Literature DB >> 28572086

Functional morphology of the lower esophageal sphincter and crural diaphragm determined by three-dimensional high-resolution esophago-gastric junction pressure profile and CT imaging.

Ravinder K Mittal1, Ali Zifan2, Dushyant Kumar2, Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee2, Erika Ruppert2, Gary Ghahremani2.   

Abstract

The smooth muscles of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and skeletal muscles of the crural diaphragm (CD) provide a closure/antireflux barrier mechanism at the esophago-gastric junction (EGJ). A number of questions in regard to the pressure profile of the LES and CD remain unclear, e.g., 1) Why is the LES pressure profile circumferentially asymmetric, 2) Is the crural diaphragm (CD) contraction also circumferentially asymmetric, and 3) Where is the LES and CD pressure profile located in the anatomy of the esophagus and stomach? The three-dimensional (3-D) high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) catheter can record a detailed profile of the EGJ pressure; however, it does not allow the determination of the circumferential orientation of individual pressure transducers in vivo. We used computed tomography (CT) scan imaging in combination with 3-D EGJ pressure recordings to determine the functional morphology of the LES and CD and its relationship to the EGJ anatomy. A 3-D-HRM catheter with 96 transducers (12 rings, 7.5 mm apart, located over 9-cm length of the catheter, with eight transducers in each ring, 45° apart (Medtronics), was used to record the EGJ pressure in 10 healthy subjects. A 0.5-mm diameter metal ball (BB) was taped to the catheter, adjacent to transducer 1 of the catheter. The EGJ was recorded under the following conditions: 1) end-expiration (LES pressure) before swallow, after swallow, and after edrophonium hydrochloride; and 2) peak inspiration (crural diaphragm contraction) for tidal inspiration and forced maximal inspiration. A CT scan was performed to localize the circumferential orientation of the BB. The CT scan imaging allowed the determination of the circumferential orientation of the LES and CD pressure profiles. The LES pressure under the three end-expiration conditions were different; however, the shape of the pressure profile was unique with the LES length longer toward the lesser curvature of the stomach as compared with the greater curvature. The pressure profile revealed circular and axial pressure asymmetry, with greatest pressure and shortest cranio-caudal length on the left (close to the angle of His). The CD contraction with tidal and forced inspiration increases pressure in the cranial half of the LES pressure profile, and it was placed horizontally across the recording. The CD, esophagus, and stomach were outlined in the CT scan images to construct a 3-D anatomy of the region; it revealed that the hiatus (CD) is placed obliquely across the esophagus; however, because of the bend of the esophagus to the left at the upper edge of the hiatus, the two were placed at right angle to each other, which resulted in a horizontal pressure profile of the CD on the LES. Our observations suggest a unique shape of the LES, CD, and the anatomical relationship between the two, which provides a possible explanation as to why the LES pressure shows circumferential and axial asymmetry. Our findings have implication for the length and circumferential orientation of myotomy incision required for the ablation of LES pressure in achalasia esophagus.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We used computed tomography scan imaging with three-dimensional esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) pressure recordings to determine functional morphology of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm and its relationship to EGJ anatomy. The LES pressure profile was unique with the LES length longer and pressures lower toward the lesser curvature of the stomach, as compared with the greater curvature. Our findings have implications for the length and circumferential orientation of myotomy incision required for the ablation of LES pressure in the achalasia esophagus.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  circumferential asymmetry of the LOS pressure; computed tomography; crural diaphragm and LOS pressure; functional morphology of the esophago-gastric junction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28572086      PMCID: PMC5625133          DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00130.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  27 in total

1.  Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms.

Authors:  Manuel Guizar-Sicairos; Samuel T Thurman; James R Fienup
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.776

2.  Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometry.

Authors:  R C Arndorfer; J J Stef; W J Dodds; J H Linehan; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  The sphincter that is a sphinx.

Authors:  F J Ingelfinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Greater curvature myotomy is a safe and effective modified technique in per-oral endoscopic myotomy (with videos).

Authors:  Manabu Onimaru; Haruhiro Inoue; Haruo Ikeda; Chiaki Sato; Hiroki Sato; Chainarong Phalanusitthepha; Esperanza Grace Santi; Kevin L Grimes; Hiroaki Ito; Shin-ei Kudo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Neural reflex of the canine pylorus to intraduodenal acid infusion.

