Literature DB >> 28575064

Antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae stool isolates circulating in Kenya.

Chris Rowe Taitt1, Tomasz A Leski1, Daniel P Erwin2, Elizabeth A Odundo3, Nancy C Kipkemoi3, Janet N Ndonye3, Ronald K Kirera3, Abigael N Ombogo3, Judd L Walson4,5, Patricia B Pavlinac4, Christine Hulseberg2, Gary J Vora1.   

Abstract

We sought to determine the genetic and phenotypic antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles of commensal Klebsiella spp. circulating in Kenya by testing human stool isolates of 87 K. pneumoniae and three K. oxytoca collected at eight locations. Over one-third of the isolates were resistant to ≥3 categories of antimicrobials and were considered multidrug-resistant (MDR). We then compared the resistance phenotype to the presence/absence of 238 AMR genes determined by a broad-spectrum microarray and PCR. Forty-six genes/gene families were identified conferring resistance to β-lactams (ampC/blaDHA, blaCMY/LAT, blaLEN-1, blaOKP-A/OKP-B1, blaOXA-1-like family, blaOXY-1, blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1 and blaCTX-M-2 families), aminoglycosides (aac(3)-III, aac(6)-Ib, aad(A1/A2), aad(A4), aph(AI), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B), and rmtB), macrolides (mac(A), mac(B), mph(A)/mph(K)), tetracyclines (tet(A), tet(B), tet(D), tet(G)), ansamycins (arr), phenicols (catA1/cat4, floR, cmlA, cmr), fluoroquinolones (qnrS), quaternary amines (qacEΔ1), streptothricin (sat2), sulfonamides (sul1, sul2, sul3), and diaminopyrimidines (dfrA1, dfrA5, dfrA7, dfrA8, dfrA12, dfrA13/21/22/23 family, dfrA14, dfrA15, dfrA16, dfrA17). This is the first profile of genes conferring resistance to multiple categories of antimicrobial agents in western and central Kenya. The large number and wide variety of resistance genes detected suggest the presence of significant selective pressure. The presence of five or more resistance determinants in almost two-thirds of the isolates points to the need for more effective, targeted public health policies and infection control/prevention measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28575064      PMCID: PMC5456380          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is of significant concern in developing nations due to over-use of antimicrobial agents, widespread availability of counterfeit or substandard drugs, and poor infection control measures [1,2]. The scarcity of reliable and timely information, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, may further limit epidemiological surveillance and effective stewardship efforts. While only infrequently associated with diarrheal disease, Klebsiella pneumoniae and other klebsiellae are common intestinal commensals with significant potential to cause extraintestinal infections in severely ill patients and diarrhea in HIV/AIDS patients [3,4,5,6,7]. Of additional concern, Klebsiella spp. acquire, accumulate, and transfer myriad AMR determinants and therefore may represent a significant reservoir for resistance within the gut [8,9,10] and may increase the risk of resistant infections in hospital environments [5,11]. Indeed, in vivo transfer of AMR genes from intestinal klebsiellae to other bacterial species has been well documented [12,13,14,15,16]. Here, we use intestinal Klebsiella isolates collected at eight medical treatment facilities in western and central Kenya to interrogate the gut resistome and its potential for rapid evolution and spread.

Materials and methods

Sample collection, processing, antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Stool specimens or rectal swabs were collected into sterile, wide-mouth collection cups and aliquoted into thirds (Cary-Blair transport media, 10% formalin for parasitology, and a vial for freezing at -20C for virology) upon enrollment; previous studies showed no differences in frequency of bacterial isolation between stool samples and rectal swabs [17]. Samples were stripped of all identifiers and were assigned accession numbers before transportation to the WRAIR Microbiology Hub laboratory in Kericho (MHK) within 72 hours of collection. Samples were then plated on primary, selective, and differential media. MacConkey, MacConkey-sorbitol, sheep blood agar, Hektoen enteric agar, thiosulfate-citrate-bile-sucrose agar, cefoperazone-vancomycin-amphotericin agar, and cefsulodin-irgasan-novobiocin agar were the primary media; no specific enrichment step was performed as part of the normal workup. At 24 and 48 hours, colonies were subcultured, Gram stained, and subjected to biochemical testing (indole production, Voges-Proskauer reaction, o-nitrophenyl-Δ-D-galactopyrandoside production) before analysis on Microflex MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Millerica, MA, USA) and MicroScan WalkAway40 (Siemens Healthcare, Sacramento, CA, USA) systems for identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), respectively. MIC 44 and NC 66 panels were used with LabPro software updated for 2015 CLSI breakpoints [18] and automated interpretation of results. Laboratory personnel performing susceptibility testing were enrolled in External Quality Assurance/Proficiency Testing for both College of American Pathologists (three cycles/year) and United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service (monthly). Weekly quality control for AST was performed using recommended ATCC strains [18].

Study sites

Samples were collected from eight Kenyan clinical sites participating in the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR), University of Washington/Kenya Institute of Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) collaborative research group enteric surveillance programs. These surveillance sites serve diverse communities: Mbagathi District Hospital serves a highly urban population near the center of Nairobi. The Eldoret-based clinic at Moi Barracks (MBB1) serves military service members and their families in the Kenyan highlands. Kericho District Hospital, also located in the highlands, serves a relatively rural community of tea pluckers and farmers. Kombewa is similarly considered rural. The remaining sites at the district hospitals of Kisumu, Kisii, Migori, and Homa Bay are located in western Kenya near Lake Victoria and serve both urban and rural populations largely subsistent upon agricultural and fishing economies.

Eligibility criteria

Protocol-trained clinical staff at all sites recruited subjects experiencing acute diarrhea (three or more loose stools within a 24 hour period). The cases were recruited only from outpatient populations, and none were admitted to the hospital. Age-matched asymptomatic controls were recruited from the same sites if the subjects had not experienced acute diarrhea within the previous two week period; when possible, controls were healthy siblings close in age to the index case. Participants experiencing (chronic) diarrhea lasting more than 14 days were excluded. Medical histories were captured for a small subset of samples (n = 13). Both cases and controls provided basic clinical, epidemiological (water source and treatment) and demographic (age, gender, residence) information. Enrollment of all subjects required informed consent and custodial assent for subjects under 18 years of age. No diagnostic or therapeutic decisions were based on any phenotypic or genotypic data generated for this study. Work performed on this study was approved by the KEMRI and WRAIR Institutional Review Boards under KEMRI SSC #1549/WRAIR #1549 and KEMRI SSC #2056/WRAIR #1811.

