Literature DB >> 28588730

Conversion to monotherapy with luteinizing-hormone releasing hormone agonist or orchiectomy after reaching PSA nadir following maximal androgen blockade is able to prolong progression-free survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.

Gyeong Eun Min1, Hanjong Ahn2.   

Abstract

The present study evaluated androgen deprivation methods to determine the approach that most improves the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Patients had received continuous maximal androgen blockade (MAB) or monotherapy [luteinizing-hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist or orchiectomy] following the reaching of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) nadir. The medical records of 293 patients who received MAB following a diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Following attainment of the PSA nadir and treatment with MAB, patients were maintained on continuous MAB (group CMAB) or converted to monotherapy (group MONO). Disease progression, defined as progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer, was evaluated and compared between the treatment modalities. PFS was compared between patients who received CMAB vs. MONO using 2:1 (102:53) propensity score matching; the basic clinicopathological characteristics (age, Gleason score, PSA and extent of bone metastasis) were similar between the groups. Disease progression was observed in 70.9% of all patients, with a median treatment period of 22.7 months. The median PFS time was 19.5 months in the CMAB group and 28.8 months in the MONO group (P=0.008). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that PFS was significantly associated with the type of maintenance androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; log rank <0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that the type of maintenance ADT and the pretreatment extent of bone metastasis were independent predictors of prolonged PFS. In this propensity score matched-analysis, conversion to monotherapy with a LHRH agonist or orchiectomy following attainment of the PSA nadir with initial MAB, prolonged the PFS, suggesting that monotherapy maintenance following initial MAB may benefit patients by reducing side effects without decreasing treatment efficacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  androgen; disease-free survival; neoplasm metastasis; prostatic neoplasm

Year:  2017        PMID: 28588730      PMCID: PMC5452888          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  28 in total

1.  [A way of thinking of a MAB therapy for local/locally advanced prostate cancer: the theory and recent evaluation].

Authors:  Hideyuki Akaza; Fernand Labrie; Mikio Namiki
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  2007-04

2.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Single-therapy androgen suppression in men with advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Seidenfeld; D J Samson; V Hasselblad; N Aronson; P C Albertsen; C L Bennett; T J Wilt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-04-04       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Reduced incidence of bony metastasis at initial prostate cancer diagnosis: data from CaPSURE.

Authors:  Charles J Ryan; Eric P Elkin; Eric J Small; Janeen Duchane; Peter Carroll
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  The FinnProstate Study VII: intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Arto J Salonen; Kimmo Taari; Martti Ala-Opas; Jouko Viitanen; Seppo Lundstedt; Teuvo L J Tammela
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Current status of primary pharmacotherapy and future perspectives toward upfront therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Masaki Shiota; Masatoshi Eto
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.369

7.  Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maha Hussain; Catherine M Tangen; Donna L Berry; Celestia S Higano; E David Crawford; Glenn Liu; George Wilding; Stephen Prescott; Subramanian Kanaga Sundaram; Eric Jay Small; Nancy Ann Dawson; Bryan J Donnelly; Peter M Venner; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Paul F Schellhammer; David I Quinn; Derek Raghavan; Benjamin Ely; Carol M Moinpour; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Intermittent androgen deprivation for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer: results from a randomised phase 3 study of the South European Uroncological Group.

Authors:  Fernando E C Calais da Silva; Aldo V Bono; Peter Whelan; Maurizio Brausi; Anton Marques Queimadelos; Jose A Portillo Martin; Ziya Kirkali; Fernando M V Calais da Silva; Chris Robertson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of 22 randomised trials with 3283 deaths in 5710 patients. Prostate Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.