BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular progenitor cells (CPCs) have been cultured on various scaffolds to resolve the challenge of cell retention after transplantation and to improve functional outcome after cell-based cardiac therapy. Previous studies have reported successful culture of fully differentiated cardiomyocytes on scaffolds of various types, and ongoing efforts are focused on optimizing the mix of cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells as well as on the identification of a source of progenitors capable of reversing cardiovascular damage. A scaffold culture that fosters cell differentiation into cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells while maintaining a progenitor reserve would benefit allogeneic cell transplantation. METHODS: Isl-1 + c-Kit + CPCs were isolated as clonal populations from human and sheep heart tissue. After hyper-crosslinked carbohydrate polymer scaffold culture, cells were assessed for differentiation, intracellular signaling, cell cycling, and growth factor/chemokine expression using real time polymerase chain reaction, flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and calcium staining. RESULTS: Insulin-like growth factor 1, hepatocyte growth factor, and stromal cell derived factor 1α paracrine factors were induced, protein kinase B signaling was activated, extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation was reduced and differentiation into both cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells was induced by scaffold-based cell culture. Interestingly, movement of CPCs out of the G1 phase of the cell cycle and increased expression of pluripotency genes PLOU5F1 (Oct4) and T (Brachyury) within a portion of the cultured population occurred, which suggests the maintenance of a progenitor population. Two-color immunostaining and 3-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis confirmed the presence of both Isl-1 expressing undifferentiated cells and differentiated cells identified by troponin T and von Willebrand factor expression. Ki-67 labeling verified the presence of proliferating cells that remained in situ alongside the differentiated functional derivatives. CONCLUSIONS: Cloned Isl-1 + c-kit + CPCs maintained on a hyper-cross linked polymer scaffold retain dual potential for proliferation and differentiation, providing a scaffold-based stem cell source for transplantation of committed and proliferating cardiovascular progenitors for functional testing in preclinical models of cell-based repair.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular progenitor cells (CPCs) have been cultured on various scaffolds to resolve the challenge of cell retention after transplantation and to improve functional outcome after cell-based cardiac therapy. Previous studies have reported successful culture of fully differentiated cardiomyocytes on scaffolds of various types, and ongoing efforts are focused on optimizing the mix of cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells as well as on the identification of a source of progenitors capable of reversing cardiovascular damage. A scaffold culture that fosters cell differentiation into cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells while maintaining a progenitor reserve would benefit allogeneic cell transplantation. METHODS:Isl-1 + c-Kit + CPCs were isolated as clonal populations from human and sheep heart tissue. After hyper-crosslinked carbohydrate polymer scaffold culture, cells were assessed for differentiation, intracellular signaling, cell cycling, and growth factor/chemokine expression using real time polymerase chain reaction, flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and calcium staining. RESULTS:Insulin-like growth factor 1, hepatocyte growth factor, and stromal cell derived factor 1α paracrine factors were induced, protein kinase B signaling was activated, extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation was reduced and differentiation into both cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells was induced by scaffold-based cell culture. Interestingly, movement of CPCs out of the G1 phase of the cell cycle and increased expression of pluripotency genes PLOU5F1 (Oct4) and T (Brachyury) within a portion of the cultured population occurred, which suggests the maintenance of a progenitor population. Two-color immunostaining and 3-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis confirmed the presence of both Isl-1 expressing undifferentiated cells and differentiated cells identified by troponin T and von Willebrand factor expression. Ki-67 labeling verified the presence of proliferating cells that remained in situ alongside the differentiated functional derivatives. CONCLUSIONS: Cloned Isl-1 + c-kit + CPCs maintained on a hyper-cross linked polymer scaffold retain dual potential for proliferation and differentiation, providing a scaffold-based stem cell source for transplantation of committed and proliferating cardiovascular progenitors for functional testing in preclinical models of cell-based repair.