Detection of resistance determinants

The presence/absence of 238 different AMR genes was determined using the Antimicrobial Resistance Determinant Microarray (ARDM) v.2 as previously described [19,20]. Briefly, this microarray was designed for detection of >200 determinants derived from both Gram-positive and–negative bacteria. Chip content covers genes conferring resistance to 15 categories of antimicrobials (β-lactams, aminoglycosides, macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins, quaternary amines, ansamycins, diaminopyrimidines, antimicrobial peptides, tetracyclines, phenicols, glycopeptides, platensemycin, fluoroquinolones, sulfonamides); several plasmid-borne multidrug efflux pumps are also represented on the chip. Full chip content information is given in [19]. Following sample processing, hybridization, and washing, the signal associated with each probe was determined electrochemically. An AMR gene was identified as detected when > 50% of its representative probes had signals above the mean signal from the lowest 2,128 probes + 3 standard deviations or when >70% of its probes had signals above either of two less stringent thresholds [20,21]. A limited set of detected AMR and integrase genes were confirmed by PCR and DNA amplicon sequencing (S1 Table).

Statistical analysis

Statistical comparisons between populations were performed using two-tailed student's t-tests (assuming unequal variance). Chi-square tests were used to compare binomial proportions in independent samples (2 × n contingency tables). Linear regression was used to compare the number of genes/isolate with age (Ho: slope = 0, tested by student's t-test).

Results

Sample set characteristics

A total of 90 Klebsiella spp. strains were isolated from participants ranging in age from 4 months to 54 years (median age 57 months). Half of the subjects presented with acute diarrheal illness and half were healthy controls. The majority of isolates came from the Kisii and Kisumu sites (37 [41.1%] and 16 [17.8%] isolates, respectively) (Table 1). Thirty-three of the isolates (36.7%) were non-susceptible to at least three categories of antimicrobials and were considered multidrug resistant (MDR) per Magiorakos [22]. One isolate, MHK02590, was considered extensively drug-resistant (non-susceptible to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories; Table 2) [22]. As a whole, there were no differences between overall MDR phenotypes (P = 0.940) in the strains isolated from subjects with ADI and asymptomatic controls, nor between genders (P = 0.463). Between 80 and 90% of the tested isolates were susceptible to all β-lactams except ampicillin, to one or more aminoglycosides, and to both of the fluoroquinolones tested. Over half were susceptible to tetracycline, but more than 60% were resistant to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT).
Table 1

Summary of antimicrobial phenotypic susceptibility for diarrheal and control isolates.

Antimicrobial compoundaPhenotypeCase (n = 45)Control (n = 45)Overall (n = 90)
AMCR11 (24%)7 (16%)18 (20%)
I8 (18%)5 (11%)13 (14%)
S26 (58%)33 (73%)59 (66%)
SAMR18 (40%)14 (31%)32 (36%)
I4 (9%)3 (7%)7 (8%)
S23 (51%)28 (62%)51 (57%)
ATMR4 (9%)4 (9%)8 (9%)
I1 (2%)-1 (1%)
S40 (89%)41 (91%)81 (91%)
FEPR6 (13%)3 (7%)9 (10%)
I---
S39 (87%)42 (93%)81 (90%)
CAZR1 (2%)1 (2%)2 (2%)
R (ESBL)4 (9%)2 (4%)6 (7%)
I1 (2%)-1 (1%)
S39 (87%)42 (93%)81 (90%)
CTXR1 (2%)1 (2%)2 (2%)
R (ESBL)4 (9%)2 (4%)6 (7%)
I2 (4%)-2 (2%)
S3842 (93%)80 (89%)
IPMR1 (2%)-1 (1%)
I-3 (7%)3 (3%)
S44 (98%)42 (93%)86 (96%)
MEMR-1 (2%)1 (1%)
I1 (2%)-1 (1%)
S44 (98%)44 (98%)88 (98%)
AMKR1 (2%)1 (2%)2 (2%)
I---
S44 (98%)44 (98%)88 (98%)
GENR3 (7%)4 (9%)7 (8%)
I1 (2%)1 (2%)2 (2%)
S41 (91%)40 (89%)81 (90%)
TOBR3 (7%)2 (4%)5 (6%)
I-2 (4%)2 (2%)
S42 (93%)41 (91%)83 (92%)
TETR18 (40%)15 (33%)33 (37%)
I5 (11%)3 (7%)8 (9%)
S22 (449%)27 (60%)49 (54%)
CIPR1 (2%)-1 (1%)
I1 (2%)-1 (1%)
S43 (96%)45 (100%)88 (98%)
LVXR2 (4%)-2 (2%)
I-1 (2%)1 (1%)
S43 (96%)44 (98%)87 (97%)
SXTR25 (56%)30 (67%)55 (61%)
I---
S20 (44%)15 (33%)35 (39%)

aAntimicrobial compounds are grouped together according to categories used to define MDR per Magiorakos [22]. AMC–amoxicillin/clavulanate; SAM–ampicillin/sulbactam; ATM–aztreonam; FEP–cefepime; CAZ–ceftazidime; CTX–cefotaxime; IMP–imipenem; MEM–meropenem; AMK–amikacin; GEN–gentamicin; TOB–tobramycin; TET–tetracycline; CIP–ciprofloxacin; LVX–levofloxacin; SXT–trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; S–sensitive; I–intermediate; R–resistant. ESBL–Extended-spectrum β-lactamase

Table 2

Metadata and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility for individual isolates.

