OBJECTIVES: We compared biological repairafter acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with selected porcine progenitor cell populations. BACKGROUND: Cell types and mechanisms responsible for myocardial repair after AMI remain uncertain. METHODS: In a blinded, randomized study, we infused autologous late-outgrowth endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) (n = 10, 34 +/- 22x 10(6) CD29-31-positive, capable of tube formation), allogeneic green fluorescent peptide-labeled mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) (n = 11, 10 +/- 2 x 10(6) CD29-44-90-positive, capable of adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation), or vehicle (CON) (n = 12) in the circumflex artery 1 week after AMI. Systolic function (ejection fraction), left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, and infarct size were assessed with magnetic resonance imaging at 1 week and 7 weeks. Cell engraftment and vascular density were evaluated on postmortem sections. RESULTS:Recovery of LV ejection fraction from 1 to 7 weeks was similar between groups, but LV remodeling markedly differed with a greater increase of LV end-systolic volume in MSC and CON (+11 +/- 12 ml/m(2) and +7 +/- 8 ml/m(2) vs. -3 +/- 11 ml/m(2) in EPC, respectively, p = 0.04), and a similar trend was noted for LV end-diastolic volume (p = 0.09). After EPC, infarct size decreased more in segments with >50% infarct transmurality (p = 0.02 vs. MSC and CON) and was associated with a greater vascular density (p = 0.01). Late outgrowth EPCs secrete higher levels of the pro-angiogenic placental growth factor (733 [277 to 1,214] pg/10(6) vs. 59 [34 to 88] pg/10(6) cells in MSC, p = 0.03) and incorporate in neovessels in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of late-outgrowth EPCs after AMI improves myocardial infarction remodeling via enhanced neovascularization but does not mediate cardiomyogenesis. Endothelial progenitor cell transfer might hold promise for heart failure prevention via pro-angiogenic or paracrine matrix-modulating effects.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: We compared biological repair after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with selected porcine progenitor cell populations. BACKGROUND: Cell types and mechanisms responsible for myocardial repair after AMI remain uncertain. METHODS: In a blinded, randomized study, we infused autologous late-outgrowth endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) (n = 10, 34 +/- 22 x 10(6) CD29-31-positive, capable of tube formation), allogeneic green fluorescent peptide-labeled mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) (n = 11, 10 +/- 2 x 10(6) CD29-44-90-positive, capable of adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation), or vehicle (CON) (n = 12) in the circumflex artery 1 week after AMI. Systolic function (ejection fraction), left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, and infarct size were assessed with magnetic resonance imaging at 1 week and 7 weeks. Cell engraftment and vascular density were evaluated on postmortem sections. RESULTS: Recovery of LV ejection fraction from 1 to 7 weeks was similar between groups, but LV remodeling markedly differed with a greater increase of LV end-systolic volume in MSC and CON (+11 +/- 12 ml/m(2) and +7 +/- 8 ml/m(2) vs. -3 +/- 11 ml/m(2) in EPC, respectively, p = 0.04), and a similar trend was noted for LV end-diastolic volume (p = 0.09). After EPC, infarct size decreased more in segments with >50% infarct transmurality (p = 0.02 vs. MSC and CON) and was associated with a greater vascular density (p = 0.01). Late outgrowth EPCs secrete higher levels of the pro-angiogenic placental growth factor (733 [277 to 1,214] pg/10(6) vs. 59 [34 to 88] pg/10(6) cells in MSC, p = 0.03) and incorporate in neovessels in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of late-outgrowth EPCs after AMI improves myocardial infarction remodeling via enhanced neovascularization but does not mediate cardiomyogenesis. Endothelial progenitor cell transfer might hold promise for heart failure prevention via pro-angiogenic or paracrine matrix-modulating effects.
Authors: Kerstin Buttler; Muhammad Badar; Virginia Seiffart; Sandra Laggies; Gerhard Gross; Jörg Wilting; Herbert A Weich Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 9.261
Authors: Samir K Gupta; Ziyue Liu; Emily C Sims; Matthew J Repass; Laura S Haneline; Mervin C Yoder Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Bo Wang; Sourav S Patnaik; Bryn Brazile; J Ryan Butler; Andrew Claude; Ge Zhang; Jianjun Guan; Yi Hong; Jun Liao Journal: Crit Rev Biomed Eng Date: 2015
Authors: Xiang-Yang Zhu; Victor Urbieta-Caceres; James D Krier; Stephen C Textor; Amir Lerman; Lilach O Lerman Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Dieter Dauwe; Beatriz Pelacho; Arief Wibowo; Ann-Sophie Walravens; Kristoff Verdonck; Hilde Gillijns; Ellen Caluwe; Peter Pokreisz; Nick van Gastel; Geert Carmeliet; Maarten Depypere; Frederik Maes; Nina Vanden Driessche; Walter Droogne; Johan Van Cleemput; Johan Vanhaecke; Felipe Prosper; Catherine Verfaillie; Aernout Luttun; Stefan Janssens Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 5.501