Manipulating the limited regenerative capacity of the human heart through endogenous cardiovascular progenitor cells (CPCs) presents a promising avenue for cardiovascular repair.[1-10] The transplantation of tissue on supportive structures made of biodegradable materials has been receiving increasing attention.[11-14] This transition to a biomimetic, 3-dimensional (3D) apparatus reflects the use of extracellular matrix (ECM)-like conditions.[12] Stem cell-derived cardiac tissues require cellular organization into a functional, 3D structure. These structures facilitate conditions under which growth and differentiation occur because their mechanical properties and topography more closely approximate the in vivo environment.[13] Furthermore, it is possible to develop cardiac tissue with a homogenous distribution of viable cells that express both early transcription factors and cardiomyocyte markers.[14] Tissue printing[14] and harvested organs[15] both have made use of the biomimetic nature of this 3D structural support. The use of patient-derived CPCs can similarly be applied to a 3D environment to promote the development of cardiac tissue.The use of a cardiac progenitor that has direct cardiomyogenic potential, such as endogenous CPCs, during transplantation may facilitate regeneration. Previous studies that have made use of hematopoietic stem cells[16,17] and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)18 raised concerns over the myogenic capacity of these cell types. Godier-Furnémont et al,[4] used MSCs in 1 such study. Although enhanced angiogenic potential was noted, the authors acknowledged that cardiomyogenic differentiation of MSCs was unlikely. Using these progenitor types that are not closely related to cardiac derivatives have resulted in underwhelming clinical trials.[19] Because cardiomyocyte proliferation is limited, it has been challenging to transplant myocytes and achieve tissue-like cell densities.[12,20,21] Questions regarding the integration of transplanted cells into myocardium[18,22] and their ability to produce a biologically necessary ratio of cardiomyocytes to vascular tissue have arisen.[23] For example, printing cardiac tissue has produced cardiomyocytes, but whether this method produces additional necessary cardiac derivatives is unknown.[14] A scaffold that promotes the development of an array of cardiac lineages while maintaining a proliferative stem cell reserve could address these barriers to scaffold-based cardiac repair.Here, we use a hyper-crosslinked carbohydrate polymer scaffold to simultaneously culture and differentiate Isl-1 + c-Kit + CPCs[3] that have been derived from humanpatients and from sheep. We use the sheep model to optimize conditions for transplantation as this model is relevant for application to cardiovascular transplantation in humans. Culturing CPCs using a scaffold attempts to closely approximate the in vivo environment of the stem cell.[24] We further this work by demonstrating the applicability of both the CPCs presented herein and the scaffold for cardiac tissue regeneration. In doing so, we assessed the ability of this scaffold to influence the cell cycle towards a proliferative state while promoting the differentiation of certain cells within the population. We demonstrate changes in growth factor expression as well as MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (AKT) signaling after scaffold culture. Because the ovine faithfully reflects cardiac repair mechanisms in humans and represents a useful animal model in which stem cell transplantation conditions can be optimized,[25,26] we extended this line of inquiry to ovine-derived CPCs. We observed a similar result of cardiac differentiation in some cells on the scaffold while a proportion of cells were maintained in a progenitor state. We report here a scaffold that is suitable for culturing CPCs that can proliferate, as is done in the stem cell niches that maintain a reserve pool of progenitors, and can differentiate such that specified tissue growth can occur, thereby promoting conditions that support the regeneration of cardiac tissue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Institutional Review Board
The institutional review board of Loma Linda University approved the use of tissue that was discarded during cardiovascular surgery, without identifiable private information, for this study with a waiver of informed consent.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
All experimental procedures involving animals were performed within the regulations of the Animal Welfare Act, the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Loma Linda University.
CPC Isolation
CPCs were isolated from surgical biopsies of human neonates (8 days of age) and adults (55-75 years of age) as described previously.[27] Right atrial cardiac tissue was mechanically digested and treated with collagenase (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) for 2 hours at 37°C. CPCs were cultured in M199-supplemented limiting dilution media at a concentration of 0.8 cells per well to create the clonal populations that were expanded for use in this study. CPCs were similarly isolated and selected from neonatal sheep (9-10 days of age), which were previously characterized.[28]
Cell Growth on the Scaffold
Before cell seeding, an 8 × 2-mm GroCell-3D hyper-crosslinked carbohydrate polymer scaffold (Molecular Matrix, Davis, CA) with 20- to 80-μm pores was placed in M199-supplemented growth media at 37°C overnight. The GroCell-3D scaffold is comprised of organic material and has a porosity of 97%. A 20-μL paste of 2 × 106 CPCs in growth media was placed on top of the culture-soaked scaffold and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2 before being placed in growth media. Over 3 weeks, cells that detached from the scaffold were reseeded as needed. Scaffolds were dissolved for subsequent analysis. Dissolution solution (Molecular Matrix) was used to disperse cells with a modified manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, the solution was mixed with M199-supplemented growth media and placed onto the scaffold, before being incubated at 37°C for 90 minutes with agitation. The cells were pelleted at 200g for 8.5 minutes and resuspended for subsequent analysis.
Phosphorylation Assay Using Flow Cytometry
We assessed intracellular signaling by measuring the phosphorylation of ERK and AKT using flow cytometry. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized using methanol, and stained using antibodies against p-ERK 1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA; clone: D13.14.4E), and p-AKT (Ser473; Cell Signaling Technology; clone: D9E). FITCgoat anti-rabbit IgG (BD Biosciences San Jose, CA) was used as a secondary antibody. Staining with secondary antibody alone was used to define positive and negative populations. Western blot measurements correspond to those obtained by flow cytometry.[29-31]
Stem Cell Progenitor Marker Detection Using Flow Cytometry
We used flow cytometry to measure Isl-1, c-kit, kinase insert domain protein receptor (known as Flk-1) (KDR), and PDGFRα as well as the coexpression of Isl-1 and c-kit. First, cells were labeled to detect KDR and PDGFRα using CD140a-PE (PDGFRα; clone: 16A1) and PerCP/Cy5.5-conjugated VEFGR2 (also known as FLK1 or KDR) antibodies (Biolegend, San Diego, CA). Isotype controls were matched to the species, isotype, and conjugated fluorophore. These isotypes were used to define negative and positive populations. Isl-1 and c-kit expression was detected in isolation and jointly using DyLight650-conjugated c-kit antibody (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO; clone: 2B8) with Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated isotype control (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and anti-humanIsl-1 primary antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA; clone: 1H9) with goat, anti-mouseFITC-conjugated secondary antibody (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL). Staining with secondary antibody alone used to define positive and negative populations for Isl1. Fluorescently labeled cells were analyzed using MACSquant analyzer (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) and FlowJo software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR). Dead cells were gated out using forward-scatter and side-scatter gating.