Strain no.agedate isolatedsitebAntimicrobial compoundaCtrl/Csc
genderAMCSAMATMFEPCAZCTXIPMMEMAMKGENTOBTETCIPLVXSXT
MHK0050411mF7/10/2010KuRRSSSSISSSSRSSRctrl
MHK0130518yr 6mM5/24/2011KiSRSSSSSSSSSRSSRcs
MHK014193yr 2mF6/21/2011KiSRSSSSSSSRIRSSRctrl
MHK018149mM9/28/2011MbRRSSISRSSSSRSSRcs
MHK02123d21yrF1/11/2012KiSISSSSSSSSSRSSRctrl
MHK02126d1yrM1/11/2012KiSSSSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
MHK0217821yrM1/21/2012KiRRSSSSISSSSRSSRctrl
MHK023032yr 1mF2/11/2012KiRRSSSSSSSRIRSSRctrl
MHK024991yr 3mM3/29/2012KiIRRRESBLESBLSSSISSSSRctrl
MHK025906mM4/14/2012MbRRRRRRSSRRRRRRRcs
MHK0263154yrF4/20/2012KiSSSSSSSSSSSRSSRctrl
MHK026781yr 10mF5/1/2012KiSSSSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
MHK026909mM5/4/2012MbRRSSSSSSSSSISSRcs
MHK027804mF5/29/2012KiSSSSSSSSSSSRSSScs
MHK030268yrF7/13/2012KuIRSSSSSSSSSRSSRcs
MHK0421211mM11/15/2013M1RSSSSSSSSSSSSSRcs
MHK046175mM11/16/2013MbIRSSSSSSSSSSSSRcs
MHK046228mM11/20/2013KiSSSSSSSSSSSSSSScs
MHK047752yr 1mF2/1/2014KuSSSSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
MHK047762yr 6mF2/1/2014KuIRSSSSSSSSSSSSRcs
MHK0477751yrM2/1/2014KoSRSSSSSSSSSRSSRctrl
MHK047792yr 3mM2/4/2014KeSSSSSSSSSSSSSSScs
MHK047864yrM2/5/2014KiIISSSSSSSSSRSSRcs
MHK0479243yrM2/5/2014KeSSSSSSSSSSSRSSSctrl
MHK048043yr 9mF2/7/2014KiSRSSSSSSSSSRSSRctrl
MHK048123yrM3/27/2014KeRRSRESBLESBLSSSSSSSSRcs
MHK048131yr 2mM3/28/2014KuIRSSSSSSSSSSSSRcs
MHK048191yr 4mM4/1/2014KuSSSSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
MHK048212yr 3mF4/2/2014KeSSSSSSSSSSSSSSScs
MHK048222yr 11mM4/3/2014KiSRSSSSSSSSSRSSRctrl
MHK0483419yrM4/9/2014KoSSSSSSSSSSSISSSctrl
MHK048384yrF4/10/2014KuSSSSSSSSSSSSSSScs
MHK0484728yrF4/11/2014KoSSSSSSSSSSSRSSScs
MHK0486432yrF4/17/2014KiSSSSSSSSSSSISSSctrl
MHK0487222yrF4/18/2014KuIRSSSSSSSSSRSSRcs
MHK048852yr 5mM4/24/2014KeSSSSSSSSSSSRSSRcs
MHK049003yr 5mF4/28/2014KeSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSctrl
MHK0490422yrF4/29/2014KiSISSSSSSSISSSSRcs
MHK049081yr 3mM4/30/2014KuSRSSSSSSSSSRSSRcs
MHK049193yrM5/6/2014KiIRSSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
MHK049223yrF5/7/2014KiRRRRRRISRRRSSIRctrl
MHK0492324yrM5/7/2014KiSSSSSSSRSSSSSSRctrl
MHK0492631yrF5/7/2014KuSSSSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
MHK049285yrF5/9/2014KiSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSctrl
MHK0493028yrM5/9/2014M1RRRRESBLESBLSSSRRSSSRctrl
MHK049411yr 8mM5/14/2014M1RSSSSSSSSSSRSSRctrl
MHK0494328yrF5/15/2014KiSSSSSSSSSSSSSSScs
MHK0494617yrF5/16/2014KiSSSSSSSSSSSSSSScs
MHK0494736yrF5/16/2014KoRRSSSSSSSSSISSRcs
MHK0494838yrM5/16/2014KoSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSctrl
MHK0495737yrF5/17/2014M1SSSSSISSSSSISSScs
MHK049608mM5/20/2014KiSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSctrl
MHK0496715yrM5/22/2014M1IISSSSSSSSSRSSRctrl
MHK0498030yrM5/23/2014M1IISSSSSSSSSRSSRcs
MHK049831yr 1mM5/24/2014KuIRSSSSSSSSSRSSRctrl
MHK049846mM5/24/2014KuSSSSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
MHK050108yrF5/31/2014KiIRRSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
MHK05013a35yrF5/31/2014M1SSSSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
MHK05013b35yrF5/31/2014M1SSSSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
MHK05014a32yrM5/31/2014M1SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSctrl
MHK05014bd32yrM5/31/2014M1SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSctrl
MHK0501752yrF6/5/2014KoSSSSSSSSSSSSSSRcs
MHK0501832yrM6/5/2014M1SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSctrl
MHK05018-1b32yrM6/5/2014M1SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSctrl
MHK050217yrM6/5/2014KiSRSSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
MHK050277yrM6/6/2014KiRRSSSSSSSSSRSSRcs
MHK050285yrF6/6/2014KiSSSSSSSSSSSRSSRcs
MHK050422yr 9mM6/11/2014KiRISSSSSSSSSRSSRctrl
MHK050464yr 10mM6/12/2014KiSSSSSISSSSSSSSScs
MHK050686yrM6/20/2014KiRRRRESBLESBLSSSRRSISRcs
MHK050701yrF6/21/2014KuSSSSSSSSSSSRSSRctrl
MHK050724yr 6mF6/21/2014KiSSSSSSSSSSSSSSScs
MHK050809yrM6/27/2015KiSSSSSSSSSSSISSScs
MHK050845yrF6/28/2014KuRISSSSSSSSSRSSScs
MHK050904yr 6mM7/2/2014KuSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSctrl
MHK050915yr 10mM7/2/2014KuRRRRESBLESBLSSSSSRSSRcs
MHK0509423yrF7/4/2014KiSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSctrl
NTS016974yr 1mM6/12/2014KiRRRRESBLESBLSISRRSSRRcs
NTS016995yr 5mM6/12/2014MgSSSSSSSSSSSISSScs
NTS017032yr 8mF6/13/2014HySSSSSSSSSSSRSSRcs
NTS017057mF6/13/2014HySRSRSSSSSSSSSSRcs
NTS017074yr 9mF6/13/2014MgSSSSSSSSSSSRSSSctrl
NTS017082yr 9mM6/14/2014KiSSSSSSSSSSSSSSScs
NTS017322yr 10mF6/25/2014HySSSSSSSSSSSSSSScs
NTS0174511mF7/2/2014KiSSSSSSSSSSSSSSScs
NTS017475yrM7/3/2014HySSSSSSSSSSSSSSRctrl
NTS017494yr 3mM7/3/2014MgSSSSSSSSSSSISSScs
NTS017553yr 1mF7/5/2014KiIRSSSSSSSSSRSSRcs
NTS017933yr 2mM8/2/2014HySSISSSSSSSSSSSScs
NTS019365yr 6mM6/26/2014MgSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSctrl

aAntimicrobial compounds are grouped together according to categories used to define MDR per Magiorakos [22]. AMC–amoxicillin/clavulanate; SAM–ampicillin/sulbactam; ATM–aztreonam; FEP–cefepime; CAZ–ceftazidime; CTX–cefotaxime; IMP–imipenem; MEM–meropenem; AMK–amikacin; GEN–gentamicin; TOB–tobramycin; TET–tetracycline; CIP–ciprofloxacin; LVX–levofloxacin; SXT–trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; S–sensitive; I–intermediate; R–resistant. ESBL–Extended-spectrum β-lactamase

bCollection site: Hy–Homabay; Ke–Kericho; Ki–Kisii; Ko–Kombewa; Ku–Kisumu; Mb–Mbagathi; Mg–Migori; M1 –Moi Barracks at Eldoret

