| Literature DB >> 34094829 |
Junmei Shang1, Shurong Ma1, Caixia Zang1, Xiuqi Bao1, Yan Wang1, Dan Zhang1.
Abstract
The gut microbiota plays an important role in regulatingEntities:
Keywords: COMT; CYP51; FLZ; Gut microbiota; Parkinson's disease
Year: 2021 PMID: 34094829 PMCID: PMC8148066 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.01.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Primers used for qPCR.
| Gene | Primer sequence |
|---|---|
| Forward: CTGCAAGAGACTTCCATCCAG | |
| Reverse: AGTGGTATAGACAGGTCTGTTGG | |
| Forward: GCTACCTATGTCTTGCCCGT | |
| Reverse: GACCATTGCTGTTTCCTAGG | |
| Forward: ATCAACAAGCAATTCCTCGATGA | |
| Reverse: CAGCATTCGCTTCAAGGACATA | |
| Forward: GAAGTGGGGGTTTAGGATCATC | |
| Reverse: CCTTTCACTTTCGGATAACCA | |
| Forward: GAATTCCCTGGGAGAGAAGC | |
| Reverse: TTCTCACAGGGGAGAAATCG | |
| Forward: AGAAGCTGTGCTATGTTGCTCTA | |
| Reverse: TCAGGCAGCTCATAGCTCTTC |
Figure 1FLZ is metabolized to M1 by the gut microbiota. (A) HPLC chromatogram of FLZ-to-M1 conversion in mice colonic contents (FLZ: tR = 13.8 min, M1: tR = 12.2 min). (B) EIC of M1 and FLZ in positive ion mode, the m/z values in this chromatogram: M1, 436; FLZ, 450. (C) The molecular formula and metabolic process of FLZ to M1. (D) Conversion of FLZ to M1 by the gut microbiota in colonic contents (n = 4 in each group). (E) The ratio of M1/FLZ in 15 intestinal bacteria strains (n = 6 in each group). Data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 4.
Figure 2The metabolism of FLZ and M1 in liver, kidney, and small intestine. Microsomes, S9, and cytosol of liver and kidney as well as small intestine were extracted from mice and then incubated with FLZ or M1. Percentage of FLZ and M1 in mouse liver microsomes, S9, and cytosol incubated with FLZ (A) or M1 (C) at 30 min. Percentage of FLZ and M1 in mouse liver microsomes incubated with FLZ (B) or M1 (D) for 120 min. Percentage of FLZ and M1 in mouse kidney microsomes, S9, and cytosol incubated with FLZ (E) or M1 (F) at 30 min. Percentage of FLZ and M1 in mouse small intestine homogenate incubated with FLZ (G) or M1 (H) for 120 min. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group). ND: not detected.
Figure 3CYP51 contributed to the conversion of FLZ to M1 in the gut microbiota. Molecular docking was performed by BIOVIA Discovery Studio Client software to study the binding activity of CYP51 to FLZ. (A) Molecular docking 3D diagram of FLZ and CYP51. (B) Molecular docking 2D diagram of FLZ and CYP51. The colonic contents were extracted from mice and then incubated with FLZ and Itraconazole or Voriconazole for 6 h. (C) The activity of CYP51 in gut microbiota. (D) The ratio of M1/FLZ in gut microbiota. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. Control.
Figure 4Pharmacokinetics study of FLZ and M1 in mice. Mice were orally administrated with FLZ (50 mg/kg) or M1 (50 mg/kg), and then plasma and brain were collected at different time points. The concentration–time curve of FLZ (A) or M1 (B) in plasma treated with FLZ. (C) The ratio of M1/FLZ in plasma treated with FLZ. The concentration–time curve of FLZ (D) or M1 (E) in plasma treated with M1. (F) The ratio of FLZ/M1 in plasma treated with M1. The concentration-time curve of FLZ in the brain treated with FLZ (G) or M1 (H). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5 in each group).
Figure 5COMT contributed to the conversion of M1 to FLZ in the blood. Blood was collected from mice and then incubated with FLZ or M1 for 120 min. (A) Incubation of FLZ with mouse blood. (B) Incubation of M1 with mouse blood. BIOVIA Discovery Studio Client software was used to perform molecular docking of M1 and COMT. (C) Molecular docking 3D diagram. (D) Molecular docking 2D diagram. Mice blood were extracted from mice and then incubated with M1 and entacapone for 120 min: (E) The activity of COMT in the blood. (F) The ratio of FLZ/M1 in the blood. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group). ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. Control.
Figure 6Effects of the gut microbiota on FLZ absorption in the chronic PD mouse model. The normal control mice, antibiotic-exposed control mice, non-antibiotic-exposed MPTP/p mice, and antibiotic-exposed MPTP/p mice were orally administrated with FLZ 75 mg/kg and the concentrations of FLZ and M1 were detected in plasma, brain, and feces by LC–MS/MS. The concentration of FLZ in the plasma (A), brain (B), and feces (C). The concentration of M1 in the plasma (D), brain (E), and feces (F). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5 in each group). &P < 0.05, &&P < 0.01, &&&P < 0.001 vs. FLZ treated Control mice; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 vs. FLZ treated antibiotic-exposed MPTP/p PD mice.
Figure 7Effects of the gut microbiota on the neuroprotection of FLZ in MPTP/p-induced PD mouse model. FLZ (75 mg/kg) was administered to non-antibiotic-exposed MPTP/p mice and antibiotic-exposed MPTP/p mice for 8 weeks. (A) Rotarod test (n = 12 in each group). (B) Immunohistochemistry of TH staining in substantia nigra (n = 4 in each group). Representative sections of the substantia nigra from four mice were showed. (C) Numbers of TH positive cells (n = 4 in each group). Levels of DA (D), DOPAC (E), and HVA (F) in the striatum. (G) Representative Western blots of CD68 and GFAP. Western blot assay of CD68 (H) and GFAP (I) expression in midbrain. The mRNA expression (n = 5 in each group) of Il-6 (J), Il-1β (K), Iba-1 (L), Cox-2 (M), and Il-10 (N). Data are presented as mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. Control mice; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 vs. MPTP/p mice; &P < 0.05, &&P < 0.01 vs. FLZ treated MPTP/p mice.