Dexamethasone Differentiation of CPCs
CPCs were differentiated using dexamethasone.[6] Briefly, cells were cultured for 6 days in M199-supplemented growth media containing 10-nM dexamethasone. Differentiation markers for cardiomyocytes (troponin T [TropT] and troponin I [TropI]), endothelium (von Willebrand factor [vWF]), and smooth muscle (smooth muscle actin [SMA]) were measured using flow cytometry.
Differentiation Marker Detection Using Flow Cytometry
We used flow cytometry to measure the level of expression of the differentiation markers TropT and vWF, as described previously.[27] Lightning-Link Antibody Labeling Kit (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO) was used to conjugate rabbit anti-humanvon-Willbrand factor antibody (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) to FITC and anti-cardiac TropT antibody (Abcam) to PE. Cells were stained with FITC-conjugated vWF and PE-conjugated TropT. Cells were stained with anti-TropI antibody (Millipore, Temecula, CA) and anti-SMA antibody (clone: 1A4; Abcam) before being incubated with PE-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL). To perform 3-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis, we used anti-humanIsl-1 primary antibody (Abcam), Alexa Fluor647-conjugated anti-humanvWF (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO; clone: 3E2D10), and PE-conjugated anti-human TropT (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). Isotype controls were matched to the species, isotype, and conjugated fluorophore. Isotype controls or secondary antibody alone were used to define positive and negative populations. Optimal antibody concentrations were determined by titration.
Cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry
Cell cycle analysis was conducted using flow cytometry, as previously described.[3] Cells were fixed with ethanol and stored for 1 hour at −20°C before being incubated at 37°C with RNase A (0.5 mg/mL; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 1 hour. Propidium iodide (Biolegend) was added at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml.
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Cells were lysed using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Two micrograms of RNA were isolated and used to prepare cDNA with Superscript III (Invitrogen). Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was run using an IQ5 thermocycler (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA) with β actin as a housekeeping gene. The PCR conditions for all primer pairs (except Bry, Mesp1, and PDGFRα) were: 94°C for 10 minutes and 40 cycles of 94°C for 15 seconds, 52°C for 60 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds. The PCR conditions for Bry, Mesp1, and PDGFRα were: 94°C for 10 minutes and 40 cycles of 94 °C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 60 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds. Primer pairs are listed in Table 1 and were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA).
TABLE 1
Primers used for RT-PCR experiments
Primers used for RT-PCR experiments
Calcium flux
Fifty micrograms of fluo4-AM dye (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was dissolved in pluronic acid and 20% DMSO (Life Technologies) via sonication before being resuspended in M199-supplemented growth media. Cells were incubated with the dye for 1 hour and imaged using a LSM 710 NLO laser-scanning, confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmblt, Jena, Germany) at a 20× objective. All experiments were conducted at room temperature and in the absence of external electrical stimulation. Images were processed using ImageJ (v.1.49, NIH, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij).
Immunohistochemistry
Scaffolds were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO) overnight and washed with successive dilutions of ethanol for thirty minutes. Scaffolds were washed twice with xylene and embedded in paraffin at 58°C. The paraffin block was sectioned using a manual rotary microtome (model RM 2125; Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL). The sectioned scaffolds were deparaffinized and blocked using 10% species-appropriate serum in 3% glycine and PBS for 30 minutes before being stained. For both 1- and 2-color immunohistochemistry (IHC), the primary antibodies included mouse anti-Ki-67 (1:100 dilution; Biolegend), mouse anti-Isl-1 (Abcam), rabbit anti-vWF (Dako), and rabbit anti-TropT (Abcam). Incubation was performed at 4°C. Each section was washed with PBS/Tween 20, incubated with a secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature. For 1-color IHC, the secondary antibodies included goat anti-mousePE (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL) or donkey anti-rabbitAlexa Fluor 647 (Life Technologies). For 2-color, the secondary antibodies included goat anti-mouseAlexa Fluor 488 (Life Technologies) or goat anti-rabbitAlexa Fluor 594 (Life Technologies). Slides were mounted in Prolong Gold with DAPI (Life Technologies). Sections were imaged using a LSM 710 NLO laser-scanning, confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmblt, Jena, Germany) at a 20× objective. Images were processed using ImageJ (v.1.49, NIH, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij).
Cell Proliferation and In Vivo Tracking
Cells were stained with CFSE (Biolegend), seeded onto the scaffold and cultured before IHC analysis (above).
Statistical Analyses
For all normally distributed data, a 2-tailed, paired, Student t test was performed using Microsoft Excel. Statistical significance was assumed at P < 0.05. Data are represented as the mean ± standard error.