cctrl–healthy control; cs–case of acute diarrheal illness

dK. oxytoca

aAntimicrobial compounds are grouped together according to categories used to define MDR per Magiorakos [22]. AMC–amoxicillin/clavulanate; SAM–ampicillin/sulbactam; ATM–aztreonam; FEP–cefepime; CAZ–ceftazidime; CTX–cefotaxime; IMP–imipenem; MEM–meropenem; AMK–amikacin; GEN–gentamicin; TOBtobramycin; TETtetracycline; CIPciprofloxacin; LVX–levofloxacin; SXTtrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; S–sensitive; I–intermediate; R–resistant. ESBL–Extended-spectrum β-lactamase aAntimicrobial compounds are grouped together according to categories used to define MDR per Magiorakos [22]. AMC–amoxicillin/clavulanate; SAM–ampicillin/sulbactam; ATM–aztreonam; FEP–cefepime; CAZ–ceftazidime; CTX–cefotaxime; IMP–imipenem; MEM–meropenem; AMK–amikacin; GEN–gentamicin; TOBtobramycin; TETtetracycline; CIPciprofloxacin; LVX–levofloxacin; SXTtrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; S–sensitive; I–intermediate; R–resistant. ESBL–Extended-spectrum β-lactamase bCollection site: Hy–Homabay; Ke–Kericho; Ki–Kisii; Ko–Kombewa; Ku–Kisumu; Mb–Mbagathi; Mg–Migori; M1 –Moi Barracks at Eldoret cctrl–healthy control; cs–case of acute diarrheal illness dK. oxytoca A total of 46 AMR genes or gene families covering 11 categories of antimicrobials were identified amongst the 90 isolates using a broad-range microarray (Table 3). PCR was used to verify the presence of a select group of genes detected by microarray, as well as ancillary genes associated with specific combinations of AMR determinants (S1 Table). All but six isolates harbored multiple resistance determinants (Table 4). While there were no differences in MDR phenotype between age quartiles (P = 0.336), a small but significant inverse relationship was observed between the total number of genes per isolate and age (P = 0.029; t-test of linear regression), with isolates from younger subjects harboring a larger number of genes. No significant differences in genes/isolate were observed between diarrheal and control isolates (P = 0.458) or between genders (P = 0.184). The disparate numbers of isolates collected at the various sites (n = 4 to n = 37) precluded any statistically valid site-to-site comparisons. However, sites with highest percentages of MDR phenotype, Mbagathi (3 of 4 isolates) and Kisii (17 of 37 isolates), also harbored the widest overall varieties of resistance determinants (28 and 41 determinants, respectively).
Table 3

Summary of AMR genes in the tested population.

genecase (n = 45)control (n = 45)overall (n = 90)
β-lactams
ampC/blaDHA0 (0%)1 (2%)1 (1%)
blaCMY/LAT family1 (2%)0 (0%)1 (1%)
blaLEN-132 (71%)29 (64%)61 (68%)
blaOKP-A/OKP-B15 (11%)5 (11%)10 (11%)
blaOXA-13 (7%)0 (0%)3 (3%)
blaOXY-10 (0%)4 (9%)4 (4%)
blaSHV family43 (95%)35 (77%)78 (87%)
blaTEM family29 (64%)23 (51%)52 (58%)
blaCTX-M-1 family5 (11%)3 (7%)8 (9%)
blaCTX-M-2 family1 (2%)0 (0%)1 (1%)
aminoglycosides
aac(3)-III3 (7%)2 (4%)5 (6%)
aac(6)-Ib3 (7%)1 (2%)4 (4%)
aad(A1/A2) family10 (22%)8 (18%)18 (20%)
aad(A4)1 (2%)0 (0%)1 (1%)
aph(AI)3 (7%)4 (9%)7 (8%)
aph3/str(A)23 (51%)21 (47%)44 (49%)
aph6/str(B)25 (56%)22 (49%)47 (52%)
rmtB0 (0%)1 (2%)1 (1%)
macrolides
mac(A)16 (39%)13 (29%)29 (32%)
mac(B)13 (29%)12 (27%)25 (28%)
mph(A)/mph(K) family4 (9%)2 (4%)6 (7%)
tetracyclines
tet(A)7 (16%)9 (20%)16 (18%)
tet(B)4 (9%)5 (11%)9 (10%)
tet(D)6 (13%)5 (11%)11 (12%)
tet(G)0 (0%)1 (2%)1 (1%)
ansamycins
arr1 (2%)1 (2%)2 (2%)
phenicols
catA1/cat4 family7 (16%)2 (4%)7 (8%)
floR1 (2%)0 (0%)1 (1%)
cmlA1 (2%)0 (0%)1 (1%)
cmr6 (13%)14 (31%)32 (36%)
fluoroquinolones
qnrS2 (4%)0 (0%)2 (2%)
quaternary amines
qacEΔ117 (38%)11 (24%)28 (31%)
streptothricin
sat22 (4%)2 (4%)4 (4%)
sulfonamides
sul117 (38%)11 (24%)28 (31%)
sul225 (56%)22 (49%)
sul31 (2%)0 (0%)1 (1%)
diaminopyrimidines
dfrA16 (13%)3 (7%)9 (10%)
dfrA121 (2%)2 (4%)3 (3%)
dfrA13/21/22/23 family1 (2%)0 (0%)1 (1%)
dfrA148 (18%)10 (22%)18 (20%)
dfrA152 (4%)1 (2%)3 (3%)
dfrA160 (0%)2 (4%)2 (2%)
dfrA171 (2%)0 (0%)1 (1%)
dfrA53 (7%)4 (9%)7 (8%)
dfrA74 (9%)1 (2%)5 (6%)
dfrA83 (7%)2 (4%)5 (6%)
Table 4

AMR genes present in individual Kenyan Klebsiella spp. isolates.

