BACKGROUND: Diagnostic Exome Sequencing (DES) has been shown to be an effective tool for diagnosis individuals with suspected genetic conditions. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a male infant born with multiple anomalies including bilateral dysplastic kidneys, cleft palate, bilateral talipes, and bilateral absence of thumbs and first toes. Prenatal testing including chromosome analysis and microarray did not identify a cause for the multiple congenital anomalies. Postnatal diagnostic exome studies (DES) were utilized to find a molecular diagnosis for the patient. Exome sequencing of the proband, mother, and father showed a previously unreported maternally inherited RNA binding motif protein 10 (RBM10) c.1352_1353delAG (p.E451Vfs*66) alteration. Mutations in RBM10 are associated with TARP syndrome, an X-linked recessive disorder originally described with cardinal features of talipes equinovarus, atrial septal defect, Robin sequence, and persistent left superior vena cava. CONCLUSION: DES established a molecular genetic diagnosis of TARP syndrome for a neonatal patient with a poor prognosis in whom traditional testing methods were uninformative and allowed for efficient diagnosis and future reproductive options for the parents. Other reported cases of TARP syndrome demonstrate significant variability in clinical phenotype. The reported features in this infant including multiple hemivertebrae, imperforate anus, aplasia of thumbs and first toes have not been reported in previous patients, thus expanding the clinical phenotype for this rare disorder.
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic Exome Sequencing (DES) has been shown to be an effective tool for diagnosis individuals with suspected genetic conditions. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a male infant born with multiple anomalies including bilateral dysplastic kidneys, cleft palate, bilateral talipes, and bilateral absence of thumbs and first toes. Prenatal testing including chromosome analysis and microarray did not identify a cause for the multiple congenital anomalies. Postnatal diagnostic exome studies (DES) were utilized to find a molecular diagnosis for the patient. Exome sequencing of the proband, mother, and father showed a previously unreported maternally inherited RNA binding motif protein 10 (RBM10) c.1352_1353delAG (p.E451Vfs*66) alteration. Mutations in RBM10 are associated with TARP syndrome, an X-linked recessive disorder originally described with cardinal features of talipes equinovarus, atrial septal defect, Robin sequence, and persistent left superior vena cava. CONCLUSION: DES established a molecular genetic diagnosis of TARP syndrome for a neonatal patient with a poor prognosis in whom traditional testing methods were uninformative and allowed for efficient diagnosis and future reproductive options for the parents. Other reported cases of TARP syndrome demonstrate significant variability in clinical phenotype. The reported features in this infant including multiple hemivertebrae, imperforate anus, aplasia of thumbs and first toes have not been reported in previous patients, thus expanding the clinical phenotype for this rare disorder.
Since 2011, Diagnostic Exome Sequencing (DES) has proven to be cost effective and beneficial in providing a broad spectrum of previously undiagnosed patients with molecular genetic diagnoses while broadening the phenotype of known genetic diseases. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommends proper utilization of DES in the clinical assessment of individuals with a suspected genetic condition in which prior genetic testing fails to lead to a diagnosis [1]. The application of DES has allowed many undiagnosed patients who have endured an extensive diagnostic odyssey to receive a definitive genetic diagnosis [2-11].Fetal and neonatal DES is being used more frequently in cases of infant demise, with or without congenital anomalies [4, 12]. Several studies have shown the clinical utility of DES for prenatal and neonatal patients due to increasing ease of DES and knowledge of the human genome [13-15].Herein, we report a previously undiagnosed neonatal patient with a poor prognosis, who was identified to have a hemizygous RBM10 alteration detected by DES establishing a molecular genetic diagnosis of TARP syndrome.