RESULTS
CPCs Express Markers of Early Cardiogenic Mesoderm and Primordial Cardiovascular Progenitors
CPCs from human cardiac tissue were screened for the expression of early markers of cardiovascular differentiation. The phenotypic and functional characteristics of these cells were previously characterized.[3] As shown in Figures 1A to C, CPC clones express markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm and primordial cardiovascular progenitors as well as display an ability to differentiate into cardiac derivatives (ie, cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle, and endothelium; Figure 1D). The expression of markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm was assessed using flow cytometry (Figures 1A-B) and by visualizing amplicons (Figure 1C). Gene expression analysis indicated the presence of Mesp-1 and brachyury (Bry); the robust coexpression of Isl-1 and c-kit; and the expression of nascent cardiac progenitor markers, including PDGFRα and KDR. Taken together, this indicates that the CPCs used for experiments represent a state of development characteristic of early cardiogenic mesoderm and primordial cardiovascular progenitors (Figure 1E).
FIGURE 1
CPCs express markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm.[32-36] CPCs used for experiments uniquely express markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm. The expression of markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm was assessed using flow cytometry (A-B). Notably, 2-color FACS analysis indicates the co-expression of Isl-1 and c-kit (B; negative population inset). We visualized amplicons of genes of interest using gel electrophoresis to verify this expression (C). CPCs express Mesp-1, Bry, Isl-1, c-kit, and PDGFRα. To confirm the multipotency of the CPCs, 10 nM of dexamethasone was used to induce the development of cardiomyocytes (TropT and TropI), endothelium (vWF), and smooth muscle (SMA). Antibodies against these proteins were measured using flow cytometry and reported as the change in mean fluorescence intensity compared with undifferentiated CPCs (D). As shown in panel E, mesoderm differentiates into cardiogenic mesoderm, which has the capacity to become several types of cardiac cells, including cardiomyocytes, endothelium, and smooth muscle. These human cardiac progenitors may give rise to sinoatrial nodal cells; however, the timing and location of specification is currently undetermined. Values represent the mean ± S.E.M. n = 7.
CPCs express markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm.[32-36] CPCs used for experiments uniquely express markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm. The expression of markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm was assessed using flow cytometry (A-B). Notably, 2-color FACS analysis indicates the co-expression of Isl-1 and c-kit (B; negative population inset). We visualized amplicons of genes of interest using gel electrophoresis to verify this expression (C). CPCs express Mesp-1, Bry, Isl-1, c-kit, and PDGFRα. To confirm the multipotency of the CPCs, 10 nM of dexamethasone was used to induce the development of cardiomyocytes (TropT and TropI), endothelium (vWF), and smooth muscle (SMA). Antibodies against these proteins were measured using flow cytometry and reported as the change in mean fluorescence intensity compared with undifferentiated CPCs (D). As shown in panel E, mesoderm differentiates into cardiogenic mesoderm, which has the capacity to become several types of cardiac cells, including cardiomyocytes, endothelium, and smooth muscle. These human cardiac progenitors may give rise to sinoatrial nodal cells; however, the timing and location of specification is currently undetermined. Values represent the mean ± S.E.M. n = 7.
Patient-Derived CPCs Exhibit Markers of Pluripotency and Cardiac Derivatives on the Hyper-Crosslinked Carbohydrate Polymer Scaffold
We assessed the effect of scaffold culture on the maintenance of a CPC population (Isl1) and on the development of cardiomyocytes (TropT) and endothelial cells (vWF). Two- and 3-color FACS analysis indicated the expression of only Isl1 under control culture conditions, but of Isl1 along with TropT and vWF under scaffold culture conditions (Figures 2A-C). We confirmed the presence of cardiac derivatives by independently measuring the protein expression of TropT and vWF using FACS analysis (Figure 2D, n = 5, P < 0.001). We then confirmed this concomitant maintenance of pluripotency and promotion of differentiation using RT-PCR, which indicated a significant 52-fold and 27-fold increase in the expression of TNNT2 (TropT) and myosin regulatory light chain 2, ventricular isoform (MLC2V), respectively (Figure 2E, n = 3, P < 0.001). Similar to our findings by FACS analysis, we also identified a 70-fold increase in POU5F1 (OCT4) expression (Figure 2E, n = 3, P < 0.001) and a 69-fold increase in T (Bry) expression (Figure 2E, n = 3, P < 0.05). To determine whether scaffold-cultured CPCs maintained their proliferative potential, we performed cell cycle analysis, which indicated a punctuated G1 phase (Figure 2F, n = 3, P < 0.05).
FIGURE 2
Scaffold-cultured CPCs exhibit a reduced G1 phase and markers of differentiation. Human-derived CPCs were scaffold-cultured. Two- and 3-color FACS analysis (A-C) indicated the expression of only Isl1 under control culture conditions (red), but of Isl1 along with TropT and vWF under scaffold culture conditions (blue). Populations were defined using unstained cells (grey). Flow cytometry verified the expression of TropT and vWF (D, n = 5, P < 0.001). RT-PCR indicated a significant 52-fold and 27-fold increase in the expression of TNNT2 (TropT) and MLC2V, respectively (E, n = 3, P < 0.001). As indicated by FACS analysis, we also measured a 70-fold increase in POU5F1 (OCT4) expression (E, n = 3, P < 0.001) and a 69-fold increase in T (Bry) expression (E, n = 3, P < 0.05). To determine whether scaffold-cultured CPCs maintained their proliferative potential, we performed cell cycle analysis, which indicated a punctuated G1 phase (F, n = 3, P < 0.05). Mean values are reported, while error bars represent the S.E.M. *P < 0.05, n = 3; ***P < 0.001, n = 4.
