Literature DB >> 16962488

Reduced incidence of bony metastasis at initial prostate cancer diagnosis: data from CaPSURE.

Charles J Ryan1, Eric P Elkin, Eric J Small, Janeen Duchane, Peter Carroll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite stage migration as a result of screening, many individuals are diagnosed each year with metastatic (M+), as opposed to localized (M0), prostate cancer. This study describes features that characterize patients with M+ compared to those diagnosed with M0 disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE), a national, longitudinal registry of men with prostate cancer, formed the basis of this study. The prevalence, and changes with time, of patients with M+ and M0 cancer by clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were examined.
RESULTS: Of 10,113 patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2003, 266 (2.6%) had M+ disease at diagnosis. From 1990 to 1997, 4.2% of 4020 total patients had M+ versus 1.6% of 6093 total patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2003 (odds ratio 0.34; 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.48; P < 0.0001). In univariate analysis, advanced age, higher prostate-specific antigen, Gleason grade, black race, lower income, and lower educational level were associated with M+ versus M0 disease (P < 0.01). However, in multivariate analysis, only higher serum prostate-specific antigen and higher Gleason grade, and not the sociodemographic variables, remained associated with M+ disease (P < 0.01). Patients with M+ diagnosed between 1998 and 2003 are more likely to harbor high-grade (Gleason > or =8) primary tumors (62% vs. 45%, P = 0.02) than those diagnosed between 1990 and 1997. No changes in age, race, education, insurance status, or income were observed in the early versus late era.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings show a reduction in the incidence of metastatic disease at initial prostate cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, biologic, rather than socioeconomic, factors are associated with this type of disease presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16962488     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  24 in total

1.  Does the presence of robotic surgery affect demographics in patients choosing to undergo radical prostatectomy? A multi-center contemporary analysis.

Authors:  Philippa J Cheetham; Daniel J Lee; Anna Rose-Morris; Simon F Brewster; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-07-10

2.  Urological cancer: Enzalutamide in metastatic CRPC-old dog, new tricks.

Authors:  Che-Kai Tsao; William K Oh
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Prostate cancer bone metastases on staging prostate MRI: prevalence and clinical features associated with their diagnosis.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Rachel Schor-Bardach; Niamh Long; Anna N Kirzner; Jane D Cunningham; Debra A Goldman; Chaya S Moskowitz; Ramon E Sosa; Evis Sala; David M Panicek; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-01

Review 4.  [Cytoreductive, radical prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Chaloupka; A Herlemann; A Spek; C Gratzke; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Current paradigms and evolving concepts in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sumanta Kumar Pal; Oliver Sartor
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 6.  Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ajjai Alva; Maha Hussain
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-03

7.  The Development of Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate (ICECaP).

Authors:  Christopher Sweeney; Mari Nakabayashi; Meredith Regan; Wanling Xie; Julia Hayes; Nancy Keating; Suhui Li; Tomas Philipson; Marc Buyse; Susan Halabi; Philip Kantoff; A Oliver Sartor; Howard Soule; Brandon Mahal
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Conversion to monotherapy with luteinizing-hormone releasing hormone agonist or orchiectomy after reaching PSA nadir following maximal androgen blockade is able to prolong progression-free survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Gyeong Eun Min; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 9.  Preoperative therapy for localized prostate cancer: a comprehensive overview.

Authors:  Jensen Hu; JoAnn Hsu; Paulo G Bergerot; Bertram E Yuh; Cy A Stein; Sumanta K Pal
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Chemotherapy for metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer.

Authors:  R E Miller; C J Sweeney
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.