Case presentation
Clinical description
The male proband was born after a prenatal course complicated by anhydramnios and multiple fetal anomalies. Prenatal ultrasound identified bilateral renal aplasia, bilateral talipes, intrauterine growth restriction, and oligohydramnios that progressed to anhydramnios. Amniocentesis was performed during the pregnancy with normal karyotype and microarray. He was delivered at 35 weeks with a birth weight of 1.320 kg (<2%), length 40 cm (<3%) and head circumference 27 cm (<3%) to non-consanguineous parents of Mexican descent. Additional anomalies noted after birth included multiple hemivertebrae, imperforate anus, bilateral undescended testes, aplasia of thumbs and first toes, cleft palate, pulmonary hypoplasia, brachycephaly, and low-set ears (Fig. 1). A renal ultrasound demonstrated atrophic, dysplastic kidneys with scattered parenchymal cysts suggestive of cystic renal dysplasia. No other renal anomalies, such as hydronephrosis were seen. Multiple cardiac anomalies were identified at autopsy including atrial septal defect, unicuspid aortic valve, bicuspid pulmonic valve, and coarctation of the aorta. A head ultrasound showed an unusual head shape with flattening of the posterior calvarium, potentially related to brachycephaly with no other anomalies noted. An MRI was not performed. The patient's family history is unremarkable.
Fig. 1
Clinical features. a. Features including brachycephaly, low set ears consistent with previous patients reported with TARP syndrome. b. Absent thumb. c. Aplasia of first toes
Clinical features. a. Features including brachycephaly, low set ears consistent with previous patients reported with TARP syndrome. b. Absent thumb. c. Aplasia of first toesThe infant’s prognosis was poor due to severe pulmonary hypoplasia. Whole exome testing was sent shortly after birth with a trio of the infant and parental samples. The infant died at day two of life from respiratory failure.
Methods
Exome library preparation, sequencing, bioinformatics, and data analysis were performed as previously described [4, 16–18]. Briefly, samples were prepared using IDT xGen Exome Research Panel V1.0 and sequenced using paired-end, 150-cycle chemistry on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Approximately 92% of characterized Mendelian disease genes are fully covered (100%) at > 20X (Farwell et al. [17]). The sequence data were aligned to the reference human genome (GRCh37) and variant calls were generated using CASAVA and Pindel [19]. Stepwise filtering included the removal of common SNPs, intergenic and 3’/5’ UTR variants, non-splice-related intronic variants, and lastly synonymous variants. Variants were then filtered further based on family history and possible inheritance models. Data are annotated with the Ambry Variant Analyzer tool (AVA) [20]. Identified candidate alterations were confirmed using automated fluorescence dideoxy sequencing.
Results
Exome sequencing of the family trio (proband, mother, and father) resulted in a mean fold-coverage of captured regions of 135.04x per sample, with >98% covered with at least 10x coverage, and an average mean quality score of 34.56. (Additional file 1: Table S1). Family history inheritance model filtering based on autosomal and X-linked dominant and recessive and Y-linked inheritance models of the proband, mother, and father revealed 24 unique alterations in 17 candidate genes. Manual review of each alteration to rule out sequencing artifacts and polymorphisms along with medical interpretation to rule out genes lacking clinical overlap with the patient's evaluated phenotype (Additional file 2: Table S2) resulted in 1 gene (1 unique alteration) being considered as a candidate (Additional file 3: Table S3). A hemizygous alteration with potential clinical relevance, maternally inherited (RBM10) c.1352_1353delAG (p.E451Vfs*66) (Chr X:47040717-47040718), was confirmed by using automated fluorescence dideoxy sequencing (Additional file 4: Figure S1). To our knowledge, the c.1352_1353delAG alteration has not been previously reported in dbSNP, the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) [21], the ExAC database [22] or the 1000 Genomes database. [10].The full length protein spans 930 residues and consists of six identified domains (Fig. 2). This alteration results in loss of over half of the native protein sequence, including the octamer repeat (OCRE) [23], C2H2-Zinc, and G-patch domains. These domains have been shown, by truncation and domain deletion in the closely related protein RBM5, to be important for spliceosome assembly and recruitment to pre-mRNA [24] In particular, it has been shown that the OCRE domain binds to the C-terminal tail of snRNP core proteins [25]. Therefore, this alteration is predicted to cause loss of function either through nonsense-mediated decay or loss of functionally important protein domains and is interpreted as a pathogenic mutation.