Scaffold-cultured CPCs exhibit a reduced G1 phase and markers of differentiation. Human-derived CPCs were scaffold-cultured. Two- and 3-color FACS analysis (A-C) indicated the expression of only Isl1 under control culture conditions (red), but of Isl1 along with TropT and vWF under scaffold culture conditions (blue). Populations were defined using unstained cells (grey). Flow cytometry verified the expression of TropT and vWF (D, n = 5, P < 0.001). RT-PCR indicated a significant 52-fold and 27-fold increase in the expression of TNNT2 (TropT) and MLC2V, respectively (E, n = 3, P < 0.001). As indicated by FACS analysis, we also measured a 70-fold increase in POU5F1 (OCT4) expression (E, n = 3, P < 0.001) and a 69-fold increase in T (Bry) expression (E, n = 3, P < 0.05). To determine whether scaffold-cultured CPCs maintained their proliferative potential, we performed cell cycle analysis, which indicated a punctuated G1 phase (F, n = 3, P < 0.05). Mean values are reported, while error bars represent the S.E.M. *P < 0.05, n = 3; ***P < 0.001, n = 4.
After incubation with Fluo4-AM, a calcium dye, scaffold-cultured CPCs were imaged. Regions of interest were drawn around cells using ImageJ and the intensity of fluorescence in each region was quantified for each frame. As shown in Figure 3A, the scaffold-cultured CPCs exhibit an autorhythmic trafficking of calcium, which is a feature of mature cardiomyocytes, whereas flask-cultured CPCs do not (n = 5-7). Representative frames for sequential time points are shown for control and scaffold-cultured CPCs in Figures 3B and C, respectively.
FIGURE 3
After scaffold culturing, cells display rhythmic pattern of calcium flux. After incubation with Fluo4-AM, a calcium dye, scaffold-cultured CPCs were imaged. Regions of interest were drawn around cells using ImageJ and the intensity of fluorescence in each region of interest was quantified for each frame. The scaffold-cultured CPCs exhibit an auto-rhythmic trafficking of calcium, which is a feature of mature cardiomyocytes, whereas control CPCs do not (A; n = 5-7). Representative frames for sequential time points are shown for control (B) and scaffold-cultured (C) CPCs.
After scaffold culturing, cells display rhythmic pattern of calcium flux. After incubation with Fluo4-AM, a calcium dye, scaffold-cultured CPCs were imaged. Regions of interest were drawn around cells using ImageJ and the intensity of fluorescence in each region of interest was quantified for each frame. The scaffold-cultured CPCs exhibit an auto-rhythmic trafficking of calcium, which is a feature of mature cardiomyocytes, whereas control CPCs do not (A; n = 5-7). Representative frames for sequential time points are shown for control (B) and scaffold-cultured (C) CPCs.
ERK Activation Significantly Decreased While AKT Activation Increased in Scaffold-Cultured CPCs
We assessed changes in the activation of signaling molecules using flow cytometry to detect P-ERK and P-AKT. We observed a significant decrease in the number of P-ERK+ scaffold-cultured CPCs (n = 4, P < 0.05). We observed a general increase in P-AKT+ scaffold-cultured CPCs (Figures 4A-B).
FIGURE 4
ERK phosphorylation decreases and AKT phosphorylation exhibits an increasing trend after scaffold culturing. Fluorophore-conjugated antibodies were used to detect the concentrations of (A) phosphorylated ERK1/2 (P-ERK+) and (B) phosphorylated AKT (P-AKT+) in cultured patient-derived CPCs. The phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was significantly reduced while the phosphorylation of AKT generally increased in the scaffold-cultured CPCs. Values represent the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, n = 4.
ERK phosphorylation decreases and AKT phosphorylation exhibits an increasing trend after scaffold culturing. Fluorophore-conjugated antibodies were used to detect the concentrations of (A) phosphorylated ERK1/2 (P-ERK+) and (B) phosphorylated AKT (P-AKT+) in cultured patient-derived CPCs. The phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was significantly reduced while the phosphorylation of AKT generally increased in the scaffold-cultured CPCs. Values represent the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, n = 4.
Growth Factor and Chemokine Secretion Significantly Increased in Scaffold-Cultured Human CPCs
After the detection of significantly altered intracellular signaling cascades, we used RT-PCR to determine the level of expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and stromal cell–derived factor 1α (SDF-1α) in scaffold-cultured and control CPCs. We found that the expression of both HGF and SDF-1α was significantly higher in the scaffold-cultured CPCs (Figures 5A-B, HGF: 48-fold increase, P value < 0.01; SDF-1α: 77-fold increase; n = 3, P < 0.05).