strain no.Resistance determinant(s)
β-LactamsAminoglycosidesMacrolidesTetra-cyclinesAnsa-mysinPhenicolQuino-lonesQuaternary amines, strepto-thricinSulfon-amideDiamino-pyrimidine
MHK00504blaLEN, blaSHV,‡ blaTEMaad(A1/A2), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(B)cmrsat2sul2dfrA1
MHK01305blaOXA-1-like, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1 family, (blaSHV)aac(6)-Ib, aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(B)arrcatA1/cat4, cmrqacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA14
MHK01419blaTEM, (blaSHV)aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A)tet(B)sul2dfrA8
MHK01814blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(D)cmrqacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA14, dfrA7
MHK02123blaOXY-1aph(AI)cmr
MHK02126blaOXY-1aph(AI)
MHK02178aad(A1/A2), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(A)cmrsat2sul2dfrA14
MHK02303blaLEN, blaSHVmac(A), mac(B)cmr
MHK02499blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1 familyaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(A)cmrsul2
MHK02590blaLEN, blaOXA-1-like, blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1 familyaac(3)-III, aac(6)-Ib, aad(A1/A2), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B), mph(A)/mph(K)tet(A)catA1/cat4, cmlA, cmrsul2, sul3dfrA12, dfrA14
MHK02631blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)cmrsul2dfrA14
MHK02678blaTEM, (blaSHV)aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(B)cmrsul2dfrA8
MHK02690blaTEM, (blaSHV)aad(A1/A2), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(D)cmrqacEΔ1, sat2sul1, sul2dfrA1
MHK02780blaSHVmac(A), mac(B)cmr
MHK03026blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaad(A4), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)tet(D)catA1/cat4sul2dfrA13/21/22/23 family
MHK04212blaLEN, (blaSHV)aph(AI)cmr
MHK04617blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMqacEΔ1sul1dfrA5
MHK04622blaLEN, blaSHV
MHK04775blaLEN, blaSHVaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)sul2dfrA14
MHK04776blaLEN, blaSHVaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)qacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA7
MHK04777blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)tet(D)qacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA5
MHK04779blaLEN, blaSHV
MHK04786blaLEN, blaOKP-A/-B, (blaSHV), blaTEM
MHK04792blaLEN, blaOKP-A/-B, blaSHV, blaTEMaph6/str(B)
MHK04804blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)tet(D)qacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA5
MHK04812blaCMY/LAT, blaLEN, blaTEM, (blaSHV)aad(A1/A2), aph(AI), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)cmrqacEΔ1sul1, sul2
MHK04813blaTEM, (blaSHV)aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)cmrsul2dfrA8
MHK04819blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaad(A1/A2)tet(D)qacEΔ1sul2dfrA16, dfrA5
MHK04821(blaSHV)qacEΔ1sul1
MHK04822blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph(AI), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)tet(D)sul1, sul2dfrA14
MHK04834blaSHV
MHK04838blaLEN, blaOKP-A/-B, blaSHV, blaTEM
MHK04847blaLEN, blaOKP-A/-B, blaSHV, blaTEMcmr
MHK04864blaLEN, (blaSHV)
MHK04872blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMtet(D)qacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA5
MHK04885blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaad(A1/A2)tet(A)qacEΔ1sul1dfrA1
MHK04900blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMmac(A), mac(B)cmr
MHK04904blaLEN, blaSHV
MHK04908blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMtet(D)qacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA5
MHK04919blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)cmrsul2dfrA14
MHK04922ampC/blaDHA, blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1 familyaac(3)-III, aac(6)-Ib, aph(AI), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B), rmtB,tet(A), tet(G)arrqacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA12
MHK04923blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEM
MHK04926blaLEN, blaSHV
MHK04928blaLEN, blaSHV
MHK04930blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1 familyaac(3)-III, aad(A1/A2)qacEΔ1sul1dfrA12
MHK04941blaSHVaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)tet(A)sul2dfrA14
MHK04943blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEM
MHK04946blaLEN
MHK04947blaTEM, (blaSHV)aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mph(A)/mph(K)cmrsul2
MHK04948blaLEN, blaSHV
MHK04957blaSHV
MHK04960blaLEN, blaSHV
MHK04967blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)tet(A)catA1/cat4qacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA7
MHK04980blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mph(A)/mph(K)sul2dfrA14
MHK04983blaOKP-A/-B, blaTEMaad(A1/A2)tet(A)qacEΔ1sul1dfrA16
MHK04984blaSHVaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)sul2dfrA14
MHK05010blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B) mph(A)/mph(K)tet(B)catA1/cat4, cmrsul2dfrA14
MHK05013ablaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mph(A)/mph(K)sul2dfrA14
MHK05013bblaLEN, blaOKP-A/-B, (blaSHV), blaTEMaad(A1/A2)qacEΔ1sul1dfrA15
MHK05014ablaOXY-1
MHK05014bblaOXY-1, blaTEM
MHK05017blaLEN, blaSHVaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)tet(A)sul2
MHK05018blaLENcmr
MHK05018-1BblaLEN, blaSHVmac(A), mac(B)cmrsul2
MHK05021blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaad(A1/A2), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(A)cmrqacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA1
MHK05027blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(A), tet(B)cmrsul2dfrA14
MHK05028blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaad(A1/A2), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)tet(A)qacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA1
MHK05042blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)tet(A), tet(D)qacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA5
MHK05046blaSHVaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)
MHK05068blaLEN, blaOXA-1-like, (blaSHV), blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1 familyaac(3)-III, aac(6)-Ib family, aph(AI), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mph(A)/mph(K)qnrSqacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA15, dfrA17
MHK05070blaOKP-A/-Baad(A1/A2)tet(A)qacEΔ1sul1dfrA1
MHK05072blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaad(A1/A2), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(B)cmrqnrSqacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA1, dfrA14
MHK05080blaLEN, blaSHV
MHK05084blaOKP-A/-B, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(B)cmrsul2dfrA8
MHK05090blaOKP-A/-Baph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)
MHK05091blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1 familyaad(A1/A2), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(A)catA1/cat4 floR, cmrqacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA14, dfrA15
MHK05094blaLEN, (blaSHV)
NTS01697blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1 familyaac(3)-III, aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)sul2dfrA14
NTS01699blaLEN, blaSHV
NTS01703blaSHVaad(A1/A2)sat2dfrA1
NTS01705blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A)catA1/cat4 cmrqacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA7
NTS01707blaLEN, blaSHV
NTS01708blaLEN, blaOKP-A/-B, blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-2 family
NTS01732blaLEN, blaSHVaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)sul2
NTS01745blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMmac(A)cmr
NTS01747blaLEN, (blaSHV)aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(B)cmrsul2dfrA14
NTS01749blaLEN, blaSHV, blaTEMaad(A1/A2), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(A)cmrqacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA1, dfrA8
NTS01755blaLEN, blaSHVaad(A1/A2), aph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)mac(A), mac(B)tet(D)cmrqacEΔ1sul1, sul2dfrA7
NTS01793blaSHVaph3/str(A), aph6/str(B)
NTS01936blaLEN, blaSHV

bold indicates that microarray-detected blaCTX-M or blaSHV genes were PCR-confirmed (see S1 and S2 Tables). Results shown in parentheses indicates that blaSHV was detected by PCR but not by microarray.

bold indicates that microarray-detected blaCTX-M or blaSHV genes were PCR-confirmed (see S1 and S2 Tables). Results shown in parentheses indicates that blaSHV was detected by PCR but not by microarray.