Authors:  H D Allescher; E E Daniel; J Dent; J E Fox; F Kostolanska
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Comparison of human and porcine gastric clasp and sling fiber contraction by M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  Anil K Vegesna; Alan S Braverman; Larry S Miller; Ronald J Tallarida; Mansoor I Tiwana; Umar Khayyam; Michael R Ruggieri
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.052

7.  Three-dimensional high-resolution reconstruction of the human gastro-oesophageal junction.

Authors:  R Yassi; L K Cheng; S Al-Ali; G Sands; D Gerneke; I LeGrice; A J Pullan; J A Windsor
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.414

8.  Pharmacological dissection of the human gastro-oesophageal segment into three sphincteric components.

Authors:  James G Brasseur; Rhys Ulerich; Qing Dai; Dalipkumar K Patel; Ahmed M S Soliman; Larry S Miller
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Intraoperative study on the relationship between the lower esophageal sphincter pressure and the muscular components of the gastro-esophageal junction in achalasic patients.

Authors:  S Mattioli; V Pilotti; V Felice; M P Di Simone; F D'Ovidio; G Gozzetti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Muscular equivalent of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  D Liebermann-Meffert; M Allgöwer; P Schmid; A L Blum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Anatomy of Paraesophageal Hernias.

Authors:  Roman V Petrov; Stacey Su; Charles T Bakhos; Abbas El-Sayed Abbas
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  Three-Dimensional Pressure Profile of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter and Crural Diaphragm in Patients with Achalasia Esophagus.

Authors:  Ravinder K Mittal; Dushyant Kumar; Seth J Kligerman; Ali Zifan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Tissue engineering of the gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Caleb D Vogt; Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.963

4.  A fully resolved multiphysics model of gastric peristalsis and bolus emptying in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Shashank Acharya; Sourav Halder; Wenjun Kou; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 6.698

5.  Three-Dimensional High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry Study of the Esophagogastric Junction in Patients with Achalasia.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Guillaumot; Chloé Léandri; Sarah Leblanc; Romain Coriat; Frédéric Prat; Stanislas Chaussade; Maximilien Barret
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Botox injection into the lower esophageal sphincter induces hiatal paralysis and gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Dushyant Kumar; Ali Zifan; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 7.  Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Peter J Kahrilas; Mark R Fox; Albert J Bredenoord; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; Arash Babaei; Ravinder K Mittal; Nathalie Rommel; Edoardo Savarino; Daniel Sifrim; André Smout; Michael F Vaezi; Frank Zerbib; Junichi Akiyama; Shobna Bhatia; Serhat Bor; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Daniel Cisternas; Charles Cock; Enrique Coss-Adame; Nicola de Bortoli; Claudia Defilippi; Ronnie Fass; Uday C Ghoshal; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Albis Hani; Geoffrey S Hebbard; Kee Wook Jung; Philip Katz; David A Katzka; Abraham Khan; Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Adriana Lazarescu; Johannes Lengliner; Sumeet K Mittal; Taher Omari; Moo In Park; Roberto Penagini; Daniel Pohl; Joel E Richter; Jordi Serra; Rami Sweis; Jan Tack; Roger P Tatum; Radu Tutuian; Marcelo F Vela; Reuben K Wong; Justin C Wu; Yinglian Xiao; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Chicago Classification update (v4.0): Technical review of high-resolution manometry metrics for EGJ barrier function.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Ravinder K Mittal; Serhat Bor; Geoffrey P Kohn; Johannes Lenglinger; Sumeet K Mittal; John E Pandolfino; Jordi Serra; Roger Tatum; Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 9.  Current Advancement on the Dynamic Mechanism of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Zhi Zheng; Yuxi Shang; Ning Wang; Xiaoye Liu; Chenglin Xin; Xiaosheng Yan; Yuhao Zhai; Jie Yin; Jun Zhang; Zhongtao Zhang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-03       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  Morphology of the Esophageal Hiatus: Is It Different in 3 Types of Hiatus Hernias?

Authors:  Dushyant Kumar; Ali Zifan; Gary Ghahremani; David C Kunkel; Santiago Horgan; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.