FIGURE 5
Scaffold-cultured progenitors show elevated expression of IGF-1, HGF, and SDF-1α. The expression of cytokines in human CPCs was assessed after culturing under scaffold or control conditions (A). We confirmed the size of the statistically significant products from (A) using a 1% agarose gel (B). Band sizes based upon primer sequences: Actin (130 bp), SDF-1α (226 bp), HGF (239 bp). *P < 0.05, **P< 0.01, n = 3.
Scaffold-cultured progenitors show elevated expression of IGF-1, HGF, and SDF-1α. The expression of cytokines in humanCPCs was assessed after culturing under scaffold or control conditions (A). We confirmed the size of the statistically significant products from (A) using a 1% agarose gel (B). Band sizes based upon primer sequences: Actin (130 bp), SDF-1α (226 bp), HGF (239 bp). *P < 0.05, **P< 0.01, n = 3.
Ovine-Derived CPCs Express Markers of Early Cardiogenic Mesoderm and Primordial Cardiovascular Progenitors
CPCs were isolated from neonatal sheep in the same manner as the humanCPCs.[28] Ovine-derived CPCs were previously characterized[28] and selected to express a similar pattern of markers that have been identified in human-derived CPCs. As shown in Figures 6A to B, these progenitor cell clones express the same markers that we identified in similarly isolated clones obtained from humanpatients. Ovine-derived CPCs express markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm and primordial cardiovascular progenitors. The expression of markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm was assessed by visualizing amplicons of genes of interest using gel electrophoresis (Figure 6A) and by flow cytometry (Figure 6B). Gene and protein expression analysis indicates the presence of Bry, Isl-1 and c-kit in ovine CPCs.
FIGURE 6
Ovine-derived CPCs express markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm. The expression of markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm was assessed by visualizing amplicons of genes of interest using gel electrophoresis (A) and by flow cytometry (B). Similar to the profile of human-derived CPCs, gene and protein expression analysis indicates the presence of Bry, Isl-1, and c-kit in ovine CPCs.
Ovine-derived CPCs express markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm. The expression of markers of early cardiogenic mesoderm was assessed by visualizing amplicons of genes of interest using gel electrophoresis (A) and by flow cytometry (B). Similar to the profile of human-derived CPCs, gene and protein expression analysis indicates the presence of Bry, Isl-1, and c-kit in ovine CPCs.
Ovine-Derived, Scaffold-Cultured CPCs Express Increased Levels of the Differentiation Markers TropT and vWF
To develop an allogeneic model of early CPC transplantation on a scaffold in sheep using Isl-1 + c-kit + progenitor cells, we seeded scaffolds with ovine-derived Isl-1 + c-kit + CPC clones and cultured the scaffolds for 3 weeks, using the same procedures that we had used previously for culturing human-derived CPCs. We assessed the differentiation capacity of these cells using flow cytometry and IHC. Fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against the cardiomyocyte marker TropT and endothelial marker vWF were used to detect the presence of differentiated cells using flow cytometry. Scaffold-cultured, ovine-derived CPCs express increased levels of TropT (Figure 7A) and significantly increased levels of vWF (Figure 7D, n = 3, P < 0.001). This protein expression in scaffold-cultured CPCs was confirmed by confocal microscopy, in which the expression of both TropT and vWF are observed in the scaffold-cultured cell populations (Figures 7B-C and E-F).
FIGURE 7
Scaffold-cultured, ovine-derived CPCs maintain proliferative and stem-like potential while differentiating into cardiac derivatives. Using genetic and protein expression analysis, we measured the coexistence of differentiating and proliferating stem cells. FACS analysis and IHC were used to assess the expression of TropT and vWF. Scaffold-cultured, ovine-derived CPCs express increased levels of TropT (A-C) and significantly increased levels of vWF (D-F). RT-PCR and flow cytometry indicated the increased expression of Isl1 (G-I). Flow cytometry indicated a prostem cell shift in the cell cycle profile of scaffold-cultured ovine CPCs (J). Scaffold-cultured ovine CPCs stained positively for Ki-67, a marker of proliferation (K-L).[37] Interestingly, the scaffold culture of CPCs induced differentiation yet a proportion of cells were maintained that express the stem cell marker Isl-1. *P < 0.05, n = 3; ***P < 0.001, n = 3.
Scaffold-cultured, ovine-derived CPCs maintain proliferative and stem-like potential while differentiating into cardiac derivatives. Using genetic and protein expression analysis, we measured the coexistence of differentiating and proliferating stem cells. FACS analysis and IHC were used to assess the expression of TropT and vWF. Scaffold-cultured, ovine-derived CPCs express increased levels of TropT (A-C) and significantly increased levels of vWF (D-F). RT-PCR and flow cytometry indicated the increased expression of Isl1 (G-I). Flow cytometry indicated a prostem cell shift in the cell cycle profile of scaffold-cultured ovine CPCs (J). Scaffold-cultured ovine CPCs stained positively for Ki-67, a marker of proliferation (K-L).[37] Interestingly, the scaffold culture of CPCs induced differentiation yet a proportion of cells were maintained that express the stem cell marker Isl-1. *P < 0.05, n = 3; ***P < 0.001, n = 3.
