Literature DB >> 28587438

Clinical application of the Innovance D-dimer assay in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary thromboembolism.

Zhuxiao Bai1,2, Yurong Huang3, Chenghua Song3, Huimin Liu2, Yihui Chen3, Haitao Zhang3, Xinhong Lu2, Yingbo Song2, Xin Zhang2.   

Abstract

Patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (APTE) have a high short-term mortality rate. The current study aimed to investigate the use of D-dimer in the diagnosis of APTE in suspected APTE patients. All suspected APTE patients were classified into diagnosis or control groups according to the results of a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to evaluate the association between D-dimer values and APTE. Area under the curve (AUC) values and the Youden Index were used to determine D-dimer cut-off levels for the prediction of APTE. The data of 112 suspected APTE patients (54.8% women; mean age, 70.5 years) were analyzed prospectively. There were no significant differences in age (74.5 vs. 73.5 years, P=0.538) or gender distribution (female ratio 56.5 vs. 53.0%, P=0.847) between the diagnosis and control groups. The incidence of symptoms including dyspnea (67.4 vs. 33.3%; P<0.01), chest distress (47.8 vs. 25.8%; P<0.05) and elevated D-dimer (8.49 vs. 0.97 mg/l; P<0.001) were significantly higher in patients with APTE compared with the control group. D-dimer values >3.32 mg/l fibrinogen equivalent units (FEU) were indicative of APTE and the Youden Index was 0.69. The maximum AUC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92), the sensitivity and specificity were 89.13 and 80.30%, respectively, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.53 and 0.14, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 75.90 and 91.40%, respectively. A D-dimer value <0.60 mg/l FEU was the optimal threshold for excluding APTE diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 28.79%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.40 and 0.00, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 49.50 and 100.00%, respectively. Thus, D-dimer levels, combined with clinical assessment, yield high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing APTE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D-dimer; Wells' criteria; acute pulmonary thromboembolism; computed tomography pulmonary angiogram; risk stratification

Year:  2017        PMID: 28587438      PMCID: PMC5450673          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  30 in total

Review 1.  Management of acute pulmonary embolism: a contemporary, risk-tailored approach.

Authors:  Georgios K Chalikias; Dimitrios N Tziakas; Dimitrios A Stakos; Stavros V Konstantinides
Journal:  Hellenic J Cardiol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

2.  D-dimer level is associated with the extent of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  W Ghanima; M Abdelnoor; L O Holmen; B E Nielssen; S Ross; P M Sandset
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography.

Authors:  Arne van Belle; Harry R Büller; Menno V Huisman; Peter M Huisman; Karin Kaasjager; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Mark H H Kramer; Marieke J H A Kruip; Johanna M Kwakkel-van Erp; Frank W G Leebeek; Mathilde Nijkeuter; Martin H Prins; Maaike Sohne; Lidwine W Tick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rene Quiroz; Nils Kucher; Kelly H Zou; Florian Kipfmueller; Philip Costello; Samuel Z Goldhaber; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Prognostic role of alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference in acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Jen Te Hsu; Chi Ming Chu; Shih Tai Chang; Hui Wen Cheng; Nye Jan Cheng; Wan-Ching Ho; Chang Min Chung
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.993

6.  D-dimers and efficacy of clinical risk estimation algorithms: sensitivity in evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Rajan T Gupta; Rajesh K Kakarla; Kevin J Kirshenbaum; Victor F Tapson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Pulmonary embolism: risk assessment and management.

Authors:  Stavros Konstantinides; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Evaluation of an automated, latex-enhanced turbidimetric D-dimer test (advanced D-dimer) and usefulness in the exclusion of acute thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  David B Wilson; Kathy M Gard
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 9.  D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul D Stein; Russell D Hull; Kalpesh C Patel; Ronald E Olson; William A Ghali; Rollin Brant; Rita K Biel; Vinay Bharadia; Neeraj K Kalra
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Adam Torbicki; Arnaud Perrier; Stavros Konstantinides; Giancarlo Agnelli; Nazzareno Galiè; Piotr Pruszczyk; Frank Bengel; Adrian J B Brady; Daniel Ferreira; Uwe Janssens; Walter Klepetko; Eckhard Mayer; Martine Remy-Jardin; Jean-Pierre Bassand
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.