BACKGROUND: Co-trimoxazole (fixed-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) prophylaxis administered before antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces morbidity in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We investigated whether children and adolescents receiving long-term ART in sub-Saharan Africa could discontinue co-trimoxazole. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, noninferiority trial of stopping versus continuing daily open-label co-trimoxazole in children and adolescents in Uganda and Zimbabwe. Eligible participants were older than 3 years of age, had been receiving ART for more than 96 weeks, were using insecticide-treated bed nets (in malaria-endemic areas), and had not had Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Coprimary end points were hospitalization or death and adverse events of grade 3 or 4. RESULTS: A total of 758 participants were randomly assigned to stop or continue co-trimoxazole (382 and 376 participants, respectively), after receiving ART for a median of 2.1 years (interquartile range, 1.8 to 2.3). The median age was 7.9 years (interquartile range, 4.6 to 11.1), and the median CD4 T-cell percentage was 33% (interquartile range, 26 to 39). Participants who stopped co-trimoxazole had higher rates of hospitalization or death than those who continued (72 participants [19%] vs. 48 [13%]; hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14 to 2.37; P = 0.007; noninferiority not shown). There was no evidence of variation across ages (P=0.93 for interaction). A total of 2 participants in the prophylaxis-stopped group (1%) died, as did 3 in the prophylaxis-continued group (1%). Most hospitalizations in the prophylaxis-stopped group were for malaria (49 events, vs. 21 in the prophylaxis-continued group) or infections other than malaria (53 vs. 25), particularly pneumonia, sepsis, and meningitis. Rates of adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were similar in the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.72; P=0.33), but more grade 4 adverse events occurred in the prophylaxis-stopped group (hazard ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.99 to 4.22; P=0.05), with anemia accounting for the largest number of events (12, vs. 2 with continued prophylaxis). CONCLUSIONS: Continuing co-trimoxazole prophylaxis after 96 weeks of ART was beneficial, as compared with stopping prophylaxis, with fewer hospitalizations for both malaria and infection not related to malaria. (Funded by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council and others; ARROW Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN24791884.).
BACKGROUND: Co-trimoxazole (fixed-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) prophylaxis administered before antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces morbidity in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We investigated whether children and adolescents receiving long-term ART in sub-Saharan Africa could discontinue co-trimoxazole. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, noninferiority trial of stopping versus continuing daily open-label co-trimoxazole in children and adolescents in Uganda and Zimbabwe. Eligible participants were older than 3 years of age, had been receiving ART for more than 96 weeks, were using insecticide-treated bed nets (in malaria-endemic areas), and had not had Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Coprimary end points were hospitalization or death and adverse events of grade 3 or 4. RESULTS: A total of 758 participants were randomly assigned to stop or continue co-trimoxazole (382 and 376 participants, respectively), after receiving ART for a median of 2.1 years (interquartile range, 1.8 to 2.3). The median age was 7.9 years (interquartile range, 4.6 to 11.1), and the median CD4 T-cell percentage was 33% (interquartile range, 26 to 39). Participants who stopped co-trimoxazole had higher rates of hospitalization or death than those who continued (72 participants [19%] vs. 48 [13%]; hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14 to 2.37; P = 0.007; noninferiority not shown). There was no evidence of variation across ages (P=0.93 for interaction). A total of 2 participants in the prophylaxis-stopped group (1%) died, as did 3 in the prophylaxis-continued group (1%). Most hospitalizations in the prophylaxis-stopped group were for malaria (49 events, vs. 21 in the prophylaxis-continued group) or infections other than malaria (53 vs. 25), particularly pneumonia, sepsis, and meningitis. Rates of adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were similar in the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.72; P=0.33), but more grade 4 adverse events occurred in the prophylaxis-stopped group (hazard ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.99 to 4.22; P=0.05), with anemia accounting for the largest number of events (12, vs. 2 with continued prophylaxis). CONCLUSIONS: Continuing co-trimoxazole prophylaxis after 96 weeks of ART was beneficial, as compared with stopping prophylaxis, with fewer hospitalizations for both malaria and infection not related to malaria. (Funded by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council and others; ARROW Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN24791884.).
Authors: Samuel S Malamba; Jonathan Mermin; Arthur Reingold; John R Lule; Robert Downing; Ray Ransom; Aminah Kigozi; Ben M Hunt; Alan Hubbard; Philip J Rosenthal; Grant Dorsey Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: S Z Wiktor; M Sassan-Morokro; A D Grant; L Abouya; J M Karon; C Maurice; G Djomand; A Ackah; K Domoua; A Kadio; A Yapi; P Combe; O Tossou; T H Roels; E M Lackritz; D Coulibaly; K M De Cock; I M Coulibaly; A E Greenberg Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-05-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C Chintu; G J Bhat; A S Walker; V Mulenga; F Sinyinza; K Lishimpi; L Farrelly; N Kaganson; A Zumla; S H Gillespie; A J Nunn; D M Gibb Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Nov 20-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A S Walker; D Ford; C F Gilks; P Munderi; F Ssali; A Reid; E Katabira; H Grosskurth; P Mugyenyi; J Hakim; J H Darbyshire; D M Gibb; A G Babiker Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-03-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Anne F Gasasira; Moses R Kamya; Edwin O Ochong; Neil Vora; Jane Achan; Edwin Charlebois; Theodore Ruel; Fredrick Kateera; Denise N Meya; Diane Havlir; Philip J Rosenthal; Grant Dorsey Journal: Malar J Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Thomas Gsponer; Ralf Weigel; Mary-Ann Davies; Carolyn Bolton; Harry Moultrie; Paula Vaz; Helena Rabie; Karl Technau; James Ndirangu; Brian Eley; Daniela Garone; Maureen Wellington; Janet Giddy; Jochen Ehmer; Matthias Egger; Olivia Keiser Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-09-17 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1976-12 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: A Bamford; A Turkova; H Lyall; C Foster; N Klein; D Bastiaans; D Burger; S Bernadi; K Butler; E Chiappini; P Clayden; M Della Negra; V Giacomet; C Giaquinto; D Gibb; L Galli; M Hainaut; M Koros; L Marques; E Nastouli; T Niehues; A Noguera-Julian; P Rojo; C Rudin; H J Scherpbier; G Tudor-Williams; S B Welch Journal: HIV Med Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Moses R Kamya; James Kapisi; Victor Bigira; Tamara D Clark; Stephen Kinara; Florence Mwangwa; Mary K Muhindo; Abel Kakuru; Francesca T Aweeka; Liusheng Huang; Prasanna Jagannathan; Jane Achan; Diane V Havlir; Philip J Rosenthal; Grant Dorsey Journal: AIDS Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Nyanyiwe M Mbeye; Feiko O ter Kuile; Mary-Ann Davies; Kamija S Phiri; Matthias Egger; Gilles Wandeler Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 2.622