Ovine-Derived, Scaffold-Cultured CPCs Express Increased Levels of Isl-1 and Ki-67 as Well as a Prostem Cell Shift in Cell Cycling
We sought to determine whether the differentiation observed in ovine-derived CPC scaffold culture would be paired with the maintenance of pluripotency, similar to our observations using humanpatient-derived CPC. We assessed the nature of the retained pluripotency markers by examining Isl-1 expression using RT-PCR and IHC. ISL-1 expression, a marker of cardiogenic stemness, was significantly elevated 5.6-fold (n = 3, P < 0.05, Figure 7G). This gene expression was preserved at the protein level, as indicated by the presence of Isl-1 staining (Figures 7H-I). We observed a prostem cell shift in the cell cycle profile of scaffold-cultured ovine CPCs using flow cytometry (Figure 7J). Scaffold-cultured ovine CPCs stained for Ki-67, a marker of proliferation (Figures 7K-L).
Ovine- and Human-Derived, Scaffold-Cultured CPCs Concomitantly Express Isl1, TropT, and vWF
To validate the presence of cardiac derivatives and progenitors within scaffold-cultured ovine CPCs, we performed FACS analysis using antibodies against Isl1, TropT, and vWF (Figures 8A-C). We observed the expression of all 3 markers under scaffold conditions, but of only Isl1 under control culture conditions. This was then confirmed by IHC analysis on serial sections of paraffin-embedded scaffolds that were seeded with ovine-derived CPCs (Figures 8D-F).
FIGURE 8
Concomitant expression of Isl1, TropT, and vWF in ovine-derived, scaffold-cultured CPCs. In an effort to clarify the presence of both cardiac progenitor and derivative markers, we performed FACS analysis of CPCs cultured for 3 weeks under control (red) and scaffold (blue) conditions (A-C). Unlike control conditions, under which CPCs expressed only Isl1, scaffold conditions fostered both the maintenance of Isl1 as well as the expression of vWF (A) and TropT (B). Unstained cells are shown in grey. To confirm these observations, we performed IHC analysis of serial sections of paraffin-embedded scaffolds that were seeded with ovine-derived CPCs. Secondary only staining is shown in (D). Isl1 and TropT (E) as well as Isl1 and vWF (F) were all observed to be concomitantly expressed.
Concomitant expression of Isl1, TropT, and vWF in ovine-derived, scaffold-cultured CPCs. In an effort to clarify the presence of both cardiac progenitor and derivative markers, we performed FACS analysis of CPCs cultured for 3 weeks under control (red) and scaffold (blue) conditions (A-C). Unlike control conditions, under which CPCs expressed only Isl1, scaffold conditions fostered both the maintenance of Isl1 as well as the expression of vWF (A) and TropT (B). Unstained cells are shown in grey. To confirm these observations, we performed IHC analysis of serial sections of paraffin-embedded scaffolds that were seeded with ovine-derived CPCs. Secondary only staining is shown in (D). Isl1 and TropT (E) as well as Isl1 and vWF (F) were all observed to be concomitantly expressed.
DISCUSSION
Stem cell-based therapies remain limited in efficacy, in part due to the ongoing challenge of poor cell retention at the site of damage. We have demonstrated here that Isl-1 + c-kit + CPCs cultured on a hyper-crosslinked carbohydrate polymer scaffold proliferate, retain a CPC reserve within the scaffold, and differentiate into cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells, providing a niche that may be useful in future studies of cardiovascular transplantation and eventual clinical application.Clinical regeneration is predicated, in part, by suitable preclinical studies. Because the ovine heart is similar to the human heart,[25,28] the ovine model has become an accepted large animal model for cardiac research.[26] The similar profile of gene and protein expression in human- and ovine-derived CPCs, as well as the similar results obtained after scaffold culture, suggest a plausible path forward for allogeneic preclinical modeling of cardiac repair. Many limiting factors require optimization to improve cell-based repair, which can be addressed using scaffold-based culture of sheep progenitor cells for transplantation.Previous efforts to optimize scaffold culture conditions to produce an appropriate ratio of cardiac derivatives for transplantation with the capability of repairing the damaged myocardium and providing vascularization to the site of damage are ongoing.[16,17,21-23,38] We conducted our experiments using early stage cardiovascular committed CPCs with the objective of providing a progenitor with the capability of differentiating into all cardiovascular lineages on the scaffold, consistent with the differentiation capability of these cells when induced in vivo. Induction of endothelial and cardiomyocyte marker expression was paired with the maintenance of pluripotent markers and a prostemness cell cycle profile. We observed a statistically significant reduction in the G1 phase of the human-derived, scaffold-cultured CPCs. This punctuation of the G1 phase is characteristic of stem cell cycling.[39,40] This observation, along with the increase in cardiac derivative marker expression, suggests that a portion of the CPCs cultured using a scaffold experienced both a punctuated G1 phase and increased pluripotency markers that are characteristic of proliferative stem cells, whereas other CPCs differentiated. This was supported by the expression of Isl-1 and Ki-67 in ovine-derived scaffold cultures. Consistent with this concept, a biomimetic hydrogel scaffold was previously shown to provide a functional niche in which stemness was promoted through the expression of self-renewal–associated transcription factors.