Resistance to β-lactams

The ARDM v.2 content comprises probes for 52 β-lactamase genes, including 12 families of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and 15 carbapenemases. The ARDM detected blaSHV, a chromosomal gene presumptively carried in all K. pneumoniae [23], in 63 isolates (70%), while PCR detected blaSHV in an additional fourteen (S2 Table); 13 of the 90 isolates were negative for blaSHV by both methods, but this may be due to point mutations within the primer regions (PCR) or regions used for hybridization on the microarray. β-lactamase inhibitors such as clavulanate and sulbactam are typically active against Klebsiella SHV-1 and TEM-1 lactamases, but one-third of the isolates tested here showed resistance to at least one of these inhibitors. While such resistance may arise from hyperproduction of β-SHV lactamases [24], this resistance was highly correlated to the presence of blaTEM (P<0.0001), suggesting either TEM hyperproduction [25,26] or the possible presence of inhibitor-resistant TEM enzymes. The presence of blaOXA-1-like genes–most often conferring resistance to clavulanate and sulbactam–can also potentially explain phenotypic inhibitor resistance in two strains (MHK01590, MHK05068), although blaTEM genes are also present in both. However, strain MHK01305—positive for blaOXA-1-like, blaTEM, and blaCTX-M-1 family genes–is broadly susceptible to almost all tested β-lactams and lactam-inhibitor combinations, suggesting that either none of these genes are expressed or that the encoded gene products are non-functional. Nine strains were resistant to at least one third or fourth generation cephalosporin (Table 1), with six classified as ESBL producers by the MicroScan. Five of the ESBL-producing isolates were positive for blaCTX-M-1-group genes (confirmed by PCR, see S1 and S2 Tables). An additional three isolates also carried blaCTX-M-1-family genes, two of which were resistant to the third and fourth generation cephalosporins tested but negative for ESBL production by Microscan; one of these (MHK04922) also carried ampC/blaDHA, which can mask the ESBL phenotype [27]. One isolate (NTS01708) was positive for the blaCTX-M-2-family, which was also confirmed by PCR. The blaCTX-M-2 amplicon sequence (NCBI Accession no. KX377894) identified this gene as encoding a protein most similar to CTX-M-2 (Toho 1), CTX-M-20, CTX-M-56, CTX-M-75, CTX-M-95, CTX-M-165, and KLUA-9. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a gene from the blaCTX-M-2-family has been identified within Enterobacteriaceae from East Africa. Interestingly, this blaCTX-M-2-positive isolate were susceptible to both of the lactam/inhibitor combinations tested and all other tested β-lactams except ampicillin, suggesting that this gene was not transcribed or that the encoded proteins was non-functional. None of the 90 isolates were positive for genes encoding the CTX-M-8 and CTX-M-9 families of ESBLs. The preferential carriage of CTX-M-1-type enzymes over other ESBLs agrees with other studies of this region [28,29]. Only three isolates were phenotypically resistant to either imipenem (one isolate) or meropenem (two isolates). However, none of the 15 carbapenemase genes represented on the ARDM v.2 were detected.

Resistance to aminoglycosides

Isolates were tested for the presence of 44 different aminoglycoside resistance determinants. While only nine of the isolates were resistant to the three aminoglycosides tested, a relatively large number harbored genes commonly associated with aminoglycoside resistance: aac(3)-III (five isolates); aac(6)-Ib family (four isolates); aadA1/A2 family (18 isolates); aad(A4) (one isolate); aphA1 (seven isolates); aph3/str(A) (44 isolates); aph6/str(B) (47 isolates), and rmtB (one isolate). As the microarray cannot detect point mutations, we PCR-amplified and sequenced the aac(6)-Ib genes detected in four isolates to confirm that these alleles were not the aac(6)-Ib-cr variant conferring resistance to quinolones. The presence of aac(3)-III was correlated to phenotypic resistance to gentamicin and tobramycin (P < 0.0001) and aac(6)-Ib family genes to amikacin and tobramycin (P < 0.0001). Not surprisingly, the isolate harboring rmtB, which confers pan-resistance to aminoglycosides, was resistant to all three aminoglycosides.

Resistance to tetracyclines, chloramphenicol

Almost half of the isolates were non-susceptible to tetracycline. Phenotypic resistance was positively correlated to the presence of a tetracycline resistance determinant (P < 0.0005), although 10 isolates harboring resistance genes were phenotypically sensitive. Of the 38 tetracycline resistance genes on the ARDM v.2, only four were detected: tet(A) (18%), tet(D) (12%), tet(B) (10%), and tet(G) (1%). The ARDM v.2 chip also contains probes directed against 20 chloramphenicol resistance determinants. However, only four were detected in the tested population: cmr (32 isolates); two variants of floR originating from different species (one isolate); cmlA (one isolate); and catA1/cat4 (seven isolates). Phenotypic resistance to chloramphenicol was not assessed.

Resistance to quinolones

A single isolate (MHK02590) was resistant to both ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, while the remainder were susceptible to one (three isolates) or both quinolones tested (86 isolates). The plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance gene, qnrS, was observed in two isolates, of which one displayed intermediate susceptibility for ciprofloxacin. None of the other plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes were detected (norA, qnrA, qepA, aac(6)-Ib-cr). The ARDM is unable to identify mutations in gyrase or helicase genes that confer high-level resistance to quinolones.

Genes conferring resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins, and ansamycins

Ansamycins and macrolides, lincosamide, and streptogramin (MLS) antibiotics are not typically considered clinically relevant for treatment of Gram-negative infections. However, some researchers have suggested that commensal Gram-negative organisms may serve as a reservoir of AMR genes that can be transferred to other pathogens and organisms responsible for severe intestinal infections [30,31,32,33]. For this reason, the ARDM v.2 chip content includes ten MLS resistance genes derived from Gram-negative species, in addition to 31 MLS resistance genes derived from Gram-positive species. As expected, none of the isolates tested were positive for any of the Gram-positive-derived MLS resistance determinants, but Escherichia coli-derived genes, mph(A)/mph(K), mac(A), and mac(B), were detected in six, 29, and 25 isolates, respectively. All isolates positive for mac(B) also harbored mac(A). PCR amplification and amplicon sequencing confirmed that the microarray-detected mac(A) and mac(B) sequences are analogous to those derived from E. coli (NCBI accession nos. KX377891 through KX377893), although Klebsiella-derived analogs were also detected. Analogous mac(A) and mac(B) genes derived from Klebsiella spp. are only 70% identical to the E. coli genes and can be discriminated from the E. coli-derived genes by hybridization to the ARDM and amplicon sequencing (S2 Table). Two isolates were positive for the presence of the rifampicin resistance determinant, arr. The presence of arr and mphA/mphK within stool isolates of K. pneumoniae–while not clinically relevant in itself—may portend the spread of azithromycin or rifaximin resistance, respectively, to other intestinal pathogens, potentially limiting the effectiveness of these drugs for treatment of travelers' diarrhea [34,35].

