. It also evaluates the outcomes of management of patients with esophageal dysphagia and no structural abnormality on endoscopy. Methods This is a cross-sectional study. Patients with symptoms of dysphagia with normal endoscopy were subjected to esophageal manometry and to barium swallow as a part of routine workup. Esophageal motility disorders diagnosed by HRM were compared to barium swallow findings. A follow-up of these patients was done after a one-year interval to evaluate improvement in their symptoms. Results A total of 202 patients underwent HRM. There were abnormal findings in 160 patients (79.2%) with achalasia being the most common diagnosis in 35.6% of the total patients. Out of 72 patients diagnosed to have achalasia on HRM, only 46 (32.6%) had similar findings on barium esophagram and this difference is statistically significant, p < 0.001). Among achalasia patients, laparoscopic surgery was performed in 22 (30.5%) patients with 59% patients reporting a good to excellent improvement (>50%) in their symptoms, balloon dilatations were done in 47 (65.27%) patients with a good to excellent improvement in symptoms in 55% patients. Only three patients (5.5%) were given botulinum toxin injections, and two of them had an improvement of >50% in their symptoms. Patients with motility disorders other than achalasia were treated with a combination of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), calcium channel blockers and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Conclusion Achalasia was the most common esophageal motility disorder in our population. HRM can diagnose significantly more patients with achalasia compared to barium swallow. Likewise, HRM was helpful in detecting other esophageal motility disorders and planning their management.
Copyright © 2020, Rehman et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  achalasia; dysphagia; manometry

Year:  2020        PMID: 33489506      PMCID: PMC7805506          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  17 in total

1.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  H Inoue; H Minami; Y Kobayashi; Y Sato; M Kaga; M Suzuki; H Satodate; N Odaka; H Itoh; S Kudo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Utility of Esophagram versus High-Resolution Manometry in the Detection of Esophageal Dysmotility.

Authors:  Ashli K O'Rourke; Andreea Lazar; Benjamin Murphy; Donald O Castell; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Oesophageal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Taher Omari
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Clinical diagnosis of achalasia: how reliable is the barium x-ray?

Authors:  I El-Takli; P O'Brien; W G Paterson
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  Current therapies for achalasia: comparison and efficacy.

Authors:  M F Vaezi; J E Richter
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Radiographic detection of achalasia: diagnostic accuracy of videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  W Schima; J M Ryan; M Harisinghani; E Schober; P Pokieser; D M Denk; G Stacher
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 8.  Bridging the Gap between Advancements in the Evolution of Diagnosis and Treatment towards Better Outcomes in Achalasia.

Authors:  Seng-Kee Chuah; Chee-Sang Lim; Chih-Ming Liang; Hung-I Lu; Keng-Liang Wu; Chi-Sin Changchien; Wei-Chen Tai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Effect of Cold Water on Esophageal Motility in Patients With Achalasia and Non-obstructive Dysphagia: A High-resolution Manometry Study.

Authors:  Alessandra Elvevi; Ivana Bravi; Aurelio Mauro; Delia Pugliese; Andrea Tenca; Ivan Cortinovis; Silvano Milani; Dario Conte; Roberto Penagini
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.924

10.  Assessment of Esophageal Motor Disorders Using High-resolution Manometry in Esophageal Dysphagia With Normal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Xiu Wang; Yao Yu; Xiaowen Xu; Jing Wang; Yuting Jia; Hong Xu
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.924

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the Non-conventional Achalasia Treatment Modalities.

Authors:  Francisco Tustumi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  Different patterns of esophageal motility disorders among patients with dysphagia and normal endoscopy: A 2-center experience.

Authors:  Mariam S Zaghloul; Yasmine A Elshaer; Mohamed E Ramadan; Hassan E ElBatae
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.