Fig. 2
Domain structure diagram of RBM10 showing locations of domains (grey rectangles) and sequence biased regions (grey squares). Position of alteration shown with teal arrow, native sequence lost due to this alteration outlined in red, and the alternative 66 amino acid C-terminal sequence gained is depicted as a teal line. No structure or function was identified for this gained sequence
Domain structure diagram of RBM10 showing locations of domains (grey rectangles) and sequence biased regions (grey squares). Position of alteration shown with teal arrow, native sequence lost due to this alteration outlined in red, and the alternative 66 amino acid C-terminal sequence gained is depicted as a teal line. No structure or function was identified for this gained sequence
Discussion and conclusions
Whole exome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of a male neonate of Mexican ancestry with multiple congenital anomalies was performed prior to his death at 2 days of age. Testing identified a maternally inherited hemizygous RBM10 mutation. While rapid exome testing would not have benefitted this particular case, it is possible that rapid testing could aid additional patients with RBM10 alterations in prognosis and knowledge to expand the clinical phenotype.While previous testing had failed to provide a diagnosis for the proband, exome sequencing was able to determine a cause post-mortem based on the features evident before his death. This unique case highlights the power of whole exome sequencing as a diagnostic tool even after the patient is deceased. Post-mortem discovery of the cause of this patient’s disease may help the parents with future reproductive decision making. The family has the option of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, early prenatal diagnosis in a future pregnancy, adoption, or to avoid future pregnancies. In addition, carrier testing is available for at-risk maternal relatives including three maternal aunts to our proband. When an infant is born with multiple anomalies, identifying a cause is essential for the family to determine recurrence risk in a future pregnancy.The RBM10 gene is located on chromosome Xp11.23 and encodes the RNA binding motif protein 10 (OMIM 300080), originally called RNA binding protein S1-1, which participates in alternative splicing of apoptosis-related genes [26, 27]. Hemizygous alterations in RBM10 cause the X-linked recessive disorderTARP (Talipes equinovarus, Atrial septal defect, Robin sequence, and Persistent left superior vena cava) syndrome. TARP syndrome is a disorder originally described by Gorlin et al. as lethal in males associated with talipes equinovarus, congenital heart defects, and Robin sequence (micrognathia, glossoptosis, and cleft palate) [28]. Additional findings reported in patients with pathogenic variants in RBM10 include dysmorphic features (hypertelorism, ear abnormalities, wide mouth with downturned corners, upturned nose, supraorbital ridges), airway abnormalities, high arched palate, cryptorchidism, oligohydramnios, intrauterine growth restriction, failure to thrive, rocker bottom feet, hypotonia, cranial nervous system abnormalities, postaxial pes polydactyly, cutaneous syndactyly, sensorineural hearing loss, developmental delay, and seizures [26, 28, 29].Our patient has the overlapping features of intrauterine growth restriction, complications of oligohydramnios, small size, cleft palate, pulmonary hypoplasia, a wide anterior fontanelle, cryptorchidism renal anomaly seen in other patients with TARP syndrome. His other features including multiple hemivertebrae, imperforate anus, aplasia of thumbs and first toes have not been reported in previous patients. While these additional features are present in other additional genetic conditions, due to the age of death, additional clinical diagnoses could not be made and a second pathogenic alteration was not found to explain these features.The majority of cases reported have resulted in pre- or post-natal male lethality with the exception of two reported patients, one alive at 20 months and one alive at age 3 years and 7 months [26, 29]. Gripp et al. postulated that neonatal lethality was due to cardiac conduction defects, a finding not seen in our patient. To date, there have been no symptoms reported in carrier females and pathogenic variants reported in RBM10 have been limited to loss of function alleles [26]. Therefore knowledge of the maternally inherited alteration may increase anxiety to due the recurrence risk, but can provide