Resistance to sulfonamides, quaternary amines, streptothricin, and trimethoprim

Sixty percent of the tested isolates were resistant to SXT, a first line agent for treatment of enteric infections in many parts of Africa [33,36]. Phenotypic resistance to SXT was highly correlated to the presence of a sulfonamide or trimethoprim resistance determinant (P << 0.0001). Approximately half of the tested isolates harbored at least one of the 28 trimethoprim resistance genes present on the ARDM: dfrA14 (18 isolates), dfrA1 (nine isolates), dfrA5 (seven isolates), dfrA7 or dfrA8 (5 isolates each), and dfrA12, dfrA13/21/22/23 family, dfrA15, dfrA16, and dfrA17 (three or fewer isolates each). The high rate of dfrA14-positive samples observed here contrasts with other studies showing a much higher proportion of dfrA1 and dfrA7 amongst African intestinal isolates [37,38]. Seven isolates harbored multiple dfrA genes. Present in 52.2% of the tested isolates, sul2 was the most frequently encountered sulfonamide resistance determinant. Sul1 was detected in 28 isolates, 21 of which also harbored sul2. In agreement with other studies of the region [37,39], sul3 was infrequently encountered (1 isolate). Twenty-seven of the 28 isolates positive for sul1 also harbored qacEΔ1. Although association of qac genes with phenotypic antiseptic resistance is currently under debate, co-carriage of qacEΔ1 with sul1 within the 3'-conserved sequences of many class 1 integrons is often linked to the presence of other resistance genes, presumptively as gene cassettes within the integrons [40]. The presence of intI1 –indicative of a class 1 integron—was confirmed in all qacEΔ1+/sul1+ isolates. IntI1 was detected in 20 additional strains by PCR, indicating the absence of a full 3'-conserved sequence amongst almost half of the integrons detected here (S2 Table). Carriage of class 1 integrons with alternative structures has previously been documented within Kenya, albeit at lower rates [39]. Similarly, co-carriage of dfrA1, aadA1/A2, and sat2 is often associated with the presence of class 2 integrons. PCR amplification of intI2 confirmed the presence of class 2 integrons in the three isolates harboring all three genes.

Discussion

With improvements in metagenomic sequencing and other methods to characterize intestinal microbiota, a number of recent studies have documented intestinal colonization with klebsiellae as a source of extra-intestinal infections [4] and an initial stage in many nosocomial infections [6,41]. Pertinent to the current study, intestinal klebsiellae and other Enterobacteriaceae may serve as reservoirs of AMR determinants, increasing the potential for highly resistant disease [10,12,42]. Here we have assessed a collection of 90 Klebsiella spp. intestinal isolates as a model for the accumulation and evolution of resistance assemblages within the gut of Kenyan individuals. Our data suggest that there is some selective pressure for the establishment and maintenance of bacterial populations resistant to multiple antimicrobial compounds within this region. The high proportion of isolates that were classified as MDR (36.7%), in a sample population not selected for resistance underscores this point, although some bias may have resulted from recent antibiotic use by the participants (no participant medical histories were available for most samples). Specific to Kenya, widespread use of tetracycline in livestock production [43], use of SXT and chloramphenicol as first line therapeutics for typhoid [2,44], and prophylactic use of SXT in persons exposed to or infected with HIV [45] may have contributed to the high prevalence of resistance to these compounds. These results are in line with other studies in East Africa showing similar rates of resistance and carriage of AMR genes [46,47,48]. On the other hand, while ciprofloxacin and third generation cephalosporins are widely distributed in Kenya [49,50,51,52], their high costs limit their use [53,54,55,56]. Thus, it was not surprising that only a small percentage of the tested population was resistant to fluoroquinolones or third/fourth generation cephalosporins, with a correspondingly low number of isolates positive for genes conferring resistance to these compounds. Similarly, carbapenem resistance was observed in only three isolates, and none of the 15 carbapenemase genes on the ARDM v.2 were identified here, including those detected in previous studies of the region where higher carbapenem resistance was observed (e.g., blaOXA-48, blaVIM, blaNDM, blaIMP, blaKPC) [57,58,59]. Differences in the current dataset and those of other studies in East Africa may simply reflect the particular species studied (e.g., E. coli, Klebsiella spp.), age and medical histories of participants, or the sample sources (e.g., urine, blood, stool). Alternatively, our results may suggest that availability and use of carbapenems are lower in Kenya than elsewhere in the region [60]. A large number of K. pneumoniae strains hybridized to the mac(A) and mac(B) probes derived from E. coli genes, although isolates carrying variants from both species were also identified (S2 Table). Interestingly, the presence of E. coli-derived mac(A)/mac(B) genes was also correlated with the presence of sequences hybridizing to an E. coli-derived cmr gene (P <0.0001), which is only ~80% identical to the Klebsiella spp. homolog. BLAST searches of the E. coli-derived mac(AB) sequences indicated that these sequences have not previously been documented in any klebsiellae. The breadth of genes on the microarray allowed us to detect multiple classes of resistance determinants, which may suggest the presence of integrons and/or plasmids associated with AMR. Strain MHK02590, isolated at Mbagathi District Hospital in Nairobi, was resistant to all tested antimicrobials except carbapenems and harbored 21 resistance determinants. Interestingly, Kariuki and colleagues [61] recently isolated an IncHI2 plasmid, pKST313, from a Kenyan Salmonella typhimurium carrying 11 of these determinants. While we did not attempt to confirm the presence of pKST313 in strain MHK02590, isolation of this strain within the Nairobi metropolitan area where pKST313 was first identified suggests that this plasmid may be circulating within this urban setting. This study had several limitations. As with any molecular method, genotype is not always fully predictive of phenotype. Though statistically valid genotypic/phenotypic correlations could be made for many genes in this study, a disconnect was observed between the presence of several β-lactamase and dihydrofolate reductase genes and the predicted resistance profiles. These discrepancies could be due to poor gene expression, non-functionality of the expressed gene products, or the presence of other genes or mechanisms not addressed. On the other hand, we were unable to identify the molecular mechanisms for carbapenem or fluoroquinolone non-susceptibility observed in a number of samples. While carbapenem resistance was likely due to the presence of a carbapenemase gene not currently included in the ARDM chip content, fluoroquinolone resistance is likely due to mutations in DNA gyrase and topoisomerase genes, gyrA and parC [62,63]. The ARDM cannot detect these mutations. In such an instance, a more comprehensive technique such as whole genome sequencing (WGS) might provide the needed information. An additional advantage of WGS is the ability to discriminate closely related alleles and identification of changes in regulatory sequences affecting gene expression. However, WGS may also miss the presence of important genes or point mutations if coverage is insufficient or error rates are too high [64]. Nonetheless, molecular approaches such as microarray hybridization and WGS can assist in tracking the epidemiological development and spread of AMR, a benefit not realized through phenotypic testing. Despite these limitations, we identified a high prevalence of MDR amongst a collection of Kenyan Klebsiella spp. stool isolates not specifically selected for their resistance characteristics. In most cases, phenotypic resistance was highly correlated to the presence of appropriate AMR determinants. While our results suggest that selective pressure exists for carriage of genes conferring resistance to tetracyclines, phenicols, trimethoprim, and sulfonamides, resistance to fluoroquinolones, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, and carbapenems was observed in only a small number of isolates, likely commensurate with regional usage. The wide variety of resistance determinants detected, the large number of isolates harboring five or more of these genes (65.5%) and the high prevalence of MDR phenotype (36.7%) underscore the need for more effective, targeted public health policies and infection control/prevention measures than those likely implemented in the population tested. Timely public health intervention to new and emerging sources of resistance are always important–and unfortunately often not available—in developing countries where access to second- and third-line antimicrobials may be limited.

