Marian Tzuang1, Jocelynn T Owusu1, Adam P Spira1,2, Marilyn S Albert3, George W Rebok1,2. 1. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
Purpose of the Study: Interest in cognitive training for healthy older adults to reduce cognitive decline has grown considerably over the past few decades. Given the shift toward a more diverse society, the purpose of this review is to examine the extent of race/ethnic minority participation in cognitive training studies and characteristics of studies that included race/ethnic minority participants. Design and Methods: This review considered peer-reviewed studies reporting cognitive training studies for cognitively healthy, community-dwelling older adults (age 55+) in the United States published in English before December 31, 2015. A total of 31 articles published between 1986 and 2015 meeting inclusion criteria were identified and included in the review. Results: A total of 6,432 participants were recruited across all of the studies, and ranged in age from 55 to 99 years. Across all studies examined, 39% reported racial/ethnic background information. Only 3 of these studies included a substantial number of minorities (26.7% in the ACTIVE study; 28.4% in the SeniorWISE study; 22.7% in the TEAM study). Race/ethnic minority older adults were disproportionately underrepresented in cognitive training studies. Implications: Further research should aim to enroll participants representative of various race/ethnic minority populations. Strategies for recruitment and retention of ethnic minority participants in cognitive training research are discussed, which could lead to the development of more culturally appropriate and perhaps more effective cognitive interventions.
Purpose of the Study: Interest in cognitive training for healthy older adults to reduce cognitive decline has grown considerably over the past few decades. Given the shift toward a more diverse society, the purpose of this review is to examine the extent of race/ethnic minority participation in cognitive training studies and characteristics of studies that included race/ethnic minority participants. Design and Methods: This review considered peer-reviewed studies reporting cognitive training studies for cognitively healthy, community-dwelling older adults (age 55+) in the United States published in English before December 31, 2015. A total of 31 articles published between 1986 and 2015 meeting inclusion criteria were identified and included in the review. Results: A total of 6,432 participants were recruited across all of the studies, and ranged in age from 55 to 99 years. Across all studies examined, 39% reported racial/ethnic background information. Only 3 of these studies included a substantial number of minorities (26.7% in the ACTIVE study; 28.4% in the SeniorWISE study; 22.7% in the TEAM study). Race/ethnic minority older adults were disproportionately underrepresented in cognitive training studies. Implications: Further research should aim to enroll participants representative of various race/ethnic minority populations. Strategies for recruitment and retention of ethnic minority participants in cognitive training research are discussed, which could lead to the development of more culturally appropriate and perhaps more effective cognitive interventions.
Authors: Christopher M Clark; Charles DeCarli; Dan Mungas; Helena I Chui; Roger Higdon; Jessica Nuñez; Henrique Fernandez; Mirna Negrón; Jennifer Manly; Steven Ferris; Angelica Perez; Migdalia Torres; Douglas Ewbank; Guila Glosser; Gerald van Belle Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2005-05
Authors: Alden L Gross; Jeanine M Parisi; Adam P Spira; Alexandra M Kueider; Jean Y Ko; Jane S Saczynski; Quincy M Samus; George W Rebok Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2012 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Forrest Scogin; J Kaci Fairchild; Adriana Yon; Douglas L Welsh; Andrew Presnell Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Jennifer L Mozolic; Ashley B Long; Ashley R Morgan; Melissa Rawley-Payne; Paul J Laurienti Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2009-05-09 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Maren Strenziok; Raja Parasuraman; Ellen Clarke; Dean S Cisler; James C Thompson; Pamela M Greenwood Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jong-Sung Yoon; Nelson A Roque; Ronald Andringa; Erin R Harrell; Katharine G Lewis; Thomas Vitale; Neil Charness; Walter R Boot Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Raina L Croff; Phelps Witter Iv; Miya L Walker; Edline Francois; Charlie Quinn; Thomas C Riley; Nicole F Sharma; Jeffrey A Kaye Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2019-01-09