Literature DB >> 20373080

Manometric and symptomatic spectrum of motor dysphagia in a tertiary referral center in northern India.

Asha Misra1, Dipti Chourasia, Uday C Ghoshal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We studied the spectrum of motor dysphagia in a northern Indian tertiary referral center.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with motor dysphagia referred to the Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology and Motility Laboratory from 2002 to 2007 were evaluated clinically and with eight-channel water-perfusion manometry. Causes of dysphagia were diagnosed using standard criteria.
RESULTS: Of 250 patients (age 41.3 [15.0] years, 146 men), 193 (77%) had achalasia cardia (AC) and 57 (23%) had other causes (11, 4.4%: diffuse esophageal spasm [DES]; 9, 3.6%: hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter [Hy LES]); manometry was normal in 37 patients. Twenty-seven patients (14%) had vigorous AC. Duration of dysphagia at presentation was longer in those with AC and Hy LES than in normal manometry (NM) (21 months [1-180] vs. 6 [1-360], p = 0.000; 24 months [7-48] vs. 6 [1-360], p = 0.015). Regurgitation and bolus obstruction were more frequent in those with AC than in NM (89/154, 57.79% vs. 3/27, 11.11%, p = 0.000001). Heartburn was less frequent in patients with AC than in others (AC: 4/146, 2.73% vs. normal: 4/27, 14.8% [p = 0.02] and others: 3/15, 20% [p = 0.018]). Chest pain was reported by 74/135 (54.8%) classic and 12/19 (63.2%) vigorous AC (p = NS). Patients with NM had lower LES pressure than those with classic AC, Hy LES and vigorous AC (p < 0.0001 in each case). Patients with DES had lower LES pressure than in classic AC, Hy LES and vigorous AC (p = 0.043, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.002, respectively). Patients with classic AC had lower LES pressure than in Hy LES and vigorous AC (p = 0.024, p = 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Classic AC was the commonest cause of motor dysphagia in our center. AC was associated with higher LES pressure, longer duration of dysphagia, frequent regurgitation and bolus obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20373080     DOI: 10.1007/s12664-010-0002-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0254-8860


  28 in total

Review 1.  Challenging the limits of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  The changing faces of the nutcracker esophagus.

Authors:  C B Dalton; D O Castell; J E Richter
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Etiology and pathogenesis of achalasia: the current understanding.

Authors:  Woosuk Park; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Oesophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  J E Richter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Correlation of manometric and radiographic diagnosis in esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  S J Bhatia; G H Malkan; P Ravi; P Abraham
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-10

6.  The hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  N Katada; R A Hinder; P R Hinder; R J Lund; G Perdikis; R A Stalzer; T R McGinn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Long-term follow-up after pneumatic dilation for achalasia cardia: factors associated with treatment failure and recurrence.

Authors:  U C Ghoshal; S Kumar; V A Saraswat; R Aggarwal; A Misra; G Choudhuri
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Achalasia.

Authors:  L Dughera; P Cassolino; F Cisarò; M Chiaverina
Journal:  Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol       Date:  2008-09

9.  Achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, and related motility disorders.

Authors:  G Vantrappen; J Janssens; J Hellemans; G Coremans
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Monika A Kwiatek; Thomas Nealis; William Bulsiewicz; Jennifer Post; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  8 in total

1.  Etiological spectrum of motor dysphagia as per Chicago Classification--Experience at a tertiary center in Central India.

Authors:  Mayank Jain; Sandip Ware; Amit Bundiwal; Shohini Sircar; Ajay K Jain
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03

2.  Achalasia cardia: A diagnosis often delayed!

Authors:  Mayank Jain
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-04

3.  Chicago classification of high-resolution esophageal manometry: is old the gold or is new better?

Authors:  Uday C Ghoshal
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03

4.  Esophageal motility disorders-Symptomatic and manometric spectrum in Punjab, northern India.

Authors:  Omesh Goyal; Monika Bansal; Ajit Sood
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-08

5.  Retrospective study on symptoms and treatment modalities used and short-term follow up of achalasia cardia in Indian setting.

Authors:  Mayank Jain; Neha Baijal; Melpakkam Srinivas; Rajiv Baijal; Nitesh Pratap; Vatsal Bachkaniwala; P Ganesh; Jayanthi Venkataraman
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2020-03-24

6.  A review of factors predicting outcome of pneumatic dilation in patients with achalasia cardia.

Authors:  Uday C Ghoshal; Murali Rangan
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.924

7.  Achalasia Is Associated With eNOS4a4a, iNOS22GA, and nNOS29TT Genotypes: A Case-control Study.

Authors:  Rajan Singh; Uday C Ghoshal; Asha Misra; Balraj Mittal
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.924

8.  Different patterns of esophageal motility disorders among patients with dysphagia and normal endoscopy: A 2-center experience.

Authors:  Mariam S Zaghloul; Yasmine A Elshaer; Mohamed E Ramadan; Hassan E ElBatae
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.