PCR primers used for confirmation of specific AMR and integrase genes.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Comparison of resistance genes detected thru microarray hybridization and by PCR.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  52 in total

1.  Infectious diarrhoea in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV/AIDS patients in Kenya.

Authors:  Jane W Wanyiri; Henry Kanyi; Samuel Maina; David E Wang; Paul Ngugi; Roberta O'Connor; Timothy Kamau; Tabitha Waithera; Gachuhi Kimani; Claire N Wamae; Mkaya Mwamburi; Honorine D Ward
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.184

2.  Mechanisms of hyperproduction of TEM-1 beta-lactamase by clinical isolates of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P J Wu; K Shannon; I Phillips
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Comparison of nine phenotypic methods for detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production by Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Hélène Garrec; Laurence Drieux-Rouzet; Jean-Louis Golmard; Vincent Jarlier; Jérôme Robert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  An assessment of antimicrobial consumption in food producing animals in Kenya.

Authors:  E S Mitema; G M Kikuvi; H C Wegener; K Stohr
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.786

5.  Hospital outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to broad-spectrum cephalosporins and beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations by hyperproduction of SHV-5 beta-lactamase.

Authors:  G L French; K P Shannon; N Simmons
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Does cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV-associated opportunistic infections select for resistant pathogens in Kenyan adults?

Authors:  Mary J Hamel; Carolyn Greene; Tom Chiller; Peter Ouma; Christina Polyak; Kephas Otieno; John Williamson; Ya Ping Shi; Daniel R Feikin; Barbara Marston; John T Brooks; Amanda Poe; Zhiyong Zhou; Benjamin Ochieng; Eric Mintz; Laurence Slutsker
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in 36 developing and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis.

Authors:  A Cameron; M Ewen; D Ross-Degnan; D Ball; R Laing
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Antibiotic resistance of faecal Escherichia coli from healthy volunteers from eight developing countries.

Authors:  S Nys; I N Okeke; S Kariuki; G J Dinant; C Driessen; E E Stobberingh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Molecular characterization of multidrug resistant hospital isolates using the antimicrobial resistance determinant microarray.

Authors:  Tomasz A Leski; Gary J Vora; Brian R Barrows; Guillermo Pimentel; Brent L House; Matilda Nicklasson; Momtaz Wasfy; Mohamed Abdel-Maksoud; Chris Rowe Taitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transfer of carbapenem-resistant plasmid from Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 to Escherichia coli in patient.

Authors:  Moran G Goren; Yehuda Carmeli; Mitchell J Schwaber; Inna Chmelnitsky; Vered Schechner; Shiri Navon-Venezia
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  10 in total

1.  High Rate of Association of 16S rRNA Methylases and Carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae Recovered from Hospitalized Children in Angola.

Authors:  Laurent Poirel; Juliette Goutines; Marta Aires-de-Sousa; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Antimicrobial resistance profiles and genetic basis of resistance among non-fastidious Gram-negative bacteria recovered from ready-to-eat foods in Kibera informal housing in Nairobi, Kenya.

Authors:  John Maina; Perpetual Ndung'u; Anne Muigai; John Kiiru
Journal:  Access Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-11

3.  Diarrhoeagenic E. coli occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases isolated from diarrhoea patients attending health facilities in Accra, Ghana.

Authors:  Helena Dela; Beverly Egyir; Ayodele O Majekodunmi; Eric Behene; Clara Yeboah; Dominic Ackah; Richard N A Bongo; Bassirou Bonfoh; Jakob Zinsstag; Langbong Bimi; Kennedy Kwasi Addo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates in Kenya by Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Angela Muraya; Cecilia Kyany'a; Shahiid Kiyaga; Hunter J Smith; Caleb Kibet; Melissa J Martin; Josephine Kimani; Lillian Musila
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-05-05

5.  Molecular epidemiology of virulence and antimicrobial resistance determinants in Klebsiella pneumoniae from hospitalised patients in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.

Authors:  Tolbert Sonda; Happiness Kumburu; Marco van Zwetselaar; Michael Alifrangis; Blandina T Mmbaga; Ole Lund; Gibson S Kibiki; Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Virulent and multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from clinical samples in Balochistan.

Authors:  Sareeen Fatima; Faiza Liaqat; Ali Akbar; Muhammad Sahfee; Abdul Samad; Muhammad Anwar; Shazia Iqbal; Shabir Ahmad Khan; Haleema Sadia; Gul Makai; Anila Bahadur; Wajeeha Naeem; Adnan Khan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Whole genome sequencing snapshot of multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains from hospitals and receiving wastewater treatment plants in Southern Romania.

Authors:  Marius Surleac; Ilda Czobor Barbu; Simona Paraschiv; Laura Ioana Popa; Irina Gheorghe; Luminita Marutescu; Marcela Popa; Ionela Sarbu; Daniela Talapan; Mihai Nita; Alina Viorica Iancu; Manuela Arbune; Alina Manole; Serban Nicolescu; Oana Sandulescu; Adrian Streinu-Cercel; Dan Otelea; Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Tracking Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants in Diarrheal Pathogens: A Cross-Institutional Pilot Study.

Authors:  Chris R Taitt; Tomasz A Leski; Michael G Prouty; Gavin W Ford; Vireak Heang; Brent L House; Samuel Y Levin; Jennifer A Curry; Adel Mansour; Hanan El Mohammady; Momtaz Wasfy; Drake Hamilton Tilley; Michael J Gregory; Matthew R Kasper; James Regeimbal; Paul Rios; Guillermo Pimentel; Brook A Danboise; Christine E Hulseberg; Elizabeth A Odundo; Abigael N Ombogo; Erick K Cheruiyot; Cliff O Philip; Gary J Vora
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas spp. isolates from clinical specimens from a hospital in Nairobi, Kenya.

Authors:  Jennifer Lord; Agricola Odoi; Anthony Gikonyo; Amos Miwa
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Whole genome sequencing of Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates sequence type 627 isolated from Egyptian patients.

Authors:  Shymaa Enany; Samira Zakeer; Aya A Diab; Usama Bakry; Ahmed A Sayed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.