[41] Other biomaterial substrates have also been reported to foster the spontaneous formation of cellular spheroids, which preserve stemness.[42] In addition to preserving proliferative potential, a 3D-printed/hyaluronic acid matrix containing CPCs preserved their ability to subsequently differentiate using 5-Azacytidine.[37] Similarly, we show that stemness can be preserved on an 8 × 2 mm hyper-crosslinked polymer scaffold of 97% porosity (20-80 μm pore size). Yet, we also demonstrated that this proliferative potential of CPCs is maintained in conjunction with differentiation in the absence of exogenous factors after scaffold culture. Using FACS and IHC analysis of scaffold-cultured CPCs derived from both human and ovine sources, we observed the concomitant expression of the progenitor marker Isl1 and the derivative markers TropT and vWF. This maintenance of a reserve pool of progenitors along with differentiation is perhaps a consequence of the unique progenitor cell/scaffold pairing in the model presented herein.Scaffolds work through their mechanical properties and topography to partly direct cells towards differentiation or “dedifferentiation” (ie, the loss of a differentiated phenotype).[43] This logically follows from the resemblance of the 3D scaffold structure to the stem cell niches that are endogenous to the human body and can facilitate the ECM remodeling that is necessary to address the needs of development.[44-46] A 3D environment recreates the physical interactions[42] that affect the migration,[47] proliferation,[48] and apoptosis[49] of stem cells. We observed differentiation in the scaffold-cultured population in both human- and ovine-derived CPCs and an induction of autorhythmic calcium flux in scaffold-culture CPCs that was nonexistent in control cultures. A recent report identified that the mechanical stress of a 3D environment favors cardiac-specific derivatives of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).[50] This differentiation of CPCs towards the cardiomyocyte lineage is restricted by a maximal pressure exerted (ie, “stiffness”) by the ECM.[51] Differentiation is commonly observed in stem cells that are cultured using ECM-like conditions[12] or when used in a fibrin enriched environment.[52,53]Differentiation is a consequence of scaffold-cultured stem cell interaction with the ECM.[13] We therefore explored the regulatory signaling pathway and chemokine expression profile of scaffold-cultured CPCs in our model. We observed a decline in MEK/ERK signaling but a trend toward elevated PI3K/AKT phosphorylation. This is consistent with previous reports in which AKT signaling and ERK suppression is evidenced to preserve stemness,[54-57] particularly in scaffold-cultured stem cells.[58] Changes in ERK1/2 activity have been documented to be involved in the conversion of pluripotent stem cells to committed cell lineages.[57] Interestingly, reducing β catenin signaling, as is the case in reduced ERK signaling,[59,60] facilitates the respecification of cranial mesoderm into cardiomyocytes.[61]Scaffolds that support the maintenance of stem cells solely for the purpose of paracrine factor secretion have provided beneficial effects after transplantation.[62] Paracrine factors enhance neovascularization and reduce cell death. Recently, a swine model of an acute myocardial infarction demonstrated improved clinical outcomes after IGF-1 and HGF administration[63] due to a reduction in pathologic tissue growth (fibroblast proliferation) and an induction of myocardial regeneration. SDF-1α, an angiogenic factor, has been shown to be beneficial in numerous transplant and basic science settings.[11,63-67] Among these, Tilokee et al[65] have shown that the paracrine effect of CPC transplantation itself is sufficient to promote cardiac repair. In addition to our observations, these studies have shown that a stem cell/scaffold combination has the potential to mobilize and recruit stem cells due to the presence of growth factor receptor systems that mobilize CPCs and support myocardial regeneration. Preclinical studies that assess this capability and the capacity of the reserve progenitor population to contribute to regeneration in vivo will be necessary to verify whether these findings benefit functional outcomes in the field of stem cell transplantation.
Authors: Jennifer A Dixon; Robert C Gorman; Robert E Stroud; Shenikqua Bouges; Hamamoto Hirotsugu; Joseph H Gorman; Timothy P Martens; Silviu Itescu; Michael D Schuster; Theodore Plappert; Martin G St John-Sutton; Francis G Spinale Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jia-Ling Ruan; Nathaniel L Tulloch; Mark Saiget; Sharon L Paige; Maria V Razumova; Michael Regnier; Kelvin Chan Tung; Gordon Keller; Lil Pabon; Hans Reinecke; Charles E Murry Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Tania I Fuentes; Nancy Appleby; Eric Tsay; J Julian Martinez; Leonard Bailey; Nahidh Hasaniya; Mary Kearns-Jonker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Victor Camberos; Jonathan Baio; Leonard Bailey; Nahidh Hasaniya; Larry V Lopez; Mary Kearns-Jonker Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Plamena M Koleva; James H Keefer; Alexandria M Ayala; Isabela Lorenzo; Christine E Han; Kristen Pham; Stacy E Ralston; Kee D Kim; Charles C Lee Journal: Biores Open Access Date: 2019-07-01