reassurance as additional health surveillance of the mother would not be necessary.Previous reported cases of TARP syndrome demonstrate significant variability in clinical phenotype. Here, we report an additional patient with a pathogenic RBM10 alteration demonstrating expansion of the clinical phenotype for this rare disorder. Diagnosis by DES is indispensable as the known phenotype of TARP expands and as limited time is often available to perform genetic testing in affected infants.Run Metrics for family trio. Read depth values exclude the following: reads of low quality, reads that do not align uniquely to the exome, and PCR duplicates. (DOCX 22 kb)Variant Filtering Based on Inheritance Model & Interpretation (DOCX 20 kb)List of candidate genes/alterations resulting from inheritance model filtering and the manual removal of NGS artifacts and polymorphisms*. (DOCX 18 kb)Pedigree and Co-segregation. Familial pedigree and electropherograms of the c.1352_1353delAG (p.E451Vfs*66) alteration in the proband and additional family members. Shaded shapes indicate affected individuals. Asterisk (*) indicates whole exome sequencing performed. (DOCX 210 kb)
Authors: Chandree L Beaulieu; Jacek Majewski; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Mark E Samuels; Bridget A Fernandez; Francois P Bernier; Michael Brudno; Bartha Knoppers; Janet Marcadier; David Dyment; Shelin Adam; Dennis E Bulman; Steve J M Jones; Denise Avard; Minh Thu Nguyen; Francois Rousseau; Christian Marshall; Richard F Wintle; Yaoqing Shen; Stephen W Scherer; Jan M Friedman; Jacques L Michaud; Kym M Boycott Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Jennifer J Johnston; Julie C Sapp; Cynthia Curry; Margaret Horton; Eyby Leon; Kristina Cusmano-Ozog; William B Dobyns; Louanne Hudgins; Elaine Zackai; Leslie G Biesecker Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Sarah E Soden; Carol J Saunders; Laurel K Willig; Emily G Farrow; Laurie D Smith; Josh E Petrikin; Jean-Baptiste LePichon; Neil A Miller; Isabelle Thiffault; Darrell L Dinwiddie; Greyson Twist; Aaron Noll; Bryce A Heese; Lee Zellmer; Andrea M Atherton; Ahmed T Abdelmoity; Nicole Safina; Sarah S Nyp; Britton Zuccarelli; Ingrid A Larson; Ann Modrcin; Suzanne Herd; Mitchell Creed; Zhaohui Ye; Xuan Yuan; Robert A Brodsky; Stephen F Kingsmore Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Stephanie K Gandomi; K D Farwell Gonzalez; M Parra; L Shahmirzadi; J Mancuso; P Pichurin; R Temme; S Dugan; W Zeng; Sha Tang Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Matthew N Bainbridge; Min Wang; Daniel L Burgess; Christie Kovar; Matthew J Rodesch; Mark D'Ascenzo; Jacob Kitzman; Yuan-Qing Wu; Irene Newsham; Todd A Richmond; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Donna Muzny; Thomas J Albert; Richard A Gibbs Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2010-06-17 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Keren J Carss; Sarah C Hillman; Vijaya Parthiban; Dominic J McMullan; Eamonn R Maher; Mark D Kilby; Matthew E Hurles Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Michelle M Clark; Amber Hildreth; Sergey Batalov; Yan Ding; Shimul Chowdhury; Kelly Watkins; Katarzyna Ellsworth; Brandon Camp; Cyrielle I Kint; Calum Yacoubian; Lauge Farnaes; Matthew N Bainbridge; Curtis Beebe; Joshua J A Braun; Margaret Bray; Jeanne Carroll; Julie A Cakici; Sara A Caylor; Christina Clarke; Mitchell P Creed; Jennifer Friedman; Alison Frith; Richard Gain; Mary Gaughran; Shauna George; Sheldon Gilmer; Joseph Gleeson; Jeremy Gore; Haiying Grunenwald; Raymond L Hovey; Marie L Janes; Kejia Lin; Paul D McDonagh; Kyle McBride; Patrick Mulrooney; Shareef Nahas; Daeheon Oh; Albert Oriol; Laura Puckett; Zia Rady; Martin G Reese; Julie Ryu; Lisa Salz; Erica Sanford; Lawrence Stewart; Nathaly Sweeney; Mari Tokita; Luca Van Der Kraan; Sarah White; Kristen Wigby; Brett Williams; Terence Wong; Meredith S Wright; Catherine Yamada; Peter Schols; John Reynders; Kevin Hall; David Dimmock; Narayanan Veeraraghavan; Thomas Defay; Stephen F Kingsmore Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 19.319
Authors: Allan T Højland; Ihab Lolas; Henrik Okkels; Charlotte K Lautrup; Birgitte R Diness; Michael B Petersen; Irene K Nielsen Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Hadley Stevens Smith; J Michael Swint; Seema R Lalani; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Marcia C de Oliveira Otto; Stephan Castellanos; Amy Taylor; Brendan H Lee; Heidi V Russell Journal: Genet Med Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 8.822