Literature DB >> 22498230

The FinnProstate Study VII: intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Arto J Salonen1, Kimmo Taari, Martti Ala-Opas, Jouko Viitanen, Seppo Lundstedt, Teuvo L J Tammela.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized trial to compare intermittent and continuous androgen deprivation in patients with advanced prostate cancer. We studied time to progression, overall and prostate cancer specific survival, and time to treatment failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1997 and February 2003, 852 men with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer were enrolled to receive androgen deprivation therapy for 24 weeks. Patients in whom prostate specific antigen decreased to less than 10 ng/ml, or by 50% or more if less than 20 ng/ml at baseline, were randomized to intermittent or continuous androgen deprivation. In the intermittent therapy arm androgen deprivation therapy was withdrawn and resumed again for at least 24 weeks based mainly on prostate specific antigen decrease and increase.
RESULTS: There were 298 patients who did not meet the randomization criteria. The remaining 554 patients were randomized, with 274 (49.5%) to intermittent androgen deprivation and 280 (50.5%) to the continuous androgen deprivation arm. Median followup was 65.0 months. Of these patients 392 (71%) died, including 186 (68%) in the intermittent androgen deprivation arm and 206 (74%) in the continuous androgen deprivation arm (p=0.12). There were 248 prostate cancer deaths, comprised of 117 (43%) in the intermittent androgen deprivation and 131 (47%) in the continuous androgen deprivation arm (p=0.29). Median times from randomization to progression were 34.5 and 30.2 months in the intermittent androgen deprivation and continuous androgen deprivation arms, respectively. Median times to death (all cause) were 45.2 and 45.7 months, to prostate cancer death 45.2 and 44.3 months, and to treatment failure 29.9 and 30.5 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent androgen deprivation is a feasible, efficient and safe method to treat advanced prostate cancer compared with continuous androgen deprivation.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22498230     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

1.  Efficacy of intermittent androgen deprivation therapy vs conventional continuous androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huei-Ting Tsai; David F Penson; Kepher H Makambi; John H Lynch; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  The role of intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in the management of biochemically recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jasbir Jaswal; Juanita Crook
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Urological cancer. The benefits of intermittent androgen-deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Timur Mitin; Jason A Efstathiou; William U Shipley
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Adoption of Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Population Based Study in American Urology Practice.

Authors:  Huei-Ting Tsai; David Penson; George Luta; John H Lynch; Yingjun Zhou; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2015-07

Review 5.  Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ajjai Alva; Maha Hussain
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-03

6.  Intermittent versus continuous cyproterone acetate in bone metastatic prostate cancer: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Paul C M S Verhagen; Mark F Wildhagen; Annet M Verkerk; Egils Vjaters; Hembo Pagi; Leonhard Kukk; Dejan Bratus; Richard Fiala; Chris H Bangma; Fritz H Schröder; Gerald H J Mickisch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Conversion to monotherapy with luteinizing-hormone releasing hormone agonist or orchiectomy after reaching PSA nadir following maximal androgen blockade is able to prolong progression-free survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Gyeong Eun Min; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Growth of LAPC4 prostate cancer xenograft tumor is insensitive to 5α-reductase inhibitor dutasteride.

Authors:  Raquel Ramos Garcia; Khalid Z Masoodi; Laura E Pascal; Joel B Nelson; Zhou Wang
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2014-04-05

9.  Live to SABR Another Day?

Authors:  Phuoc T Tran; Felix Feng; Piet Ost
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Increased nuclear factor I/B expression in prostate cancer correlates with AR expression.

Authors:  Jagpreet S Nanda; Wisam N Awadallah; Sarah E Kohrt; Petra Popovics; Justin M M Cates; Janni Mirosevich; Peter E Clark; Giovanna A Giannico; Magdalena M Grabowska
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.