| Literature DB >> 28587219 |
Chi-Yu He, Jie Fu, Jia-Wen Shou1, Zhen-Xiong Zhao2, Long Ren3, Yan Wang4, Jian-Dong Jiang5.
Abstract
Gut microbiota is populated with an immense number of microorganisms, which can be regulated by dietary components and drugs to markedly affect the nutritional and health status of the host. Eight medicinal isoquinoline alkaloids from natural plants were cultured anaerobically with rat gut microbiota and an LC/MSn-IT-TOF technique was used to identify the resulting metabolites. Palmatine, tetrahydropalmatine, dauricine, and tetrandrine containing nitro-hexatomic isoquinoline rings could be easily transformed by the intestinal flora in vitro and a total of nine demethylated metabolites were detected. However, sinomenine, homoharringtonine, harringtonine, and galanthamine, which all contained benzazepine, could not undergo demethylation. Computer-assisted docking was used to analyze the binding between these compounds and sterol 14α-demethylase. The computational results demonstrated that hydrophobic interactions were the main driving force for binding, but the steric hindrance produced by the benzazepine structure resulted in a weak interaction between the hit compounds and the enzyme. This work illustrated that gut microbiota were important in the metabolism of isoquinoline alkaloids.Entities:
Keywords: 14α-demethylase; LC/MSn-IT-TOF; docking; gut microbiota; isoquinoline alkaloids; metabolites
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28587219 PMCID: PMC6152661 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22060932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The chemical structure of eight isoquinoline alkaloids: palmatine, tetrahydropalmatine, dauricine, tetrandrine, sinomenine, homoharringtonine, harringtonine, and galanthamine.
Figure 2Extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of metabolites in the incubation of palmatine (A), tetrahydropalmatine (B), dauricine (C), and tetrandrine (D) in the intestinal bacteria in vitro (positive) ion mode, the m/z values in this chromatogram: A, palmatine, 352.1549; M1, 338.1392; M2, 338.1392; M3, 324.1236; M4, 310.1115. B: tetrahydropalmatine, 326.1867; M5, 342.1662; M6, 328.1471. C: dauricine, 313.1673; M7, 306.1574; M8, 299.1083. D: tetrandrine, 312.1678; M9, 305.1561.
LC/MSn-IT-TOF data obtained for palmatine, tetrahydropalmatine, dauricine, tetrandrine and their metabolites from incubation with intestinal flora in vitro.
| tR(min) | MS1[M + H]+ | MS1[M + 2H]2+ | Fragments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS2
| MS3
| ||||
| Palmatine | 10.9 | 352.1549 | -- | 308.1316, 320.1315 291.1274, 337.1345 336.1270, 307.1144 | 262.0899, 246.0928 234.0912, 277.0773 290.0856, 217.0861 249.0785, 292.0991 264.1043 |
| M1 | 9.2 | 338.1932 | -- | 323.1150, 294.1120 339.1400, 262.0863 279.0867, 308.0943 | 279.0880 |
| M2 | 9.2 | 338.1932 | -- | 323.1150, 294.1120 339.1400, 262.0863 279.0867, 308.0943 | 279.0880 |
| M3 | 9.5 | 324.1249 | -- | -- | -- |
| M4 | 8.2 | 310.1154 | -- | 295.0828, 267.0837 | 297.0936, 266.0826 251.0483, 267.0916 |
| Tetrahydropalmatine | 13.5 | 356.1867 | -- | 192.0936, 308.1205 340.1479, 165.0855 150.0612, 176.0643 338.1975, 204.0948 | 177.0717, 176.0655 165.0817, 148.0697 131.0665, 193.0963 150.0631, 159.0646 |
| M5 | 12.6 | 342.1622 | -- | 192.1041, 165.0932 150.0689, 310.1417 178.0886, 210.1703 135.0425 | 177.0767, 148.0744 159.0649, 131.0724 165.0937 |
| M6 | 11.8 | 328.1471 | -- | 164.0707, 192.1020 150.0677, 137.0582 280.1034, 312.1236 | 137.0616, 150.0686 165.0807, 119.0500 |
| Dauricine | 11.9 | -- | 313.1673 (2) | 313.1699 (2), 297.6498 (2) 282.1284 (2), 266.6156 (2) 290.1368 (2), 406.2091 194.0843 | 313.6692 (2), 297.6483 (2) 290.1350 (2), 282.1252 (2) 209.6039 (2), 266.6156 165.0931 |
| M7 | 11.4 | -- | 306.1574 (2) | 290.6376 (2), 275.1159 (2) 297.6397, 284.6355 269.6195, 259.0936 290.6425, 282.1292 | 275.0978 |
| M8-1 | 12.6 | -- | 299.1083 (2) | 283.6370, 290.6376 277.6312, 268.1075 213.0712 | 268.1075 |
| M8-2 | 14.8 | -- | 299.1083 (2) | 283.6370, 290.6376 277.6312, 268.1075 213.0712 | 268.1075 |
| Tetrandrine | 12.9 | -- | 312.1678 (2) | 296.6400 (2), 281.1251 (2) 198.1021 (2), 366.1744 456.2231, 175.0939 312.6609, 122.0746 231.0251 | 297.1343 (2), 198.0982 (2) 236.0983, 158.0721 122.0712, 274.1006 188.0855 |
| M9-1 | 10.5 | -- | 305.1561 (2) | 191.0947, 190.0876 288.6181, 281.1111 228.5973, 182.5820 367.1695 | 167.0633, 177.0823 168.0735 |
| M9-2 | 12.0 | -- | 305.1561 (2) | 191.0947, 190.0876 288.6181, 281.1111 228.5973, 182.5820 367.1695 | 167.0633, 177.0823 168.0735 |
Figure 3The proposed metabolic pathways of palmatine (A), tetrahydropalmatine (B), dauricine (C), and tetrandrine (D) in intestinal flora after incubation in vitro.
Figure 4Molecular docking between isoquinoline alkaloids [(A) palmatine; (B) tetrahydropalmatine; (C) dauricine; (D) tetrandrine] and sterol 14α-demethylase.
Figure 5Molecular docking between isoquinoline alkaloids [(A) sinomenine; (B) homoharringtonine; (C) harringtonine; (D) galanthamine] with sterol 14α-demethylase.
HPLC analytical conditions of eight isoquinoline alkaloids.
| Compounds | Time (min) | Mobile Phase | Flow Rate (mL·min−1) | Detection Wavelength (nm) | Column Temperature (°C) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | |||||
| Palmatine | 0.5% formic acid in water | acetonitrile | 0.8 | 347 | 40 | |
| 0 | 85% | 15% | ||||
| 10 | 55% | 45% | ||||
| 15 | 40% | 60% | ||||
| 18 | 80% | 20% | ||||
| 25 | 85% | 15% | ||||
| sinomenine | 0.1% formic acid in 10 mmol·L−1 ammonium formate water | acetonitrile | 0.6 | 262 | 30 | |
| 0 | 45% | 55% | ||||
| 25 | 45% | 55% | ||||
| tetrahydropalmatine | 0.2% formic acid in water | acetonitrile | 0.8 | 280 | 30 | |
| 0 | 95% | 5% | ||||
| dauricine | 5 | 90% | 10% | 282 | ||
| tetrandrine | 15 | 50% | 50% | 282 | ||
| homoharringtonine | 25 | 10% | 90% | 288 | ||
| harringtonine | 288 | |||||
| galanthamine | 228 | |||||